roger wrote:I recall actually seeing a formula for this, but can't remember it. It was something on the order of "one half the man's age, plus seven". However it was stated, it didn't seem completely implausible, but any such statement will only work with large numbers, ignoring individual variations.
hmmm, that would mean that a 30 year old man should marry a 22 year old woman, a 40 year old should partner with a 27 year old, and a 50 year old should look for someone 32. I think that was developed by a buncha men :wink:
Glynclig -- I don't think there is any one best difference. My first husband was 4.5 years older than me, my current one is 4.5 years younger. The first one ended in divorce. The second one is going on 20 years. I think more important than the age difference is the age and maturity levels of the two people in the relationship.