55
   

AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND

 
 
joefromchicago
 
  3  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2009 09:40 am
@parados,
parados wrote:

Foxfyre wrote:

Good. Perhaps we can have a good discussion.

I don't know if I agree with every statement listed because I didn't evaluate that closely when I posted the piece. You apparently did since you seem to declare them all lies.

It was rather nice of Foxfyre to rewrite your words so they made sense Joe.

It would look pretty silly of her to agree there were lies in the piece and have to agree with you. Much easier to simply rewrite what you said to allow her to change her argument.

I think she just doesn't want to have to look up "farrago." Maybe ican can post the dictionary definition for her so she can avoid any embarrassment.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2009 09:43 am
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:

Really? I didn't think it was discussing Democrats at all.


Well, the title of the article is 'Why Liberals are still angry.'

Quote:
Some of us have finally gotten it through out heads that Republican is not a synonym for 'conservative' and Democrat is not a synonym for "liberal'. Why don't you catch up?


You are correct that they are not synonymous, but they are functionally equivalent.

The real point is, you got confused as to what is being discussed. When you wrote this line,

Quote:

I did say and I do believe that the list of statements is a good representation of what the tea partiers and taxpayer protest marchers are angry about. And, if I go back and evaluate them carefully, I'm pretty sure I would agree with a lot if not all of them.


I'm pretty sure that you were referring to the long 'list' posted lately of reasons why Conservatives are angry these days. But that's not the piece that we were discussing, and not the one that you quoted before. It doesn't resemble the piece under discussion at all. That's the confusing part.

I would try and keep my references straight, personally, before chiding others to 'catch up.'

Cycloptichorn
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2009 11:09 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Now that Foxie has explained to us that MACs are not republicans or conservatives, and liberals aren't democrats, any further discussion about parties is a waste of time.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  4  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2009 11:58 am
@Foxfyre,
Foxfyre wrote:
Some of us have finally gotten it through out heads that Republican is not a synonym for 'conservative' and Democrat is not a synonym for "liberal'.


that may well be the case, but when did
Quote:
the tea partiers and taxpayer protest marchers
become angry liberals?


Quote:
Why don't you catch up?
classic

0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2009 12:11 pm
Quote:

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=59927004259
Taxed Enough Already (TEA) Party Rally
Global
Basic Info
Name: Taxed Enough Already (TEA) Party Rally
Category: Common Interest - Politics

Description: On the day you pay your taxes, Wednesday, April 15, join others across the country and in your hometown who will be participating in TEA party rallies in front of their city halls. The TEA party rally will begin at 6pm.
Contact Info
Email:
Location: Williamson County Courthouse Downtown Georgetown 6-8 pm
Georgetown, TX


Recent News

A moral issue: New budget has $1.2 trillion deficit


April 3, 2009

Congress and President Obama just don't get it! The new $3.6 trillion budget includes a deficit of $1.2 trillion. One third of the budget is deficit spending, money we don’t have! That is on top of the $12 trillion we already owe.

How much is $1 trillion? Consider this: A million seconds is 11.5 days. A billion seconds is 32 years. A trillion seconds is 32,000 years. We must strongly oppose the move to make ours a socialist country.

This reckless spending is a moral issue. We are passing on to our grandchildren a debt that we created. Every man, woman and child in the country already owes $35,000, and we are piling more debt on them. We are robbing them of their right to enjoy the American Dream.

On April 15, we are sending a message to Washington that we want a fiscally responsible government. Attend our TEA PARTY RALLY IN GEORGETOWN AT THE WILLIAMSON COUNTY COURTHOUSE FROM 6-8PM and be sure to take a car load of friends with you to the rally.

You can find all the information you need at TEAPartyDay.com, including how to organize a TEA Party rally, location of rallies in your area. organizers and much more.





Are you fed up with a Congress and a president who:

** vote for a $500 billion tax bill without even reading it?

** are spending trillions of borrowed dollars, leaving a debt our great-grandchildren will be paying?
** consistently give special interest groups billions of dollars in earmarks to help get themselves re-elected?
** want to take your wealth and redistribute it to others?
** punish those who practice responsible financial behavior and reward those who do not?
** admit to using the financial hurt of millions as an opportunity to push their political agenda?
** run up trillions of dollars of debt and then sell that debt to countries such as China?
** want government controlled health care?
** want to take away the right to vote with a secret ballot in union elections?
** refuse to stop the flow of millions of illegal immigrants into our country?
** appoint a defender of child pornography to the Number 2 position in the Justice Department?
** want to force doctors and other medical workers to perform abortions against their will?
** want to impose a carbon tax on your electricity, gas and home heating fuels?
** want to reduce your tax deductibility for charitable gifts?
** take money from your family budget to pay for their federal budget?
If so, participate in the TEA party rally, the Taxed Enough Already (TEA) party.


0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  0  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2009 01:52 pm
Tort reform is an essential part of reining in the cost of medical health insurance.
Quote:

http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/05/19/doctors-flock-to-texas-after-tort-reform/
In the last three years, 7,000 doctors have moved to Texas. So many doctors want to practice there that the state has had trouble keeping up with the requests for licenses.

Texas Capitol
How come the flood? A clampdown on damages in malpractice suits has made Texas a very attractive place to practice medicine, says an opinion piece in the WSJ.

The most significant change is a $250,000 cap on non-economic damages per defendant, such as pain and suffering and loss of companionship. “Before the caps, the average award was $1.21 million; it’s been $880,000 since,” the Dallas Morning News reported last year.

Malpractice suits have plummeted. In 2003, before the caps took effect, there were 1,108 medical liability suits filed in Dallas County, the Morning News reported. Only 142 cases were filed in 2004. Last year there were 184.

Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2009 01:56 pm
@ican711nm,
ican711nm wrote:

Tort reform is an essential part of reining in the cost of medical health insurance.
Quote:

http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/05/19/doctors-flock-to-texas-after-tort-reform/
In the last three years, 7,000 doctors have moved to Texas. So many doctors want to practice there that the state has had trouble keeping up with the requests for licenses.

Texas Capitol
How come the flood? A clampdown on damages in malpractice suits has made Texas a very attractive place to practice medicine, says an opinion piece in the WSJ.

The most significant change is a $250,000 cap on non-economic damages per defendant, such as pain and suffering and loss of companionship. “Before the caps, the average award was $1.21 million; it’s been $880,000 since,” the Dallas Morning News reported last year.

Malpractice suits have plummeted. In 2003, before the caps took effect, there were 1,108 medical liability suits filed in Dallas County, the Morning News reported. Only 142 cases were filed in 2004. Last year there were 184.




So, where is your data showing that health insurance rates in Texas, or the amounts doctors charge for their services, has dropped accordingly?

Cycloptichorn
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2009 02:00 pm
@ican711nm,
Another major step toward reining in the cost of medical health insurance, is permitting a resident of any state to purchase medical health insurance from any private medical health insurance provider, regardless of the state in which it is located.
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2009 02:04 pm
@ican711nm,
Another major step toward reining in the cost to the insured of medical health insurance, is the federal government permitting the insured to deduct part of his price of medical insurance directly from his federal taxes on taxable income.
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2009 02:16 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:
So, where is your data showing that health insurance rates in Texas, or the amounts doctors charge for their services, has dropped accordingly?

That "data" is available here:
http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/05/19/doctors-flock-to-texas-after-tort-reform/

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121097874071799863.html

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/stories/DN-medmal_17bus.ART0.State.Edition2.43983f4.html
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2009 02:25 pm
@ican711nm,
A major step toward helping those unable to afford the cost to the insured of private medical health insurance, is the federal government permitting those of us who can afford it, to deduct directly from our federal taxes on taxable income, part of our contribution to those private charities that help those, otherwise unable to afford the cost of private medical health insurance, to obtain private medical health insurance.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2009 02:33 pm
@ican711nm,
From your source:

Quote:
The Texas Medical Liability Trust, the biggest insurer of Texas doctors, reports that it has dropped its malpractice rates 26.5 percent since 2003. The average general surgeon in Dallas, for example, is paying $35,417 for a policy that cost him $48,147 in 2003.

[...]

In 2006, the state's 26,497 commercially insured doctors saved roughly $49 million in premiums, an average of about $1,811 each, according to the Texas Alliance for Patient Access.

The caps have saved hospitals millions also. Texas Health Resources, the largest health system in D-FW, now pays $6.9 million in yearly malpractice premiums, down 41 percent from 2004, a spokeswoman said.

Baylor Health Care System, the area's second-largest system, has seen its malpractice insurance premiums fall an average of 25 percent, said Paul Convery, Baylor's chief medical officer.

But not one of the hospitals or doctors interviewed for this article said they are cutting the prices they charge to patients or health insurers.

[...]

For Texas patients, the cost of personal health care " from hospital stays to prescription drugs " continues to increase, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. From 2003 to 2004, the most recent data available, personal health care costs increased 7 percent, from $98.7 billion to $105.5 billion, the third-largest year-over-year increase since tracking began in 1980. The largest growth in spending occurred between 2000 and 2002.

Personal health care spending jumped from 10.6 percent of the state's gross domestic product in 2000 to 11.7 percent in 2004, according to the bureau.

Mr. Black, the UT professor, was not surprised by the lack of savings for patients. The promise of lower prices was a red herring from the start, he said. Medical malpractice costs " both in defense and in payouts " account for at most 2 cents of the health care dollar, he said. Others peg the percentage slightly higher.

cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2009 02:58 pm
@old europe,
I think it's pretty much been common knowledge that malpractice costs to health care is not significant enough to make any difference to insurance premium payers.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  0  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2009 03:02 pm
The Obama plans for helping rescue the USA economy will not rescue the USA economy. These Obama plans will make the USA economy far worse than it is now. Look what Obama's actions upto September 1, 2009 have done to total annual employment.

TREND IN TOTAL ANNUAL EMPLOYMENT

ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/suppl/empsit.cpseea1.txt
EMPLOYMENT
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2008/pdf/hist.pdf
OUTLAYS

....Total Employed..........Change
2000 136,891,000------------------
2001 136,933,000.........+42,000
2002 136,485,000.......-448,000
2003 137,736,000....+1,251,000
2004 139,252,000....+1,516,000
2005 141,730,000....+2,478,000
2006 144,427,000....+2.697,000
2007 146,047,000....+1,620,000
2008 145,362,000........-685,000
2009 139,649,000.....-5,713,000 (as of August)

Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2009 03:22 pm
@ican711nm,
ican711nm wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:
So, where is your data showing that health insurance rates in Texas, or the amounts doctors charge for their services, has dropped accordingly?

That "data" is available here:
http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/05/19/doctors-flock-to-texas-after-tort-reform/

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121097874071799863.html

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/stories/DN-medmal_17bus.ART0.State.Edition2.43983f4.html


None of your links include the data you claim they do. None of them show that the rates doctors charge for treatment has dropped. Not even a little bit. This is very, very harmful to your case, Ican, that Malpractice reform leads to lower health care prices for consumers; indeed, it only at this time seems to lead to higher profits for doctors and hospitals.

Cycloptichorn
kickycan
 
  2  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2009 03:25 pm
@ican711nm,
ican711nm wrote:
The Obama plans for helping rescue the USA economy will not rescue the USA economy. These Obama plans will make the USA economy far worse than it is now.


Two statements that should be taken as seriously as I took my uncle when he told me in the early 90's, "Don't be a dope, kid. Get into the newspaper business. This internet thing is just a fad."
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2009 03:30 pm
@old europe,
Old Europe, you quoted the following from my source:
Quote:

http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/05/19/doctors-flock-to-texas-after-tort-reform/
For Texas patients, the cost of personal health care " from hospital stays to prescription drugs " continues to increase, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. From 2003 to 2004, the most recent data available, personal health care costs increased 7 percent, from $98.7 billion to $105.5 billion, the third-largest year-over-year increase since tracking began in 1980. The largest growth in spending occurred between 2000 and 2002.

From the same source:
Quote:

http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/05/19/doctors-flock-to-texas-after-tort-reform/
May 19, 2008, 7:44 AM ET
Doctors Flock to Texas After Tort Reform
...
Malpractice suits have plummeted. In 2003, before the caps took effect, there were 1,108 medical liability suits filed in Dallas County, the Morning News reported. Only 142 cases were filed in 2004. Last year [2007] there were 184.

http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/05/19/doctors-flock-to-texas-after-tort-reform/
In the last three years [May 2005, 2006, 2007, May 2008], 7,000 doctors have moved to Texas. So many doctors want to practice there that the state has had trouble keeping up with the requests for licenses.

By a more careful review of my source, it should be clear to you that the data you quoted applies only up to 2004 when the caps took effect. After 2004 the benefit of the caps began to grow substantially.
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2009 03:39 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:
None of your links include the data you claim they do. None of them show that the rates doctors charge for treatment has dropped. Not even a little bit. This is very, very harmful to your case, Ican, that Malpractice reform leads to lower health care prices for consumers; indeed, it only at this time seems to lead to higher profits for doctors and hospitals.

My claim has been and continues to be that tort reform will contribute to lower cost medical health insurance.
Quote:
Tort reform is an essential part of reining in the cost of medical health insurance.
I am now claiming--based on a very limited informal survey of me and my acquaintances--that it already has in Texas contributed to lower cost medical health insurance. I would be very interested in seeing your data that supports your claim that tort reform leads "to higher profits for doctors and hospitals."
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2009 03:40 pm
@ican711nm,
You posted the links in a reply to Cycloptichorn's question about where your data would show that health insurance rates in Texas or the amounts doctors charged for their services had dropped accordingly. Not only did the data from your links not show any kind of drop in insurance rates for patients or amount of money charged by doctors after the caps went into effect - in fact, the data shows that personal health care costs increased from the year before the caps went into effect to the year after.

Sure, hospitals and doctors were able to save money, but that was not the benefit you originally claimed the Texas example would show. Your original claim was that tort reform would constitute "major step toward reining in the cost of medical health insurance". You have completely failed to demonstrate that.
old europe
 
  2  
Reply Fri 18 Sep, 2009 03:42 pm
@ican711nm,
ican711nm wrote:
I am now claiming--based on a very limited informal survey of me and my acquaintances--that it already has in Texas contributed to lower cost medical health insurance.


Anecdotal evidence notwithstanding, the actual data from the articles you have linked to from before and after the caps went into effect show the opposite to be true.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 01/11/2025 at 07:00:36