@ican711nm,
ican711nm wrote:
A dollar bill--or a multidollar bill--is PRINTED MONEY. From the following definitions, a dollar bill--or a multidollar bill--is PRINTED MONEY and is one kind of note and therefore is one kind of security.
This is a good place to assess what we have learned so far:
1. If it wasn't obvious before, I think it's abundantly clear now that a truly literalist approach to constitutional interpretation yields nothing but absurdity. As
Thomas pointed out, one can't
not interpret the constitution. It was, after all, designed to be interpreted -- something that Chief Justice Marshall noted 190 years ago in
McCulloch v. Maryland, the necessity of which "tenthers" like
Ican have never been able to accept in principle but which they themselves inevitably resort to in practice.
2. And while "tenthers" have no trouble claiming that social welfare programs lack any explicit constitutional authority, even
Ican is reduced to increasingly preposterous circumlocutions when it comes to inventing constitutional justifications for government programs that he likes. Thus, when presented with the discomfiting paradox that the constitution doesn't explicitly authorize congress to print money, he ends up deciding that paper money must constitute government "securities." The other option -- following through with his literalist interpretation and admitting that congress is not permitted to print money -- is just too monstrous for him to accept. He is left, then, to advert to the unimpeachable authority of Messrs. Merriam and Webster and declare that the framers of the constitution actually provided for the punishment of those who would counterfeit paper money even though they never got around to granting congress the power to print that money.
3. It should, therefore, be evident that
Ican and those of his ilk fit the definition of "
cranks," the main characteristics of which are:
1. Cranks overestimate their own knowledge and ability, and underestimate that of acknowledged experts.
2. Cranks insist that their alleged discoveries are urgently important.
3. Cranks rarely if ever acknowledge any error, no matter how trivial.
4. Cranks love to talk about their own beliefs, often in inappropriate social situations, but they tend to be bad listeners, and often appear to be uninterested in anyone else's experience or opinions.
Check, check, check, and check.
4. Is it any wonder, then, that the only authority
Ican ever uses is the dictionary? And note, he doesn't even use a legal dictionary, even though there are some available on the web. It's because he either doesn't understand enough of the law to read the supreme court opinions, or, more likely, because he doesn't like how the court interprets the constitution. I'll end the suspense for you,
Ican:
the supreme court said that congress does have the authority to print money, although I'm sorry to report that it never said anything so ridiculous as to equate money with "securities." Maybe if it had a Merriam-Webster dictionary available, the outcome would have been more to your liking.