@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:
foxfyre wrote:It has everything to do with using government power as a means of ddressing past sins and bringing about 'justice' whatever form that might take and however convoluted the definition of that might be.
What are these past sins that are being addressed by Obama's "Marxist liberation theology"?
Well, in Beck's rhetoric, you can pick out the racially disadvantaged, the underserved (by healthcare, education, etc.), the chronically unemployed, those disadvantaged in any way by lack of diversity. I don't know if Beck is correct that Obama sees these 'mistreated groups' as mostly racial minorities and is focusing mostly on that, but Obama certainly does use racial minorities as the only illustration when he is speaking to groups made up of mostly minorities.
But if 'reparations' of the mistreated, neglected, oppressed, etc. is the goal--and I think Beck is probably not far off the mark in his evaluation of that--then that only reinforces the Marxist notion that government is the appropriate way to force the oppressors to provide reparations (and therefore equality and justice) to the oppressed.
Of course Marx thought that once equality and justice (reparations) were achieved, government could then be eliminated and Utopia would prevail. Somehow those employing Marx's theology never quite get to that part though.