@Cycloptichorn,
Quote:
Ridiculous. In America the Law rules supreme, more so than any current administration. If people broke the law, it doesn't matter if they were in the outgoing government; they deserve to be investigated, charged and tried for doing so. Only in the minds of right-wingers, who are scared of being further discredited, does pursuing the Law become a bad thing.
Defending torture will sink an already depressed Republican party.
I know we are beyond this argument, but not everyone agrees that water boarding and sleep depravation are always considered 'torture.'
I'm not going to get into this, as this has been beat to death (real torture?) here already. But something to keep in mind:
Whatever actions Obama takes during his admin, reasonable as they might seem to the left, might be greatly offensive to the right. Be it guns, abortion, cap and trade, or any other issue that has America split, the potential is always there for one group to say the other group went too far and violated the Constitution. And a future rightwing admin might very well use the Obama precedent to prosecute members of his admin.
With the split in this country, especially if the pendulum swings and there is a move to the right, as has happened (both ways) in the past, one party will always be able to find potential law breaking actions being taken by the prior admin.
I guess Eisenhower could have pursued FDR admin officials for their interment camps? Or Truman, for dropping the bomb on Japan?
"Rule of law" is a great concept, but the shades of grey that come into play when people interpret the law differently is what will cause problems.
And with Obama setting the precedent, the window will be wide open for all kinds of nonsense in the future.