55
   

AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND

 
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  2  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 10:58 am
@okie,
okie wrote:

I see you are going back to the old liberal well, using the demagoguery of "greed." The term is one of the most misused and misunderstood term by liberals that could ever possibly be.


It is neither overused or mis-used, Okie. It is an accurate description of your primary motivator and that of other modern Conservatives. It grates on you because it hits home, and it's hard for you to admit to yourself.

Cycloptichorn
okie
 
  0  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 11:01 am
@Cycloptichorn,
I beg your pardon, I am not motivated by greed, Mr. Holier than thou, cyclops. Apologize or get lost. And besides, whether I am greedy or anyone else is greedy is none of your lousy business, okay. You are the greedy one for demanding part of my earnings to support your liberal crap.
Cycloptichorn
 
  2  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 11:05 am
@okie,
okie wrote:

I beg your pardon, I am not motivated by greed, Mr. Holier than thou, cyclops. Apologize or get lost.


Apologize? On another thread, you just told me that I would have supported Stalin, had I been around then. You are hardly in the position to demand apologies from anyone, sir.

Quote:
And besides, whether I am greedy or anyone else is greedy is none of your lousy business, okay. You are the greedy one for demanding part of my earnings to support your liberal crap.


Like I said - everything comes down to 'your earnings.' I'm sorry to tell you that your greed - your wish to maximize your income at the cost of all other factors - IS my concern. I won't tolerate folks like you writing the rules for the country, because I don't think placing Greed on a pedestal the way you have is a positive thing to do or the right way for our country to go.

Cycloptichorn
okie
 
  0  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 11:09 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:

Apologize? On another thread, you just told me that I would have supported Stalin, had I been around then. You are hardly in the position to demand apologies from anyone, sir.Cycloptichorn

I have no apologies to make. Your argument consistently show you support strong state run socialist policies, of which Stalin was a poster boy for. Face it, cyclops, face up to what you are supporting. I am done sugarcoating these lousy subjects here on this forum. I might as well call it for what it is, and your opinions speak for themselves, you are a big statist and socialist.
Cycloptichorn
 
  3  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 11:12 am
@okie,
okie wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Apologize? On another thread, you just told me that I would have supported Stalin, had I been around then. You are hardly in the position to demand apologies from anyone, sir.Cycloptichorn

I have no apologies to make. Your argument consistently show you support strong state run socialist policies, of which Stalin was a poster boy for. Face it, cyclops, face up to what you are supporting. I am done sugarcoating these lousy subjects here on this forum. I might as well call it for what it is, and your opinions speak for themselves, you are a big statist and socialist.


You are retreating into ideology once again. You couldn't prove my points better if you tried. You are Appealing to Extremes here, which is a logical fallacy. Not that you give a ****, because you don't care at all about logic.

This is tiresome, if we don't have actual issues to discuss, I'm not interested in your accusations of being a 'big statist.'

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  0  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 11:13 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Like I said - everything comes down to 'your earnings.' I'm sorry to tell you that your greed - your wish to maximize your income at the cost of all other factors - IS my concern. I won't tolerate folks like you writing the rules for the country, because I don't think placing Greed on a pedestal the way you have is a positive thing to do or the right way for our country to go.

Cycloptichorn

You sir, do not believe in America and what it was founded upon. Sorry, but you, sir, are full of bs. I should have known that a Berkeley liberal is a socialist or communist at his root. Is there any hope for you, it looks doubtful. When you talk about greed, you have no clue what you are talking about. It is you and your buddies like Obama that are full of greed.

P.S. I do not look at life through dollars and cents. I am saddened that you and your ilk do.
EmperorNero
 
  0  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 11:15 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Yes, dude, it does. Conservatives wish to return to the time before modern reforms existed, because they disagree with those reforms on ideological grounds - mostly they disagree with anything that restrains greed.


Let's not get bogged down with whether these changes have been for the better or detrimental, the question is whether they are liberal.
I am confused by your definition of 'conserving'. If you are making an argument to change the current situation, aren't you at that time making an argument for change? Even if that situation has existed before. And those who oppose you, aren't they defending the status quo, even if what they defend was just implemented a decade ago?
Cycloptichorn
 
  3  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 11:22 am
@okie,
okie wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:
Like I said - everything comes down to 'your earnings.' I'm sorry to tell you that your greed - your wish to maximize your income at the cost of all other factors - IS my concern. I won't tolerate folks like you writing the rules for the country, because I don't think placing Greed on a pedestal the way you have is a positive thing to do or the right way for our country to go.

Cycloptichorn

You sir, do not believe in America and what it was founded upon. Sorry, but you, sir, are full of bs. I should have known that a Berkeley liberal is a socialist or communist at his root. Is there any hope for you, it looks doubtful. When you talk about greed, you have no clue what you are talking about. It is you and your buddies like Obama that are full of greed.


You have no idea what America was 'founded upon.' You've done no research or scholarship into the issue. You just believe that everyone is exactly like you.

How exactly am I 'full of greed?' I don't want anything of yours, Okie. None of the programs I support spending money on really benefit me. I don't need housing or Health insurance assistance. I support raising MY OWN taxes along with everyone else's. What about that is greedy?

Nothing at all - you just have reverted to a childish 'oh yeah? Well YOU are the greedy ones!' argument. Extremely weak.

Cycloptichorn
ican711nm
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 11:25 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:
It is neither overused or mis-used, Okie. It is an accurate description of your primary motivator and that of other modern Conservatives. It grates on you because it hits home, and it's hard for you to admit to yourself.

NO, Cyclo! Greed, greed for control of others, greed for power over others, and greed for the THEFT of what others have lawfully earned, is the primary motivator for you OD (i.e., Obama Democrats).

The primary motivator of modern Conservatives is greed for liberty for EACH AND EVERY LAW-ABIDING PERSON.

You OD persist in clearly revealing your own motivations by falsely accusing Conservatives of possessing the very damnable characteristics of yourselves. Your greed for the power to steal what others have lawfully earned is despicable.

You justify your greed for power to steal by claiming your objective is helping those who have less to have more. But the truth is what you advocate reduces what everyone has. In particular, the implementation of what you OD advocate reduces everyone's liberty, and therefore everyone's opportunities, to lawfully earn what they want.

You OD constitute the scum of the human race.
okie
 
  0  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 11:25 am
@EmperorNero,
EmperorNero wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:
Yes, dude, it does. Conservatives wish to return to the time before modern reforms existed, because they disagree with those reforms on ideological grounds - mostly they disagree with anything that restrains greed.

There you go again on greed. You sound like all the great leftists in history, guys like Pol Pot, Chairman Mao, Stalin, Hitler, and all the rest of those great leaders.
Hey, what business do you have in defining and legislating greed out of existence? How about hatred, envy, jealosy, and all of those other terrible traits as well. Is that your religion, believing in governments ability to do away with those bad things? We have laws in regard to actions, but we do not have laws that control thought, and that is for a reason, cyclops. We have freedom of thought, but we do not have freedom to murder others due to our hatreds, envy, and jealosy, and we do not have freedom to steal from others due to our greed, envy, and jealosy, and hatred for others.

Cyclops, seriously, you have some very basic hangups and foggy thinking at the root of your political views that you really need to work on. You seem to not understand the basics of what government should do and why. And you really do not understand what America is and what its principles are.
0 Replies
 
EmperorNero
 
  0  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 11:27 am
Cycloptichorn wrote:
How exactly am I 'full of greed?' I don't want anything of yours, Okie. None of the programs I support spending money on really benefit me. I don't need housing or Health insurance assistance. I support raising MY OWN taxes along with everyone else's. What about that is greedy?


Isn't it greedy to be fine with giving away the income of "the rich", because you think you'll never be rich yourself? What you receive is an opportunity for self-congratulation at the expense of other people.
okie
 
  0  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 11:29 am
@ican711nm,
ican711nm wrote:

You OD persist in clearly revealing your own motivations by falsely accusing Conservatives of possessing the very damnable characteristics of yourselves. Your greed for the power to steal what others have lawfully earned is despicable.

You justify your greed for power to steal by claiming your objective is helping those who have less to have more. But the truth is what you advocate reduces what everyone has. In particular, the implementation of what you OD advocate reduces everyone's liberty, and therefore everyone's opportunities, to lawfully earn what they want.

You OD constitute the scum of the human race.


All great leftists in history have accused the producers of greed, so that they can gain power for themselves. They are truly the scum of the human race, that is very correct, ican.
Cycloptichorn
 
  3  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 11:30 am
@EmperorNero,
EmperorNero wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:
Yes, dude, it does. Conservatives wish to return to the time before modern reforms existed, because they disagree with those reforms on ideological grounds - mostly they disagree with anything that restrains greed.


Let's not get bogged down with whether these changes have been for the better or detrimental, the question is whether they are liberal.
I am confused by your definition of 'conserving'. If you are making an argument to change the current situation, aren't you at that time making an argument for change? Even if that situation has existed before. And those who oppose you, aren't they defending the status quo, even if what they defend was just implemented a decade ago?


This is nonsensical. We use the terms 'Liberal' and 'Conservative' in a larger sense than whether or not one supports an individual issue; and passing a new law doesn't suddenly flip and make one a Liberal instead of a Conservative.

For example, the current tax laws are set to expire at the end of this year, and everyone's taxes are going up. Currently, Republicans are working to keep that from happening - though they will fail. Nevertheless, are they now Fiscal Liberals, because of this? Nope.

Cycloptichorn
Cycloptichorn
 
  3  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 11:32 am
@ican711nm,
Quote:

You OD constitute the scum of the human race.


The pretzels you are willing to twist yourself into in order to justify never-ending greed are pretty funny, but your attempts at insult are mostly boring.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  2  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 11:33 am
@EmperorNero,
EmperorNero wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:
How exactly am I 'full of greed?' I don't want anything of yours, Okie. None of the programs I support spending money on really benefit me. I don't need housing or Health insurance assistance. I support raising MY OWN taxes along with everyone else's. What about that is greedy?


Isn't it greedy to be fine with giving away the income of "the rich", because you think you'll never be rich yourself?


No.

Quote:
What you receive is an opportunity for self-congratulation at the expense of other people.


Bullshit... this is what is typically referred to as a non-answer. It's just something you invented in your mind, with no real relevance to my life or situation at all.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  0  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 11:37 am
@okie,
I would recommend to you cyclops, that you read again this thread that I started a long time ago. I found 3 basic characteristics of some of the world's worst dictators, and the one I labeled No. 3, which I list below, talks about them believing the world was unjust and that people and businesses were greedy, which is exactly the crap that you spout here on this forum over and over and over.

http://able2know.org/topic/66117-1

3 - They perceive injustice from childhood and develop a burning desire to dominate, gain power, and right the wrongs toward society and to them as they view it. Typically there is a hate for business and private enterprise, as it is viewed as unfair and the cause of much injustice and suffering, and religion is also viewed as a failure, so government and they are the hope of righting the wrongs and creating their vision of utopia on earth.
Cycloptichorn
 
  3  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 11:38 am
@okie,
But, Okie, what you wrote in that thread isn't the result of scientific study, or some psychological analysis by professionals. It's bullshit that you made up. Why would I or anyone go read your idiocy, which has no real basis in facts at all?

When you say 'you found three factors,' what you mean to say is that you invented three things that you think could be used to attack Liberals. You didn't use any real analysis at all. It's an insult to actual historians every time you remind us that this crappy thread even exists, and you should really be embarrassed by it.

Please recall that you were thoroughly destroyed in argumentation on that thread, by both Liberals and Conservatives here on A2K.

Cycloptichorn
okie
 
  0  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 11:47 am
@Cycloptichorn,
None of what I wrote was made up, that is a complete lie that you put forth when you say it was made up. The stuff I wrote there is obvious and true, you can find it yourself in the history books.
I did in fact find three factors, main ones, there could be more. If you do not believe what I wrote to be accurate, then provide evidence to the contrary, but you can't because it is factual. Its an insult to your history, because it does not coincide with your twisted liberal view of history, it is instead based upon common sense reading of history that anyone can do. And I was not thoroughly destroyed on that thread, in fact the facts remain as a monument to the truth of history. Folks have ridiculed me, but not with facts, only their own prejudices and pre-existing twisted misconceptions of history, most notably trying to maintain that Hitler was a right wing conservative, which is obvisously total and complete hogwash. Hitler hated the supposed inherent greed of capitalism and the greedy capitalist Jews, and he was a big Statist, similar to all great leftists in history.

When you talk about greed, cyclops, you are mouthing alot of the same crap Hitler, Stalin, and Jeremiah Wright have mouthed. You could add lots of other names too, like Castro, Chairman Mao, Pol Pot, the list goes on.
Cycloptichorn
 
  3  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 11:51 am
@okie,
okie wrote:

None of what I wrote was made up, that is a complete lie that you put forth when you say it was made up. The stuff I wrote there is obvious and true, you can find it yourself in the history books.


Which books? You obviously didn't read any of them. Or perhaps you could tell us the titles you are talking about?
Quote:

I did in fact find three factors, main ones, there could be more. If you do not believe what I wrote to be accurate, then provide evidence to the contrary, but you can't because it is factual.


Opinions are not factual. Ignoring history is not factual. Selectively editing history to match your argument, not factual.
Quote:

Its an insult to your history, because it does not coincide with your twisted liberal view of history, it is instead based upon common sense reading of history that anyone can do. And I was not thoroughly destroyed on that thread, in fact the facts remain as a monument to the truth of history.


What are you, a ******* moron? GeorgeOB1 and Setanta both thoroughly destroyed your position on that thread, along with myself and many others. I've rarely seen the forces of Left and Right combine in such a way to denounce someone's idiocy, Okie. You are living in a fantasy world if you think that thread does anything but embarrass you.

Cycloptichorn
ican711nm
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2010 11:54 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:
You have no idea what America was 'founded upon.' You've done no research or scholarship into the issue. You just believe that everyone is exactly like you.

You damn OD (i.e., Obama Democrats) don't care what America was founded on. You don't want to rescue America. You want to replace it with your mindless stultifying principles.

You appear to reject these founding principles--as written and interpreted by those who wrote them--as no longer applicable or desireable to support and practice:
Quote:
The Declaration of Independence adopted in Congress July 4, 1776.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.

Quote:
The Constitution of the United States of America became effective March 4, 1789.
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Quote:
Amendment X, ratified December 15, 1791.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 07/20/2025 at 09:32:19