55
   

AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND

 
 
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 01:08 pm
I googled the last one of her quotes, ican, since it seemed one of the more loony of them (so hard to pick out one over the other there), and yes she said it, and here's a video clip of her saying it:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/28/michele-bachmann-links-sw_n_192493.html
and she apparently got her facts wrong, swine flu broke out in 1976, under Gerald Ford, which makes her attempt at a conspiracy theory even loopier.

0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 07:35 pm
@ican711nm,
Unable to use google ican?
1.) Bachmann speaking at the Heritage Foundation
(Video available) Bachmann has backtracked

2.)Bachmann speaking on Hardball with Chris Matthews -
(video available)

3.) Bachmann on KTLK radio (audio available)
No evidence of any "re-education camps."

4.) Bachmann in interview with Newsmax.

It appears they are all her words.

As to their accuracy. Even you can't believe some of them ican.
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 10:19 pm
@parados,
ican has some nerve to question the accuracy of others. He posted and reposted and reposted a highly questionable piece in which he misspelled a man's name and incorrectly identified the man's home institution. The error filled piece originated with ann coulter who seems unable to check her own 'facts.'
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  0  
Reply Fri 23 Jul, 2010 10:23 pm
@parados,
Thank you, parados and jack for your research. How can anyone doubt the lunacy of Michelle Bachmann? The woman is brain dead. Perhaps, her party should speak to her in private and urge her to do the right thing. No, it does not involve a bathtub filled with warm water.
0 Replies
 
xris
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2010 03:47 am
@ican711nm,
Once again you make unsubstantiated claims, you think just saying something proves it. How much you can accumulate is not governed by law only the means by which it is obtained. Now tell me how the democrats and Obama have broken the rule of law?
parados
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2010 07:17 am
@xris,
xris,

Ican has made his argument repeatedly. He thinks that taxation is taking his money without due process of the law. It is an idiotic position that isn't supported by anything other than his psychosis.
plainoldme
 
  0  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2010 10:35 am
@parados,
Ican is not alone in holding this sort of distorted Cartesian point of view. For these arch-conservatives, it is, "I think, therefore, I am correct."

I read through several threads last night without responding to most and what struck me about the posts of ican and two or three other arch-conservatives is their sheer egotism. A continually repeated phrase was, "I think you are wrong" which was not followed by fact or anecdote or statistic.

Rene Descartes is still inspiring debate today. The ideas of these extremists will die with them.
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2010 11:13 am
@xris,
xris wrote:

Greed is not limited by law only the means, so get your facts right. The right dont like laws limiting the means. They love corporate monopolies, its how they exploit.

Just one example would be nice, to support your ignorant claims. I think government monopolies are by far the more serious threat. With corporations, at least we have a choice whether to buy or not, but with government, typically we have no choice but to pay for a vastly inferior product, which we currently have now in Washington, both Congress and the Whitehouse.
xris
 
  0  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2010 11:29 am
@okie,
Explain the inferior monopoly the government have imposed on you? Now for the monopolies that personally effect me. Do you really want me to give you examples? If they are good examples, will you agree with me that the UK needs more laws to control them and their greed,,are you agreed?
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2010 12:01 pm
@xris,
There are thousands of examples, but how about our road system? We are stuck with paying tax on gasoline, plus other taxes, which supposedly should go to fixing roads, but most of which is mis-spent or when actually spent on roads, it goes to the wrong roads or to jobs that are done poorly. In other words, our money is not buying what it should buy, because it is a government monopoly controlled by bureaucrats that are more interested in paying themselves than they are serving the taxpayers. Not all of them, but many of them. I don't think they are doing a good job.

Its a good thing the government does not have a monopoly on producing and marketing gasoline, because I am convinced if they did, it would cost at least twice what it does now.

Unfortunately, Obamacare is moving us toward a government monopoly of health care, which will be an utter disaster.
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2010 12:26 pm
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:

Ican is not alone in holding this sort of distorted Cartesian point of view. For these arch-conservatives, it is, "I think, therefore, I am correct."

I read through several threads last night without responding to most and what struck me about the posts of ican and two or three other arch-conservatives is their sheer egotism. A continually repeated phrase was, "I think you are wrong" which was not followed by fact or anecdote or statistic.

Rene Descartes is still inspiring debate today. The ideas of these extremists will die with them.

Is there a more illustrative example of a person's self image transferred to others?

In regard to your last statement, pom, no, the desire for liberty and freedom will never die. Unfortunately, not all bad ideas die with despots either, example Karl Marx, Stalin, etc.
0 Replies
 
xris
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2010 12:29 pm
@okie,
Reality is something that happens every morning when your head leaves the pillow..Taxes are taxes , would you prefer your road fund goes to the police or the fire brigade or fills that pot hole. Is this your only gripe the idea that a road taxes are a monopoly ? I noticed not one right wing advocate responded to my post on our national health insurance in the UK. So you cant have your own health insurance with this health care, its banned? I dont think you even understand what a monoploy is.
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2010 02:02 pm
@xris,
Trust me, he does not. He surely thinks it is some sort of Nazi publication.
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2010 02:08 pm
Ego alert:
Quote:
I believe it is a very good analogy.
Quote:



I am trying to explain some simple principles to you, cyclops, but you refuse to acknowledge, or perhaps you are truly incapable of understanding simple economic concepts

0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  0  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2010 03:59 pm
@plainoldme,
Ican's comments here are in blue.
plainoldme wrote:
Ican is not alone in holding this sort of distorted Cartesian point of view. For these arch-conservatives, it is, "I think, therefore, I am correct."
I think means just that. It does not mean therefore, I am correct.

I read through several threads last night without responding to most and what struck me about the posts of ican and two or three other arch-conservatives is their sheer egotism. A continually repeated phrase was, "I think you are wrong" which was not followed by fact or anecdote or statistic.
The expression of the phrase I think by conservatives is usually preceded, included with, or followed by posts with considerable evidence. On the other hand, very little of what you, plainoldme, post, is accompanied by any evidence--before, within, or after.

Rene Descartes is still inspiring debate today. The ideas of these extremists will die with them.
Yes Descartes "is still inspiring debate," but he is not inspiring you to debate. Your posts conform to the typical OD fairy tales that malign those with whom they disagree rather than debate them. Here is some evidence of your fairy tale maligning rather than debating. It was supplied by you, plainoldme: Ican is not alone in holding this sort of distorted Cartesian point of view. For these arch-conservatives, it is, "I think, therefore, I am correct.".
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2010 06:13 pm
JM: You asked me a few pages ago about potential Repub candidates for President in 2012.
I (a Dem) was thinking Mitt Romney. But perhaps he is too much of a centrist in your party with views on some issues that would never appeal to those more to the right.
Newt is well positioned ideologically but, as you noted (and I had to look up), he sure does carry a lot, a lot of negative baggage. I don't see how he can get past that. Debates between him and Obama would be fascinating to watch, though.
Palin is out of her league. I can't imagine the Repubs going with her.
I have been watching Bobby Jindal of LA and Marco Rubio of FL. They seem to me to be rising stars but each has his plate full and may decide to wait until 2016.
Brewer of AZ is a one trick pony.

Is there anyone else I should be watching?
okie
 
  0  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2010 07:07 pm
@xris,
xris wrote:

Reality is something that happens every morning when your head leaves the pillow..Taxes are taxes , would you prefer your road fund goes to the police or the fire brigade or fills that pot hole. Is this your only gripe the idea that a road taxes are a monopoly ? I noticed not one right wing advocate responded to my post on our national health insurance in the UK. So you cant have your own health insurance with this health care, its banned? I dont think you even understand what a monoploy is.

You asked me for a government monopoly. I gave you one. It is not my only gripe. I have many gripes, but one main one is I would like to see government corruption prosecuted to the full extent of the law, example Fannie and Freddie corruption, but unfortunately, the corrupt administration is protecting them.

Of course I can have my own health insurance currently, which I do, but I believe Obama's end game is complete government take over of health care, and in fact he has admitted that is what he wants.

I do understand what a monopoly is, but I doubt you do. I will await one example now from you. I won't expect a reasonable answer, because I have yet to see you post one.
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2010 09:27 pm
The 22 statistics detailed here prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the middle class is being systematically wiped out of existence in America.

The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer at a staggering rate. Once upon a time, the United States had the largest and most prosperous middle class in the history of the world, but now that is changing at a blinding pace.

So why are we witnessing such fundamental changes? Well, the globalism and "free trade" that our politicians and business leaders insisted would be so good for us have had some rather nasty side effects. It turns out that they didn't tell us that the "global economy" would mean that middle class American workers would eventually have to directly compete for jobs with people on the other side of the world where there is no minimum wage and very few regulations. The big global corporations have greatly benefited by exploiting third world labor pools over the last several decades, but middle class American workers have increasingly found things to be very tough.

Here are the statistics to prove it:

• 83 percent of all U.S. stocks are in the hands of 1 percent of the people.
• 61 percent of Americans "always or usually" live paycheck to paycheck, which was up from 49 percent in 2008 and 43 percent in 2007.
• 66 percent of the income growth between 2001 and 2007 went to the top 1% of all Americans.
• 36 percent of Americans say that they don't contribute anything to retirement savings.
• A staggering 43 percent of Americans have less than $10,000 saved up for retirement.
• 24 percent of American workers say that they have postponed their planned retirement age in the past year.
• Over 1.4 million Americans filed for personal bankruptcy in 2009, which represented a 32 percent increase over 2008.
• Only the top 5 percent of U.S. households have earned enough additional income to match the rise in housing costs since 1975.
• For the first time in U.S. history, banks own a greater share of residential housing net worth in the United States than all individual Americans put together.
• In 1950, the ratio of the average executive's paycheck to the average worker's paycheck was about 30 to 1. Since the year 2000, that ratio has exploded to between 300 to 500 to one.
• As of 2007, the bottom 80 percent of American households held about 7% of the liquid financial assets.
• The bottom 50 percent of income earners in the United States now collectively own less than 1 percent of the nation’s wealth.
• Average Wall Street bonuses for 2009 were up 17 percent when compared with 2008.
• In the United States, the average federal worker now earns 60% MORE than the average worker in the private sector.
• The top 1 percent of U.S. households own nearly twice as much of America's corporate wealth as they did just 15 years ago.
• In America today, the average time needed to find a job has risen to a record 35.2 weeks.
• More than 40 percent of Americans who actually are employed are now working in service jobs, which are often very low paying.
• or the first time in U.S. history, more than 40 million Americans are on food stamps, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture projects that number will go up to 43 million Americans in 2011.
• This is what American workers now must compete against: in China a garment worker makes approximately 86 cents an hour and in Cambodia a garment worker makes approximately 22 cents an hour.
• Approximately 21 percent of all children in the United States are living below the poverty line in 2010 - the highest rate in 20 years.
• Despite the financial crisis, the number of millionaires in the United States rose a whopping 16 percent to 7.8 million in 2009.
• The top 10 percent of Americans now earn around 50 percent of our national income.

Giant Sucking Sound

The reality is that no matter how smart, how strong, how educated or how hard working American workers are, they just cannot compete with people who are desperate to put in 10 to 12 hour days at less than a dollar an hour on the other side of the world. After all, what corporation in their right mind is going to pay an American worker 10 times more (plus benefits) to do the same job? The world is fundamentally changing. Wealth and power are rapidly becoming concentrated at the top and the big global corporations are making massive amounts of money. Meanwhile, the American middle class is being systematically wiped out of existence as U.S. workers are slowly being merged into the new "global" labor pool.

What do most Americans have to offer in the marketplace other than their labor? Not much. The truth is that most Americans are absolutely dependent on someone else giving them a job. But today, U.S. workers are "less attractive" than ever. Compared to the rest of the world, American workers are extremely expensive, and the government keeps passing more rules and regulations seemingly on a monthly basis that makes it even more difficult to conduct business in the United States.

So corporations are moving operations out of the U.S. at breathtaking speed. Since the U.S. government does not penalize them for doing so, there really is no incentive for them to stay.

What has developed is a situation where the people at the top are doing quite well, while most Americans are finding it increasingly difficult to make it. There are now about six unemployed Americans for every new job opening in the United States, and the number of "chronically unemployed" is absolutely soaring. There simply are not nearly enough jobs for everyone.

Many of those who are able to get jobs are finding that they are making less money than they used to. In fact, an increasingly large percentage of Americans are working at low wage retail and service jobs.

But you can't raise a family on what you make flipping burgers at McDonald's or on what you bring in from greeting customers down at the local Wal-Mart.

The truth is that the middle class in America is dying -- and once it is gone it will be incredibly difficult to rebuild.
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2010 09:28 pm
@ican711nm,
Lie alert:
Quote:
The expression of the phrase I think by conservatives is usually preceded, included with, or followed by posts with considerable evidence. On the other hand, very little of what you, plainoldme, post, is accompanied by any evidence--before, within, or after.

0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2010 09:33 pm
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:

So corporations are moving operations out of the U.S. at breathtaking speed. Since the U.S. government does not penalize them for doing so, there really is no incentive for them to stay.

Beautiful example of liberal reasoning. pom thinks it is the government's job to penalize businesses that move jobs offshore, instead of creating a better business climate here that would reward them for staying here. The best incentive is rewards, not penalties, pom.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 07/18/2025 at 01:49:58