1
   

Dershowitz: US should launch preemptive strikes on civilians

 
 
candidone1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2008 08:27 am
Foofie wrote:
If it's your opinion that I am an apologist


No, it is your assertion that you are an apologist.

Foofie wrote:
My apology may be based on pure base triumphalism, reminiscent of Pax Romana.


I am not sure what relevence "triumphalism reminiscent of Pax Romana" has in any of your above responses....because last time I checked, the Roman Empire fell....and does triumphalism, by definition, also not apply to the terrorists/Islamic funadmentalists?
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2008 09:19 am
candidone1 wrote:
Foofie wrote:
If it's your opinion that I am an apologist


No, it is your assertion that you are an apologist.

Foofie wrote:
My apology may be based on pure base triumphalism, reminiscent of Pax Romana.


I am not sure what relevence "triumphalism reminiscent of Pax Romana" has in any of your above responses....because last time I checked, the Roman Empire fell....and does triumphalism, by definition, also not apply to the terrorists/Islamic funadmentalists?


You used the word apologist first. Any apology anyone chooses to interpret from my post is their interpretation. I should have put the word apology above in quotes.
0 Replies
 
candidone1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2008 09:28 am
Riiiiight.

Care to address the remainder of the post?
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2008 09:33 am
candidone1 wrote:
Riiiiight.

Care to address the remainder of the post?


No.
0 Replies
 
candidone1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2008 11:26 am
I thought not.
It was a bizarre, irrelevant, senseless and thoughtless post anyway.

Apparently you concur that it is not worth qualifying.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2008 03:28 pm
candidone1 wrote:
I thought not.
It was a bizarre, irrelevant, senseless and thoughtless post anyway.

Apparently you concur that it is not worth qualifying.


Nothing is "apparent" until you give us all the correct adjectives ("bizarre, irrelevant, senseless and thoughtless"). Very good Watson.
0 Replies
 
candidone1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Mar, 2008 04:05 pm
....don't want to qualify an earlier post, but wish to return to troll a bit?

Troll on.....
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 04/28/2024 at 11:12:03