0
   

Frustration at Primary without knowing complete "ticket."

 
 
Foofie
 
Reply Fri 29 Feb, 2008 11:36 am
Am I the only voter that is annoyed to vote at the Primary, because I don't know the complete ticket if my candidate wins? While I voted for McCain, I don't know if I could vote for him in the General Election if by some quirk he takes on a running mate that I have a strong negative opinion. I believe this feeling is showing itself (to me), since with the current administration, I thought, the Office of the Vice President seems to have had an apparent significant involvement with certain concerns. More so, perhaps, than many past Vice Presidents? So, why don't we have a complete ticket to vote for at the Primaries? Would it be that hard for candidates to at least give a list of their potential running mates? It's as though the Office of the Vice President has evolved to a more meaningful position. Shouldn't we therefore have the ability to vote on who will be in this office?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 668 • Replies: 6
No top replies

 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Feb, 2008 11:58 am
Why not vote on their entire slate of possible cabinet members too? Laughing

The Office of VP has very few offically defined responsibilities. Every VP gets something to do some of which are simply ceremonial, others affect policy. The person filling that role however, doesn't really have any say in what chores they are assigned. You are voting for the person who would do the actual assigning so, IMO, the VP choice is pretty much irrelevant at this point.

If McCain listed 10 possible choices would it affect whether or not you voted for him? You still wouldn't know which of the possibles would actually be chosen. What would you do if you really liked 5 of them and hated the other 5? I don't see how it would help in the primary process.
0 Replies
 
nappyheadedhohoho
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Feb, 2008 12:22 pm
I understand the frustration, though. I've heard many say they voted for Obama as more a vote against Hillary. Imagine how some of them would feel if she became his running mate.
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Feb, 2008 01:18 pm
If you trust the man to run the country, you should be able to trust him to pick a running mate.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Mar, 2008 09:04 am
Noddy24 wrote:
If you trust the man to run the country, you should be able to trust him to pick a running mate.


What do you base the above on? The two may be mutually exclusive, considering there is a Party that I thought has input into who is ready for national office (the VP spot).
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Mar, 2008 02:27 pm
Common sense and the executive ability to expect that a competent executive can delegate authority.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Mar, 2008 04:46 pm
To whom? That is the question!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Frustration at Primary without knowing complete "ticket."
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 06:42:06