Reply
Wed 27 Feb, 2008 09:26 am
Covering Badly-Injured Americans in Iraq
By Greg Mitchell, E & P
February 26, 2008
Four years ago today, I wrote about a true forerunner in bringing to light the plight of the forgotten injured. "My vote for Iraq reporter of the year goes to a low-profile journalist who did not cover the war itself and has never even been to Baghdad," I wrote "His name is Mark Benjamin."
As regular readers may know, I have written dozens of columns in the past nearly five years about the deaths of U.S. troops in Iraq, the badly wounded and their treatment, accidents and suicides -- and how all this has been covered, uncovered and mis-covered.
It took years for many in the media to deeply explore most of these issues. Exactly four years ago, I wrote about a true forerunner in this area.
"My vote for Iraq reporter of the year goes to a low-profile journalist who did not cover the war itself and has never even been to Baghdad," I wrote on February 27, 2004. "His name is Mark Benjamin, 33, and he serves as investigations editor for United Press International out of Washington, D.C.
"We have documented his work since last autumn, and now the heavy hitters ?- The New York Times and The Washington Post ?- are following his lead, taking a long look at the forgotten American victims of the war: the injured, the traumatized, and the suicides."
Benjamin now writes tough pieces for Salon.com.
The rest of that column -- written 3000 deaths and tens of thousands of injuries ago -- follows. Much on all these issues is found in my new book, "So Wrong for So Long: How the Press, the Pundits -- and the President -- Failed on Iraq" (Union Square Press), available from online booksellers now and in stores over the next two weeks.
It was quite a February for Benjamin. Early in the month he was awarded second prize in the annual Raymond Clapper Memorial Awards for Outstanding Washington Reporting. The judges cited, in particular, his work last October in revealing that hundreds of soldiers at Fort Stewart, Ga., were being kept in hot cement barracks without running water while they waited, for as long as months, for medical care. (Twelve days later he exposed ghastly conditions at Fort Knox in Kentucky.)
This was one of those rare stories that produced quick and measurable results rather than mere promises. Army Secretary Les Brownlee flew to Fort Stewart, new doctors were dispatched and within a month the barracks had been closed. Pentagon officials later declared they would spend $77 million this year to help returning troops get better treatment. And the media started paying more attention to the injured. Until then the 2,000 non-fatal casualties were rarely mentioned.
Benjamin also was one of the first reporters to link U.S. illnesses and deaths in Iraq (and elsewhere) to possible side effects of various vaccines. And he was first to closely analyze non-combat injuries and ailments in Iraq ?- a step E&P advocated as long ago as last July. Benjamin showed that one in five medical evacuations from Iraq were for neurological or psychiatric reasons. He followed that with a probe of the unnervingly high suicide rate among soldiers in Iraq, and also revealed that two returning soldiers had killed themselves at Walter Reed Medical Center in Washington (a fact the military had kept hidden).
Now these issues are finally gaining a wider airing.
In a Feb. 15 cover story for The New York Times Magazine, Sara Corbett profiled several badly-damaged veterans of the 101st Airborne Division, now back home and coping with "sleepless nights, restless days, fractured relationships and vials of pills that help with the pain ?- but not enough." The number of injured in Iraq now tops 3,000 (counting accidents) with more than 550 qualifying as psychiatric casualties. Due to body armor, fewer die in Iraq; they get to live another day, but without arms or legs, or working stomachs, or fully functioning brains.
More than 100,000 troops will return to the U.S. this year and many are likely to display the same symptoms of post-traumatic stress found in Vietnam vets. "There will be problems," one soldier, who came home without his right arm, told Corbett. "There'll be a lot of short fuses, a lot of intolerance. People are going to have to be patient with these guys."
Four days later, Theola Labbe in The Washington Post, in a front-page report, explored another one of Benjamin's pet issues. There have been at least 21 suicides among our troops in Iraq ?- well above normal rates for the Army ?- and this number does not include many others still under investigation, nor the two cases at Walter Reed and others on the home front. An Iraq vet recently killed himself at a Shoney's Inn in Tennessee, possibly by drinking antifreeze and Drain Pro, the Baltimore Sun reported last month.
Labbe added to these facts the wrenching testimony of the soldiers' families, who reported difficulties getting details on the deaths from the military. "We call them, we have questions, we want to know, and they don't have anything to tell us," one widow said. "They don't have nothing to say, and that's not right." The mother of another suicide drove around a nearby town for three hours on a tip that a sergeant who knew her dead son was home on leave (she didn't find him).
Why the high suicide rate? Trish Wood, a researcher for the Vietnam Veterans of America Foundation, told me recently, "The spike happened after Bush declared 'major combat operations' over. The troops found themselves in a very dangerous place, with no firm date that they would return home, surrounded by Iraqis who, if not hostile, were indifferent ?- certainly not bestowing the 'sweets and flowers' the Iraqi exiles and the administration had predicted."
And Mark Benjamin told me last week that he fears a "large cluster" of suicides in the coming months as tens of thousands of troops rotate home.
Handicapping The Pulitzers
Handicapping The Pulitzers: Walter Reed? Virginia Tech? China? And Likely Some Surprises
By Joe Strupp, E & P
Published: February 26, 2008
As Pulitzer Prize jurors prepare to gather next week in New York to sift through hundreds of submissions and find three finalists in each of the 14 journalism categories to nominate for the full board to consider in a month, speculation is mounting over which entries have the best chance.
On March 3, 4, and 5, the juries will peruse entries from the largest major dailies to small town community papers, with both print and Web elements in the running.
Some news events, such as the Virginia Tech massacre and the Minnesota bridge collapse, give a clear breaking news advantage to papers near those stories. A handful of investigative and in-depth projects, including several China-related probes, are also top contenders, based on interviews with a few jurors and a look at the other major awards already announced.
"Anyone could have predicted Katrina would be big [two years ago], and Virginia Tech will come up," says Cate Barron, managing editor of the Patriot-News in Harrisburg, Pa., who will serve her second stint as a juror next week. "But I come in with an open mind and I think everyone comes in without outside influence."
Kate Marymont, executive editor of The News-Press in Fort Myers, Fla., who served on the 2007 local reporting jury, says this year's crop has more outright contenders. "Last year was a more level playing field entering into it, not a lot of obvious standouts," she contends. Marymont adds that some clear favorites emerge this year: "The Walter Reed work, the bridge collapse are in that small circle."
Trying to handicap the awards, which are affected by a range of things -- from societal impact of a story or series to the quality of writing -- is something of a crapshoot. The increased use of online elements in the submissions has also changed the way the awards are handled, and entries reviewed.
"I think we can all identify the [favored] stories, but until you see the coverage, you don't know," says Ken Paulson, USA Today editor and a juror during the past two years. "I've always felt that the judges come in with an absolute open mind."
With all of that to consider, E&P attempts again to identify the cream of the newspaper crop.
A review of some of the preliminary awards, which often foretell Pulitzer success, as well as interviews with editors and current and former jurors, indicates some frontrunners have emerged.
-- Among the non-breaking news categories, two Washington Post submissions are clear favorites, both for their impact and award-winning track record thus far.
The Post's Dana Priest, already a Pulitzer winner two years ago for her revelations of secret prisons overseas, teamed with Anne Hull for the bombshell Walter Reed Army Medical Center expose that revealed widespread care and management problems at the military health care facility.
Priest and Hull sparked numerous inquiries and the eventual departure of a number of high-ranking Army officials, including Army Secretary Francis J. Harvey.
On Monday, the pair won the Selden Ring Prize for Investigative Reporting from the USC Annenberg School of Communications. The duo has also taken a finalist spot for the Shorenstein Center Goldsmith Prize for investigative reporting and won an American Society of Newspaper Editors (ASNE) distinguished writing award.
Priest and Hull have to be the frontrunners for either a public service, national reporting or investigative nod. "Everyone you talk to will mention Walter Reed," Paulson said.
-- Another Post notable is the in-depth series on Vice President Dick Cheney by Barton D. Gellman and Jo Becker, which won a George Polk Award and a Goldsmith Prize finalist notice.
-- Several New York Times projects have received nods and are likely contenders in the national, investigative or explanatory categories. Walt Bogdanich and Jake Hooker are Goldsmith Prize and Selden Ring finalists for "A Toxic Pipeline," their report on diethylene glycol, a toxin imported from China for use in anti-freeze that is found to be suspected of killing hundreds around the Globe.
David Gonzalez, meanwhile, took home an ASNE award for a three-part series on Pentecostalism, while fellow Times scribe Charles A. Duhigg garnered a recent Polk Award for an in-depth look at unethical practices by nursing homes and related institutions.
-- Also re:China was Shai Oster of The Wall Street Journal's reporting on China's Three Gorges Dam construction, a Polk award winner that could see success as a Pulitzer foreign news winner, explanatory contender or investigative honoree. Oster looked at the impact of the project on local environmental issues.
-- Another China angle came from the Chicago Tribune, with its revelations about injuries and death resulting from unregulated products imported from China, ranging from dangerous cribs to lead-tainted toys. That series already has won a Polk Award and gotten Selden Ring finalist consideration, as well as sparking a nationwide review of the problem.
-- In a related story, the Salt Lake Tribune has been given a Shorenstein finalist spot for its coverage of the dangers in Chinese factories of carcinogens used in making many of the recalled products.
-- Several other investigative projects that could be found as Pulitzer contenders in a number of categories include: The Palm Beach Post, a Shorenstein finalist for its investigation into a Palm Beach County corruption scandal; Jerry Mitchell of The Clarion-Ledger in Jackson, Miss., for revealing poor reporting of disease outbreaks and infant mortality by Mississippi state officials; and the Charlotte (N.C.) Observer's expose of local housing foreclosure problems.
Mitchell, a Pulitzer finalist in 2006, and the Observer's staff, have both already won Polk Awards for their work on these subjects.
-- Few major Iraq-related stories or series are jumping to the head of the Pulitzer lists, although McClatchy Newspapers long-respected Baghdad bureau got recognition with a Polk Award for Leila Fadel, McClatchy's latest in a string of worthy Baghdad bureau chiefs.
-- The classic breaking news award story could be the Virginia Tech massacre, last April's deadly shooting that left 33 people dead on the college campus. The local Roanoke (Va.) Times brought attention for its blog-type initial approach and, later, emphasis on emotional and local impact. The Washington Post and Richmond (Va.) Times-Dispatch also covered the incident and its aftermath heavily, with the Post utilizing numerous inside sources.
The Virginia Tech paper, the Collegiate Times, meanwhile, has been noted as being Pulitzer-worthy for its expanded coverage, both online and print, which broke several stories, including first lists of the dead and other inside details. The paper also succeeded in giving campus faculty and students deep daily information on everything from grief counseling to scheduling updates.
-- Another breaking news contender is the August bridge collapse in Minnesota's Twin Cities. Both The Star Tribune of Minneapolis and the St. Paul Pioneer Press drew accolades for going all out on the story, with Web coverage and follow-ups in print and online. Both papers, as well as numerous national outlets, also focused on the lengthy list of bridges and structures nationwide later found to have been deemed unsafe or deficient.
-- A dark horse breaking news contender might be The Post & Courier in Charleston, S.C., which recently won the ASNE prize for deadline reporting on the June sofa store fire that killed nine firefighters. The Omaha (Neb.) World-Herald, meanwhile, won a finalist award from ASNE for its coverage of the December mall shooting that resulted in eight deaths.
-- Several southern California papers may receive attention for the most recent wildfires there, particularly near San Diego. The top local dailies utilized web options to keep readers up to date and to post some riveting photos that are likely to be up for the two Pulitzer photo categories.
CARTOONING: Look for Mike Thompson of the Detroit Free Press and Copley News Service to have an excellent chance. He was a finalist the past two years and as E&P recently noted in a print story, he began doing breaking-news animations in 2007.
Also of note in the cartoon category is John Sherffius of The Boulder (Col.) Camera, who won the $10,000 Herblock Prize last week. He's one of the most visually striking cartoonists out there and often conveys his points in memorably symbolic ways without using too many words. Then there is Ann Telnaes of Cartoonists & Writers Syndicate, who won a Pulitzer in 2001, but has one of the most interesting drawing styles of any cartoonist. She is also doing Web animation, which Pulitzer judges have shown makes a difference.
COMMENTARY: This category, which has always remained wide open, has a few slight favorites. Eugene Robinson of The Washington Post, who has written a syndicated column for only a few years, has emerged as a contender due to his in-depth reporting and clear style.
Leonard Pitts Jr. of The Miami Herald and Tribune Media Services and Connie Schultz of The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and Creators Syndicate, both won recently, in 2004 and 2005, respectively. But each has gotten accolades for 2007 work, with Pitts winning the ASNE commentary prize and Schultz taking a finalist award in that competition.
Paul Krugman of The New York Times also had a much-noted 2007 and could symbolize the kind of anti-Bush liberal view many columnists have waged. Joe Nocera, a Times business columnist, was a finalist last year and continues to gain support as financial-related news expands.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace