1
   

How Bush’s Fiscal Mismanagement Produced a Recession

 
 
Reply Sat 26 Jan, 2008 09:49 am
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,190 • Replies: 29
No top replies

 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Jan, 2008 12:32 pm
Only 1 problem....WE"RE NOT IN A RECESSION!!!
0 Replies
 
High Seas
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Jan, 2008 01:03 pm
Only 2 problems with
Quote:
How Bush's Fiscal Mismanagement Produced a Recession


....first, what Woiyo said about "recession", second problem being with "fiscal mismanagement": by law and fact fiscal policy is a job for the Congress....
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Jan, 2008 06:00 pm
The best quote from this German ZEIT is this.

It’s hard to find meaningful analytical discussion in America’s mainstream media.
How could it hope to compete with the latest Paris Hilton story, or some flub-up by an exhausted presidential candidate out on the hustings?

Viewers and readers don’t want to be worried by it, they reason.

They’re wrong, of course. The level of anxiety and concern among the public is high, as is concern and coverage in the quality press around the world.

The curious standout is the mainstream media in the United States.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Jan, 2008 06:11 pm
unless we are operating on a new definition of "recession" such as "the economic rate of growth is slowing" then I have to say there is NO recession that anyone can blame anyone else for.
On the other hand, the winter here has been drier and less precipitation than usual which is probably due to an increasing population of liberal democrat socialist communists moving into northern New Mexico.
0 Replies
 
High Seas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Jan, 2008 02:32 pm
Dys - the definition has changed: peak to trough is the new criterion >

Quote:
The committee views real GDP as the single best measure of aggregate economic activity. In determining whether a recession has occurred and in identifying the approximate dates of the peak and the trough,

http://www.nber.org/cycles/recessions.html

> but as nobody adjusts the inflation-adjusted GDP to allow for the new definition of inflation, nobody knows for sure until much later.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Jan, 2008 02:43 pm
You want to see a recession? I the country has the short sightedness of electing either of the left leaning liberals that are running for office, there will be a recession the likes of which most of us have not seen in our lifetimes.

I don't ever want to see it, but all these "do gooders" will be singing a different tune when the stock market and business in general goes right into the crapper. "A chicken in every pot" sounds admirable, but if you don't encourage business, we will all be eating hot dogs and beans!
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Jan, 2008 05:16 pm
Sorry for my interruption.
USA is not the only country in the world to project or protect the values and many countries are not with Compassionate,
credit-card-cum -flag -waving,
consume-oriented
uncontrolled corporate capitalism.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Jan, 2008 05:22 pm
Ive seen the shpinm eisters of Das BushReich say that
"our rate of economic growth is projected to be slightly negative to stable over the next 3 quarters"
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Jan, 2008 05:44 pm
I am of the opinion that USA's system is faulty- to put it mildly- or a system which is not congenial for the local natives besides the global innocents.
By charging BUSH's noble achievement which surpass the achievement of his idols or his father will not never make the life of decent people happy.
The so called unbridled/uncontrolled/free-for-a-few corporate market economy will make the world more wretched and despicable.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2008 10:08 am
Phoenix
Phoenix32890 wrote:
You want to see a recession? I the country has the short sightedness of electing either of the left leaning liberals that are running for office, there will be a recession the likes of which most of us have not seen in our lifetimes.

I don't ever want to see it, but all these "do gooders" will be singing a different tune when the stock market and business in general goes right into the crapper. "A chicken in every pot" sounds admirable, but if you don't encourage business, we will all be eating hot dogs and beans!


Phoenix, I know you are a smart woman but I'm surprised that you ascribe to the old "liberal myth" that liberals kill business. The exact opposite is true. Liberals encourage ethical and constructive businesses benefitting the Common Good. They can tell the difference between honest businesses and corrupt businesses and their leaders. What is wrong with that?

If you review the history of the stock market, it has been shown over decades that it generally does better when Democrats are governing than when Reublicans are in power, depending on the lack of some serious national and/or international event having a negative impact on the economy. The anti-regulation greedy rascals do great harm to the economy when their unrestrained capitalism gets out of hand as Republicans close their eyes to their destructive behavior. As long as they get theirs, the hell with everyone else, including the U.S. economy.

Here is one example:
http://www.ilim.com/inthemarket/viewcontent.asp?LinkName=inTheMarket&id=43

BBB
0 Replies
 
High Seas
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 Jan, 2008 11:07 am
Quote:
If you review the history of the stock market, it has been shown over decades that it generally does better when Democrats are governing than when Reublicans are in power............


That's flat-out wrong.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 Jan, 2008 11:10 am
High Seas wrote:
Quote:
If you review the history of the stock market, it has been shown over decades that it generally does better when Democrats are governing than when Reublicans are in power............


That's flat-out wrong.


Sorry, but you are flat out wrong.

BBB
0 Replies
 
High Seas
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 Jan, 2008 11:12 am
BBB - truly your statement is wrong, and your persistence in it (without the least pretense of providing a source) laughable.

The Irish link you provided has no connection to what you claim, btw.
0 Replies
 
High Seas
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 Jan, 2008 11:14 am
P. S. In the interest of maintaining some modicum of courtesy online, may I note that my references are to "your statement" and not "to you". A similar wording on your part would be appreciated, as would any effort on your part to try and understand what you write before you post.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 Jan, 2008 11:29 am
HighSeas
Highseas, here are a few more expert opinions that counter the old myth that the stock market does better under republican administrations. The opposite is true.---BBB

http://www.frbsf.org/econrsrch/wklyltr/wklyltr98/el98-19.html

http://money.cnn.com/2004/01/21/markets/election_demsvreps/index.htm

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B07E6DD143BF933A15752C1A9659C8B63
0 Replies
 
High Seas
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 Jan, 2008 11:46 am
Please read what you link before posting....... Your very first link makes it plain that
".............Using data for the period 1871 to 1997, we find that the stock returns are almost identical under Democratic and Republican administrations. .............. the returns have not been statistically different when Democrats or Republicans occupy the White House."


http://www.economagic.com/gif/g65088088015511393336433306316614.gif


That's the series. Final Smile
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 Jan, 2008 11:50 am
aside from the seque (democrats vs republicans and the economy) i fail to understand how anyone can describe our current economy as "in recession." Perhaps I am just dense and too many years away from my education.
0 Replies
 
High Seas
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 Jan, 2008 11:51 am
Here's how to get the chart from Economagic:

Quote:
This series starts in 1896/5/27 and ends in 2005/10/21

Show recessions

Do not show grid

Original is called: Dow Jones Industrial Average: Close

Transformations on Right Scale: Logs
0 Replies
 
High Seas
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 Jan, 2008 11:54 am
Dys - in the past (see pink vertical areas in chart posted) recessions were indicated by the old statistical definition. The new definition (see NBER link on previous page) takes several months to finalize calculation.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » How Bush’s Fiscal Mismanagement Produced a Recession
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/09/2024 at 06:30:14