As if one can ingest a maximum of Merchant-Ivory! Pish tosh!
Following along and wow, didn't know Austin Pendleton was writing! I do hope you get to see the show, and do, yes read Rhinoceros before it. It was such a classic of the absurdist theater--I well remember the transformation of Zero Mostel into this lumbering Rhino by the end of the play. Quite something.
I recall an entire summer where I read nothing but Theater of the Absurd plays. Made for an interesting commute...although it took a few minutes to come back to earth and the Lackawanna railroad!
Found this interesting comparison in a website on Ionesco:
These, and other characteristics of Ionesco's works can be related to Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. Daisy's reasoning is similar to that of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern often make assumptions based on what seems like irrelevant information. For example, one morning Rosencrantz says, "That's west unless we're off course, in which case it's night." This statement is not logical. The direction they are traveling has nothing to do with whether it is night or day. Statements similar to the confusing statements found in Ionesco's plays, such as The Bald Soprano are also evident in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. One conversation between Rosencrantz and Guildenstern goes like this:
Guildenstern: Why?
Rosencrantz: Exactly.
Guildenstern: Exactly what?
Rosencrantz: Exactly, why.
Guildenstern: Exactly why what?
Rosencrantz: What?
Guildenstern: Why?
Rosencrantz: Why what, exactly?
Guildenstern: Why is he mad?!
Rosencrantz: I don't know!
Stoppard is one of my favorites anyway, but it was interesting to see them compared; I never really thought of him being a part of Absurdist Theater...but what was I thinking?