0
   

Let's get behind this Huckabee fellow...

 
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 04:31 am
He also meant to say "Sold core peaches" or "Sore Mold Bleachs" or "Bold Boer Beachs". One of those.

You know Putin.

Joe(He says the 'beaches' one a lot.)Nation
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 12:55 pm
Joe Nation wrote:
Quote:
Mysteryman: you might want to recall President Reagan's famous testimony regarding the Iran-Contra Scandal -that's right, the one in which he testified 130 times that he didn't remember or couldn't recall, mostly because he couldn't recall or remember.

Quote:
Then why would you want Hillary as President?
After all, during the investigation into the Rose Law firm billing records, she said "I dont know" or "I dont remember" to EVERY question she was asked.
She showed her paranoia when she claimed a "vast right wing conspiracy" was out to get her husband when the Lewinski story broke.

Using the same logic you used in your quote I copied, Hillary cannot serve as President either.


MM, One doesn't connect to the other. I gave Reagan's words as an example of dotage which it was, the poor dope was in a bad state, but besides that, he was testifying in regard to an assault on our Constitution, OUR Constitution, MM. He was testifying in regard to clearly illegal acts made during his Presidency that, had he still been President, might have led to his impeachment. You do remember that, right?

EVERYONE I know that served in the WH or at Camp David during Reagans two terms all say the same thing.
His mind was working fine, and he was as saharp as a tack.
There was no dotage at all.
I prefer to believe people that actually saw and knew him over people that just want to throw stones and make wild accusations.
So, until you can provide medical evidence about him during his presidency that shows he had Alzheimers then, I wont accept your word for it.


He signed the Presidential Findings but failed to remember doing so? He authorized funding for a covert war that had been specifically, with, I might add, bi-partisan support, de-funded and de-authorized by Act of Congress. This is not exactly akin to forgetting a dental appointment.

And I know you are still hoping for something, anything, to come out of Whitewater, you poor thing, but it's really over. Nearly 100 million dollars of our money, OUR money, MM, was spent to quiet the howls of the rightwing wolves. It's ironic that you would use 'paranoia' because if anyone was paranoid, and a bit manic, during that time, it was the Richard Scaife's moneyed rightwing operatives.. The conspiricy, really more like a movement but that term gives it some dignity, was to find some way, any way, legal or otherwise, to remove Bill Clinton from the White House. They tried to commit a coupe d'etat by scandal mongering and lies. Not exactly the American way, but the rightwing has never claimed any motive except to increase it's power. What Constitution?
They almost succeeded, but not from their own efforts, the hounddog met up with Monica and left the gate open. Idiot. Not you. Bill.

As far as the Whitewater investigation goes, I said then and I say it again now, it was a collosal waste of time and money.
But that still doesnt change the fact that Hillary had total amnesia when it came to answering questions about it.
What was she hiding, and why did she refuse to tell the truth?
Or, was it dotage on her part?
You say there is a difference, I say that she was trying to hide something and didnt want to be honest.
If she did that then, why do you think she wont get amnesia if she gets elected?



I don't agree with Hillary on a number of things, but if anyone has had her steel tempered, she's the one. Just as John McCain had to learn and be prepared for the lies from the right, I think she is ready for the onslaught of filth and mud to come.

She probably is, , and I am willing to bet that she will throw as much or more of the filth and mud.
Just look at the garbage she has tried so far this election.

Joe(I just wonder about the rest of us.)Nation
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 02:13 pm
Quote:
What was she hiding, and why did she refuse to tell the truth?


MM: You would have been great during the Inquisition. There may be a spot for you at Guantanamo.

Oh, the accused says she doesn't recall.
Put her on the rack until she does recall.
(Wha?)

You haven't got one iota of evidence from any source that proves she was hiding anything.

Quote:
Why did she refuse to tell the truth?

Just how dense are you? Was there ever even the threat of any withholding of evidence charges or perjury charges against Hillary Clinton during that whole debacle?

Uh, that would be a NO.

I'm not sure if I am going to vote for her, I'm still listening to all the candidates, but she has impressed me as someone who is tough enough for the job.

Lookit, you don't like her. Good. She doesn't need your help, but it would be nice if you just stop having delusions about her.

As for Reagan's mind, I know what I saw and heard during his testimony.


So, we move on now. Or I do anyway.

So.

How do you feel about the Republican race getting down to two horses after Florida's primary?
Rudy will be out with Mike(I have no money)Huckabee right behind him. So it will really be just Mitt and John.

Which of Mitt's flips do you like the best?
A) That he's ALWAYS been pro-life.
B) That he's Always been pro-gun.
C) That he's Always been a friend of the working man.

Joe(I think he's battery-operated)Nation
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 02:40 pm
Quote:
How do you feel about the Republican race getting down to two horses after Florida's primary?
Rudy will be out with Mike(I have no money)Huckabee right behind him. So it will really be just Mitt and John.

Which of Mitt's flips do you like the best?
A) That he's ALWAYS been pro-life.
B) That he's Always been pro-gun.
C) That he's Always been a friend of the working man.

Joe(I think he's battery-operated)Nation


To be honest, I havent paid much attention to the race at all yet, on either the repub or dem side.

I have said several times that there were to many voices in the choir.
By that I meant that there were to many people running to make it worth paying attention to.

Now that some of the minor candidates, or those that had no shot at winning, are out of the race, I will start paying more attention to it.

I will take your word about Mitt's flips, I havent paid enough attention to him to know his position on anything yet.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 03:16 pm
Just so that I am clear: you haven't paid any attention to most interesting race for President in fifty years.

Joe(come on.)Nation
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 03:39 pm
The Edwards Flip Flop Record
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jan, 2008 04:35 pm


Golly..

Joe (I wonder why he is running a distant third)Nation
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Jan, 2008 08:48 am
Joe Nation wrote:
Just so that I am clear: you haven't paid any attention to most interesting race for President in fifty years.

Joe(come on.)Nation


I didnt say that.
I said I havent paid MUCH attention to the race yet.
There is a difference.

With so many people running, they were, IMHO, drowning each other out with what they were saying.
Now that the field on both sides has been winnowed some, I will start paying more attention.
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Jan, 2008 10:55 am
mysteryman wrote:
Joe Nation wrote:
Just so that I am clear: you haven't paid any attention to most interesting race for President in fifty years.

Joe(come on.)Nation


I didnt say that.
I said I havent paid MUCH attention to the race yet.
There is a difference.

With so many people running, they were, IMHO, drowning each other out with what they were saying.
Now that the field on both sides has been winnowed some, I will start paying more attention.



Well, whenever you decide that it's worth your time to look at these candidates, I'd be curious to know your answer his question too.
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Jan, 2008 11:00 am
MM, in response to your defense of Reagan let me get this straight.

Reagan did say "I can't remember" (or something similar) over 100 times during his testamony.
At this point in time, Reagan was not affected by his alzheimers.
Therefore, Reagan simply couldn't remember, but was of sound mind and body and a great model for our society.


Clinton did say "I can't remember" (or something similar) a lot during the WW testamony.
At this point in time, Clinton was not affected by alzheimers.
Therefore, Clinton is a lying scumbag who deserves to rot in hell for her sins against humanity.


Does that about sum it up?
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Jan, 2008 01:16 pm
maporsche wrote:
Therefore, Clinton is a lying scumbag who deserves to rot in hell for her sins against humanity.


Does that about sum it up?


No ... Clinton is a lying scumbag for other reasons.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Jan, 2008 02:08 pm
Talking about lying scumbags and immoral scumbags and ... .
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Jan, 2008 07:50 pm
Ticomaya wrote:
maporsche wrote:
Therefore, Clinton is a lying scumbag who deserves to rot in hell for her sins against humanity.


Does that about sum it up?


No ... Clinton is a lying scumbag for other reasons.


What lies. And be very specific.

Joe(jerkcough)Nation
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Jan, 2008 08:36 pm
Joe Nation wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
maporsche wrote:
Therefore, Clinton is a lying scumbag who deserves to rot in hell for her sins against humanity.


Does that about sum it up?


No ... Clinton is a lying scumbag for other reasons.


What lies. And be very specific.

Joe(jerkcough)Nation


I was all ramped up to do that for you, Joe -- but then I thought I might make sure you understood I was referring to Billy Boy, not the Missus.

If you want me to recount Billy's lies, I'm just waiting for your nod.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Jan, 2008 10:15 pm
Quote:


George W. Bush is famous for his attachment to a painting which he acquired after becoming a "born again Christian." It's by W.H.D. Koerner and is entitled "A Charge to Keep." Bush was so taken by it, that he took the painting's name for his own official autobiography. And here's what he says about it:

I thought I would share with you a recent bit of Texas history which epitomizes our mission. When you come into my office, please take a look at the beautiful painting of a horseman determinedly charging up what appears to be a steep and rough trail. This is us. What adds complete life to the painting for me is the message of Charles Wesley that we serve One greater than ourselves.

So in Bush's view (or perhaps I should say, faith) the key figure, with whom he personally identifies, is a missionary spreading the word of the Methodist Christianity in the American West in the late nineteenth century.

...



[Bush] came to believe that the picture depicted the circuit-riders who spread Methodism across the Alleghenies in the nineteenth century. In other words, the cowboy who looked like Bush was a missionary of his own denomination.

Only that is not the title, message, or meaning of the painting. The artist, W.H.D. Koerner, executed it to illustrate a Western short story entitled "The Slipper Tongue," published in The Saturday Evening Post in 1916. The story is about a smooth-talking horse thief who is caught, and then escapes a lynch mob in the Sand Hills of Nebraska. The illustration depicts the thief fleeing his captors. In the magazine, the illustration bears the caption: "Had His Start Been Fifteen Minutes Longer He Would Not Have Been Caught."

So Bush's inspiring, prosyletizing Methodist is in fact a silver-tongued horse thief fleeing from a lynch mob. It seems a fitting marker for the Bush presidency.

Bush has consistently exhibited what psychologists call the "Tolstoy syndrome." That is, he is completely convinced he knows what things are, so he shuts down all avenues of inquiry about them and disregards the information that is offered to him. This is the hallmark of a tragically bad executive. But in this case, it couldn't be more precious. The president of the United States has identified closely with a man he sees as a mythic, heroic figure. But in fact he's a wily criminal one step out in front of justice. It perfectly reflects Bush the man. . . and Bush the president.

http://harpers.org/archive/2008/01/hbc-90002237




Karma or what.

The Tolstoy Syndrome perfectly describes the ticos, mcgs, mms and the georgeob1s of the world. The only possible explanation that would have 31% actually still supporting this idiot.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Jan, 2008 04:54 am
Ticomaya wrote:
Joe Nation wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
maporsche wrote:
Therefore, Clinton is a lying scumbag who deserves to rot in hell for her sins against humanity.


Does that about sum it up?


No ... Clinton is a lying scumbag for other reasons.


What lies. And be very specific.

Joe(Yeah, that will happen*) Nation


I was all ramped up to do that for you, Joe -- but then I thought I might make sure you understood I was referring to Billy Boy, not the Missus.

If you want me to recount Billy's lies, I'm just waiting for your nod.


So, even though maporsche says HER sins against humanity....??? You still can't take you eyes off "Billy Boy". I know Obama says he can't tell sometimes who he is running against, but I thought you were smarter than him.

You want to try again and keep the parties straight? Or does 'the missus' get a pass from you?

Joe(*previous epithet removed so as to not offend the gentle reader)Nation
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Jan, 2008 09:26 am
Joe Nation wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
I was all ramped up to do that for you, Joe -- but then I thought I might make sure you understood I was referring to Billy Boy, not the Missus.

If you want me to recount Billy's lies, I'm just waiting for your nod.


So, even though maporsche says HER sins against humanity....??? You still can't take you eyes off "Billy Boy". I know Obama says he can't tell sometimes who he is running against, but I thought you were smarter than him.

You want to try again and keep the parties straight? Or does 'the missus' get a pass from you?

Joe(*previous epithet removed so as to not offend the gentle reader)Nation


"Clinton is a lying scumbag" is a true statement. Whether maporsche was referring to the missus, or not, does not affect the truth of the statement. She's the one unfortunate enough to be married to the lout and share his last name.

Two "Clintons" gave concession speeches last night, so keeping straight which is the candidate is a more difficult task than you indicate.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Jan, 2008 09:57 am
maporsche wrote:
MM, in response to your defense of Reagan let me get this straight.

Reagan did say "I can't remember" (or something similar) over 100 times during his testamony.
At this point in time, Reagan was not affected by his alzheimers.
Therefore, Reagan simply couldn't remember, but was of sound mind and body and a great model for our society.


Clinton did say "I can't remember" (or something similar) a lot during the WW testamony.
At this point in time, Clinton was not affected by alzheimers.
Therefore, Clinton is a lying scumbag who deserves to rot in hell for her sins against humanity.


Does that about sum it up?


No, you missed the point.
If Reagan was starting to show the effect of alzheimers for saying "I dont remember" during his testimony, then we must apply the same standard to Hillary during her testimony.

So, she must obviously be suffering the early effect of alzheimers also, because of her constant use of phrase "I dont remember".

So if she is suffering from an early form of alzheimers, do we really want her to be president?

maporsche...

Quote:
Well, whenever you decide that it's worth your time to look at these candidates, I'd be curious to know your answer his question too.


After the Florida primary is when I will start paying serious attention to the campaigns.
By then, I figure that most of the secondary candidates will have dropped out, and the real candidates can take the stage.

What question are you refering to?
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Jan, 2008 01:31 pm
Ticomaya wrote:

Two "Clintons" gave concession speeches last night, so keeping straight which is the candidate is a more difficult task than you indicate.



Only for the severely intellectually challenged.

You're hardly in a position to be calling anybody a lying scumbag.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Feb, 2008 05:33 am
Huckabee is such a sweetheart.

Just when you think he is done, he says this:'

"There are only ten basic laws that we need."
-- Mike Huckabee, on legal reform

Joe(and a few regulations on foodstuffs from Leviticus)Nation
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.3 seconds on 05/23/2025 at 10:29:02