1
   

private lives?

 
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jan, 2008 04:54 pm
Re: private lives?
Walter Hinteler wrote:
flaja wrote:
The land of Prussia is notoriously worthless for agricultural purposes. By early 1930s many of the Junker nobles were bankrupt. The Reichstag had prepared a secret report detailing the Osthilfe, a program whereby the government would make loans to the bankrupt Junkers with no intention of ever collecting repayment.


Prussia was no 'land' but a 'Free State'.
And the biggest agricultural producer in the German Reich - which is surpring when you look at map:

http://i11.tinypic.com/6xrw2yo.jpg


Isn't your map the country of Prussia after Bismark? Isn't the modern state of Prussia within the Bundesrepublik rather small? Didn't Prussia start out as a very small geopolitical entity- essentially the Honhenzollern family farm?
0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jan, 2008 05:00 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Setanta wrote:
Don't try to confuse Herr Flaja with mere facts, Walter . . . that's very rude.


Well, sometimes I really forget it. (Especially that he studied German and history).

(Psscht: they collected all the fake items about the Titanic and the other British Olympic-class ocean liners in the Liverpool maritime museum)


Titanic was owned by an American company and thus was an American ship even though it was registered as a British ship for the purposes of international law. It was always assumed that the inside of Titanic reflected its British status. But this isn't true. The British call elevators "lifts", and it was always assumed that the elevators on Titanic were called lifts. However, one of James Cameron's expeditions to the wreck of Titanic found the 1st class elevators and they were marked elevators. Evidently White Star expected most of Titanic's 1st class passengers to be American and it used American, rather than British, terminology. In this regard Titanic was built to American design specifications.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jan, 2008 05:03 pm
Re: private lives?
flaja wrote:
Walter Hinteler wrote:
flaja wrote:
The land of Prussia is notoriously worthless for agricultural purposes. By early 1930s many of the Junker nobles were bankrupt. The Reichstag had prepared a secret report detailing the Osthilfe, a program whereby the government would make loans to the bankrupt Junkers with no intention of ever collecting repayment.


Prussia was no 'land' but a 'Free State'.
And the biggest agricultural producer in the German Reich - which is surpring when you look at map:

http://i11.tinypic.com/6xrw2yo.jpg


Isn't your map the country of Prussia after Bismark? Isn't the modern state of Prussia within the Bundesrepublik rather small? Didn't Prussia start out as a very small geopolitical entity- essentially the Honhenzollern family farm?


Update: There is no state of Prussia in the Federal Republic.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jan, 2008 05:04 pm
Re: private lives?
And by the way, flaja: did you think this here

http://i11.tinypic.com/6xrw2yo.jpg

was the Federal Republic of Germany? I mean, seriously?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jan, 2008 05:05 pm
Titanic was designed by William Pirrie, Thomas Andrews, and Alexander Carlisle, who were, respectively, the Chairman of Harland and Wolff shipyards, the head of the design department, and the General Manager.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jan, 2008 05:07 pm
OE, Herr Flaja is what was referred to in hippie days as an all-day trip . . . some of the best free entertainment online . . .
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jan, 2008 05:09 pm
Setanta wrote:
OE, Herr Flaja is what was referred to in hippie days as an all-day trip . . . some of the best free entertainment online . . .


I'm just constantly amazed. He's so serious about everything he says.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jan, 2008 05:13 pm
He's an expert on Germany, too, OE. If you ever have any questions about Germany (and i know there's thousands of things you have always wanted to know about Germany), don't hesitate to ask Herr Flaja . . . he knows it all ! ! !
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jan, 2008 05:13 pm
I think flaja is confusing the Mark of Brandenburg, the area around Berlin which is noted for its sandy soil, and Prussia. The two are not the same. Compounding the confusion is the fact that there are two ways to define "Prussia:" there's the area of the duchy and county (Markgrafschaft) of Prussia (often called East Prussia) that is now split between Russia (Kaliningrad) and Poland, and then there's the Kingdom of Prussia, which encompassed a large part of northern Germany and was ruled by the Hohenzollern dynasty. Ducal/Comital Prussia was, as far as I know, not regarded as a poor agricultural region, although some of the Hohenzollern monarchs had to induce foreigners to settle there (as King Frederick William I did with the Salzburg Protestants). The Kingdom of Prussia, of course, stretched across a wide variety of regions, some of which were quite fecund.

Walter's map, by the way, shows the state of Prussia during the Weimar period (which, I suppose, means that there's a third way to define "Prussia"). That incarnation of Prussia includes most of the Kingdom of Prussia during the imperial era (1870-1918) but doesn't include the areas ceded to Poland and a few bits ceded to Belgium and Denmark in the aftermath of the First World War.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jan, 2008 05:21 pm
joefromchicago wrote:
. . . there's the area of the duchy and county (Markgrafschaft) of Prussia (often called East Prussia) that is now split between Russia (Kaliningrad) and Poland, . . .


The Sweetiepie Girl's mother is a native of Königsberg (actually, of a suburban village), and a few years ago, she and Hamburger did a Baltic cruise, and wished to visit Königsberg/Kaliningrad. It just made the Girl's mother sad, though, because she was not allowed to enter, for reasons i can't explain here, having to do with the Soviet occupation at the end of the war.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jan, 2008 05:28 pm
joefromchicago wrote:
Walter's map, by the way, shows the state of Prussia during the Weimar period (which, I suppose, means that there's a third way to define "Prussia"). That incarnation of Prussia includes most of the Kingdom of Prussia during the imperial era (1870-1918) but doesn't include the areas ceded to Poland and a few bits ceded to Belgium and Denmark in the aftermath of the First World War.



The Länder of the Weimar Republic. Given the year flaja mentioned in his first post, I'd say this is the region he'd been referring to:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Deutsches_Reich2.png/597px-Deutsches_Reich2.png

The Free State of Prussia is the big blue thingie. East Prussia is the one on the right - Ostpreußen in the map.


edit: the dotted red line shows the borders of the German Empire in 1914. For a really big map click here.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jan, 2008 05:52 pm
If we were to give serious responses to this drivel by Flaja, it would be worth noting that Hindenburg did all that the could to avoid appointing Hitler. When he became disenchanted with Brüning, he tried to get him to move his government to the right. Brüning resigned, and was replaced by von Papen, whose government lost a vote of no confidence. A new election was held, and the NSDAP actually lost seats, but still remained the largest party in the Reichstag. Then von Papen held another election, and the NSDAP secured the most seats they had ever held. Now von Papen lost another vote of no confidence, and wanted to hold yet another election, and when Hindenburg lost the support of the military, he refused to hold the election, and appointed General Kurt von Schleicher, but in the face of the NSDAP's large bloc, and no support from the DNVP and von Papen, his (Schleicher's) efforts to form a government also eventually failed.

Hitler was not appointed chancellor until all of Hindenburg's efforts to form a government around another political leader failed. When van Papen threw his own support and that of most of the DNVP behind the NSDAP and Hitler, Hindenburg had no choice but to appoint Hitler. Herr Flaja's fairy tale about bribery and venality is entertaining, but has no basis in fact. Hindenburg responded to politically inescapable realities.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jan, 2008 06:56 pm
Setanta wrote-

Quote:
Königsberg


They sell that in our pub. Not much of it because it's piss and expensive as well. The ads are not bad though.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jan, 2008 11:15 pm
Re: private lives?
flaja wrote:
Didn't Prussia start out as a very small geopolitical entity- essentially the Honhenzollern family farm?


Now it gets really funny.

But you never know how people can mix things up.

The family farm of the Hohenzollern was (later known as the county/principality) Hohenzollern-Hechingen. In 1021. (Today Baden-Würtemberg.)

Then, they added some parts in and around Nuremberg to their territory. (~1100). Added some more counties around there (what is nowadays Bavaria).
Got some counties in Brandenburg and became marquis in Brandenburg (~1400).
Friedrich III then became King in Prussia etc etc

Oh, and I certainly chose that first map and that period by the years flaja gave.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jan, 2008 11:22 pm
flaja wrote:

Titanic was owned by an American company and thus was an American ship even though it was registered as a British ship for the purposes of international law. It was always assumed that the inside of Titanic reflected its British status. But this isn't true. The British call elevators "lifts", and it was always assumed that the elevators on Titanic were called lifts. However, one of James Cameron's expeditions to the wreck of Titanic found the 1st class elevators and they were marked elevators. Evidently White Star expected most of Titanic's 1st class passengers to be American and it used American, rather than British, terminology. In this regard Titanic was built to American design specifications.


And certainly that's why the Olympic and Britannic became British troop-transporters ...
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jan, 2008 11:40 pm
Re: private lives?
It was mentioned here before already and thus I deleted my response re flaja's claims about "Prussia".

flaja wrote:

I wasn't talking about the geopolitical entity of Prussia, but rather the dirt of Prussia. And while Prussia may have the highest production of any Land (i.e., state) in the Federal Republic this is only because of its physical size. Prussia's soil is not very fertile. Acre for acre other Laender are more productive.


What you call "the dirt of Prussia" might have been what is known as "the Holy Empire of German Nation's box of sand" - the Brandenburg Marches have contemptuously been called so. That's not the historical Prussia but what was the 'heartland' of the later Prussia.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jan, 2008 07:10 am
In a first year Canadian history course I took a long time ago, in a discussion we were having after studying some primary and secondary sources, one youngish male student began to argue with the class TA on the details of the relevant historical event or trend. "What you and 'these people' are saying isnt right," he insisted. The TA inquired why he thought this way. He answered that "It's much different in the movies."
0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jan, 2008 07:42 am
Re: private lives?
Walter Hinteler wrote:
flaja wrote:
Didn't Prussia start out as a very small geopolitical entity- essentially the Honhenzollern family farm?


Now it gets really funny.


You don't have sarcasm in Germany?

Quote:
Oh, and I certainly chose that first map and that period by the years flaja gave.


Your map reflects the area that had been annexed to Prussia up to around 1871. It far exceeds the original territory of Prussia. And since I was talking about Paul von Hindenburg, whose estate at Neudeck was located in West Prussia and the other Junker aristocracy, who would have similarly been situated within the original territory of Prussia, it should have been obvious to you that I was not talking about Prussia as it existed after 1871.
0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jan, 2008 07:47 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
flaja wrote:

Titanic was owned by an American company and thus was an American ship even though it was registered as a British ship for the purposes of international law. It was always assumed that the inside of Titanic reflected its British status. But this isn't true. The British call elevators "lifts", and it was always assumed that the elevators on Titanic were called lifts. However, one of James Cameron's expeditions to the wreck of Titanic found the 1st class elevators and they were marked elevators. Evidently White Star expected most of Titanic's 1st class passengers to be American and it used American, rather than British, terminology. In this regard Titanic was built to American design specifications.


And certainly that's why the Olympic and Britannic became British troop-transporters ...


Olympic became a British troop transport and Britannic became a hospital ship (I realize that you Germans cannot tell the difference since you sank Britannic with a mine) only because J. P. Morgan's son was an Anglophile and he allowed his company's property to be used by the British government during WWI.
0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jan, 2008 07:50 am
Re: private lives?
Walter Hinteler wrote:
It was mentioned here before already and thus I deleted my response re flaja's claims about "Prussia".

flaja wrote:

I wasn't talking about the geopolitical entity of Prussia, but rather the dirt of Prussia. And while Prussia may have the highest production of any Land (i.e., state) in the Federal Republic this is only because of its physical size. Prussia's soil is not very fertile. Acre for acre other Laender are more productive.


What you call "the dirt of Prussia" might have been what is known as "the Holy Empire of German Nation's box of sand" - the Brandenburg Marches have contemptuously been called so. That's not the historical Prussia but what was the 'heartland' of the later Prussia.


And thus was the main reason behind the Osthilfe Scandal. Since I was talking about Osthilfe, it should have been obvious that I was talking about Prussia's poor soil.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » private lives?
  3. » Page 2
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.67 seconds on 05/10/2025 at 09:23:08