1
   

biodiesel

 
 
flaja
 
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 07:35 pm
I just saw an episode of Mike Rowe's Dirty Jobs on the Discovery Challen. He was in Bellingham, Washington with a man that uses biodiesel in his 1982 Toyota King Cab pickup. This truck has 170,000+ miles on its original diesel engine.

The man collects waste vegetable oil from local restaurants that give it to him just to be rid of it.

The man spends $0.55 a gallon on the equipment, reagents and heat needed to process the waste oil into biodiesel.

The Toyota pickup gets 40 miles to the gallon.

So why have we allowed grocery prices to soar for the sake of turning corn into gasohol?

If the U.S. were to convert all waste vegetable oil to biodiesel, does anyone know how much of our fuel consumption the biodiesel would account for?

Does anyone know how much farmland would be needed to grow enough oil crops to meet the nation's auto fuel demands if vegetable oil (straight from the farm; not recycled from kitchens) were the only auto fuel we used?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,356 • Replies: 32
No top replies

 
Green Witch
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 08:01 pm
We've had a number of biodiesel threads, I seem to recall Farmerman having some good information about he topic.

I know of two people with grease cars, not biodiesel - straight veggie oil they pick up at local diners. Takes a person who likes to tinker to keep the cars running, but the owners seem to love them.

For the first time we are using a biodiesel mix in our home (oil) heating system. We joined a small co-op that makes the stuff, my husband didn't like the idea of making it in our basement. So far, so good. Cheaper than the stuff from Saudi Arabia and I just have to make a monthly run to collect waste oil as part of the co-op deal., You can read a little more about the general idea here:

Heating with Biodiesel

Corn is definitely NOT the way to go - it takes as much fuel to make the biodiesel as you get in the end. We already have a dead zone the size of New Jersey where the Mississippi meets the Gulf of Mexico from the run off pollution of the corn growers. Of course, Washington loves corn farmers and is ready to hand them big incentives. I think in the long run, if anything does happen, we will be plantings things like switch grass.

French fry grease is only a drop in the proverbial bucket and what is now free will probably soon be sold to the highest bidder if home biodiesel production continues to rise.

Lots of detailed info on the web if you poke around.
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 08:03 pm
Bookmark
0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 08:57 pm
Green Witch wrote:
I know of two people with grease cars, not biodiesel - straight veggie oil they pick up at local diners. Takes a person who likes to tinker to keep the cars running, but the owners seem to love them.


I know that you use vegetable oil straight off the farm in diesel engines. In fact the diesel engine was invented in 1900 and farmers used vegetable oil that they grew themselves since oil refineries didn't produce diesel fuel until the 1920s. But technically vegetable oil that isn't recycled isn't called biodiesel. I've also heard about people who use waste vegetable oil in diesel engines without processing it other than filtering out solid matter. I don't know what the benefits of treating the waste oil to make biodiesel are supposed to be. It may cause less wear and tear on your engine or something of that nature.

Quote:
For the first time we are using a biodiesel mix in our home (oil) heating system. We joined a small co-op that makes the stuff, my husband didn't like the idea of making it in our basement. So far, so good. Cheaper than the stuff from Saudi Arabia and I just have to make a monthly run to collect waste oil as part of the co-op deal., You can read a little more about the general idea here:


I've never heard anything about mixing biodiesel with another fuel. What kind of fuel oil are you using for heat? It may be something that people in the South won't recognize.

Quote:
Corn is definitely NOT the way to go - it takes as much fuel to make the biodiesel as you get in the end. We already have a dead zone the size of New Jersey where the Mississippi meets the Gulf of Mexico from the run off pollution of the corn growers.


If you don't use organic methods to grow the oil crops, would growing oil crops have the same effect on the environment as the corn does? I know that corn is fertilizer-intensive where soybeans can make a good portion of their own fertilizer by taking nitrogen out of the air, but industrial soybeans may be just as bad for the environment as industrial corn is.

Quote:
French fry grease is only a drop in the proverbial bucket and what is now free will probably soon be sold to the highest bidder if home biodiesel production continues to rise.


The last thing I want to see is the Exxons and Texacos of the world take over the biodiesel market. Biodiesel is the ideal diy, local self-reliance technology. Ending our dependence on big corporations would be the more important reason for using biodiesel; energy conservation would be secondary.
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 09:26 pm
Biodiesel is similar to ethanol as far as the quantity needed to replace other fuels. IOW, it would take about the same amount of corn to produce 20 gallons of ethanol as it would to produce 20 gallons of biodiesel.

But ethanol costs roughtly $1.75/gal to produce whereas biodiesel costs slightly more at $2.00/gal.

People are able to make biodiesel cheaper by using waste oils because it costs McDonald's something to dispose of their watse oil. They'd much rather give it away to someone that will take it off their hands than pay to dispose of it. But if the number of "home brew" producers went up they'd eventually start paying to get the waste oil so that $.55/gal that they mentioned on the show would increase.
0 Replies
 
Green Witch
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 09:30 pm
flaja wrote:

I've never heard anything about mixing biodiesel with another fuel. What kind of fuel oil are you using for heat? It may be something that people in the South won't recognize.


We've always used regular heating fuel oil, nothing special. You can't use 100% bio in a oil heat system without making some kind of adjustments, but a 50/50 mix is fine with a standard system. Sorry if I'm short on details, this is my husband's pet project.

flaja wrote:

If you don't use organic methods to grow the oil crops, would growing oil crops have the same effect on the environment as the corn does? I know that corn is fertilizer -intensive where soybeans can make a good portion of their own fertilizer by taking nitrogen out of the air, but industrial soybeans may be just as bad for the environment as industrial corn is.


Switch grass is grown without pesticides or fertilizer, it's a native prairie grass and many farmers are already growing it as fallow cover. Soybeans are not quite as bad as corn when it comes to artificial fertilizing, but they have become very disease prone due to over cropping, and thus are often grown with the use of fungicides. Corn is by far the worst, but I'm not sure if soy is much better.

flaja wrote:
The last thing I want to see is the Exxons and Texacos of the world take over the biodiesel market. Biodiesel is the ideal diy, local self-reliance technology. Ending our dependence on big corporations would be the more important reason for using biodiesel; energy conservation would be secondary.


I'm sure the established energy powers will find ways to control the alternatives to oil if they are given a chance. In fact, BP is looking into alternatives big time. It's why anyone associated with the corporate energy industry is pushing hydrogen instead of solar power, you can sell hydrogen at a station just like gas.

I don't think the technology is there for bio to replace fossil fuel, but it could help to buy the world some time. I wouldn't mind seeing the big oil corporations suffer, and I wouldn't mind the Middle East losing their cash cow either. The world would certainly be a more peaceful, cleaner place without their black gold.

If you want to see a really interesting documentary about big industry and alternatives, I suggest you rent "Who Killed The Electric Car" - GM now admits that crushing those cars was the biggest mistake they ever made. A sequel is in the works that explores what GM is doing today to get the electric car back on the road.

Sorry to ramble, it's getting late...
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 09:31 pm
Here is an interesting brochure on biodiesel

http://www.nrel.gov/vehiclesandfuels/npbf/pdfs/40555.pdf

found here
http://www.biodiesel.org/

Quote:
Raw or refined vegetable oil, or recycled greases that have not been processed into biodiesel, are not biodiesel and should be avoided. Research shows that vegetable oil or greases used in CI engines at levels as low as 10% to 20%, can cause long-term engine deposits, ring sticking, lube oil gelling, and other maintenance problems and can reduce engine life. These problems are caused mostly by the greater viscosity, or thickness, of the raw oils (around 40 mm2/s) compared to that of the diesel fuel for which the engines and injectors were designed (between 1.3 and 4.1 mm2/s). To avoid viscosity-related problems, vegetable oils and other feedstocks are converted into biodiesel. Through the process of converting vegetable oil or greases to biodiesel, we reduce viscosity of the fuel to values similar to conventional diesel fuel ( biodiesel values are typically between 4 and 5 mm2/s).
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 09:41 pm
flaja wrote:
Green Witch wrote:
I know of two people with grease cars, not biodiesel - straight veggie oil they pick up at local diners. Takes a person who likes to tinker to keep the cars running, but the owners seem to love them.


I know that you use vegetable oil straight off the farm in diesel engines. In fact the diesel engine was invented in 1900 and farmers used vegetable oil that they grew themselves since oil refineries didn't produce diesel fuel until the 1920s. But technically vegetable oil that isn't recycled isn't called biodiesel. I've also heard about people who use waste vegetable oil in diesel engines without processing it other than filtering out solid matter. I don't know what the benefits of treating the waste oil to make biodiesel are supposed to be. It may cause less wear and tear on your engine or something of that nature.


There are two basic processes for using veggie oil. The issue is that straight veggie oil (SVO) is to thick to use as it is. The 1st method is to take the oil, add methanol and lye and "cook" it to create Biodiesel. That can be burned in any diesel vehicle without any modifications to the vehicle. The 2nd method is to modify the vehicle with a SVO "kit" that heats the oil to thin it out so it can be burned.


Quote:
For the first time we are using a biodiesel mix in our home (oil) heating system. We joined a small co-op that makes the stuff, my husband didn't like the idea of making it in our basement. So far, so good. Cheaper than the stuff from Saudi Arabia and I just have to make a monthly run to collect waste oil as part of the co-op deal., You can read a little more about the general idea here:


I've never heard anything about mixing biodiesel with another fuel. What kind of fuel oil are you using for heat? It may be something that people in the South won't recognize.[/quote]

Biodiesel comes in sveral "flavors" . Straight biodiesl is known as "B100" (or 100% biodiesel). It can also be mixed 20/80 with regular diesel fuel and is called "B20" (20% Biodiesel) or "B80" which is 80% biodiesel. It can also be mixed with #2 heating oil for use in oil burning furnaces.


Quote:
French fry grease is only a drop in the proverbial bucket and what is now free will probably soon be sold to the highest bidder if home biodiesel production continues to rise.


The last thing I want to see is the Exxons and Texacos of the world take over the biodiesel market. Biodiesel is the ideal diy, local self-reliance technology. Ending our dependence on big corporations would be the more important reason for using biodiesel; energy conservation would be secondary.[/quote]

I'd disagree with this. Most people aren't going to cook their own biodiesel. To make it viable it has to be mass produced and available at stations just as gasoline is now. There will be no mass acceptance of it if the vehicle owner has to run home to refill their tank. Billy-Bob isn't going to buy into biodiesel if he can't take his family on the annual trip from NJ to FL to visit Disneyland and he sure isn't going to tow a fuel tanker with a few hundred gallons of home brewed biodiesel behind him. If people want to make their own no on eis going to stop them. But it will never be a mass market item if that's the only way to obtain it either.
0 Replies
 
Green Witch
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 10:05 pm
fishin wrote:


Quote:
The last thing I want to see is the Exxons and Texacos of the world take over the biodiesel market. Biodiesel is the ideal diy, local self-reliance technology. Ending our dependence on big corporations would be the more important reason for using biodiesel; energy conservation would be secondary.


I'd disagree with this. Most people aren't going to cook their own biodiesel. To make it viable it has to be mass produced and available at stations just as gasoline is now. There will be no mass acceptance of it if the vehicle owner has to run home to refill their tank. Billy-Bob isn't going to buy into biodiesel if he can't take his family on the annual trip from NJ to FL to visit Disneyland and he sure isn't going to tow a fuel tanker with a few hundred gallons of home brewed biodiesel behind him. If people want to make their own no on eis going to stop them. But it will never be a mass market item if that's the only way to obtain it either.


Can't argue with that - we do need a creation and distribution system. My husband and I decided not to mix our own bio because it's not a completely stable process, and accidents can happen. The fuel is volatile if not handled properly.

However, instead of the Corporate Energy Weasels controlling the show, I wish a small alternative energy system could be created. It would consist of a local energy company making and distributing the fuel. Maybe local farmers could grow the plant material. A family could own a gas (biodiesel) station just as they do now, only they would be buying the fuel from a local source instead of Exxon/Mobile/Sunoco etc. Such a system could be established all over the US - thus BillyBob could drive his family from Trailerville, Arkansas to East Jesus, Nebraska without worrying about running out of fuel.
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 10:25 pm
Green Witch wrote:
fishin wrote:


Quote:
The last thing I want to see is the Exxons and Texacos of the world take over the biodiesel market. Biodiesel is the ideal diy, local self-reliance technology. Ending our dependence on big corporations would be the more important reason for using biodiesel; energy conservation would be secondary.


I'd disagree with this. Most people aren't going to cook their own biodiesel. To make it viable it has to be mass produced and available at stations just as gasoline is now. There will be no mass acceptance of it if the vehicle owner has to run home to refill their tank. Billy-Bob isn't going to buy into biodiesel if he can't take his family on the annual trip from NJ to FL to visit Disneyland and he sure isn't going to tow a fuel tanker with a few hundred gallons of home brewed biodiesel behind him. If people want to make their own no on eis going to stop them. But it will never be a mass market item if that's the only way to obtain it either.


Can't argue with that - we do need a creation and distribution system. My husband and I decided not to mix our own bio because it's not a completely stable process, and accidents can happen. The fuel is volatile if not handled properly.

However, instead of the Corporate Energy Weasels controlling the show, I wish a small alternative energy system could be created. It would consist of a local energy company making and distributing the fuel. Maybe local farmers could grow the plant material. A family could own a gas (biodiesel) station just as they do now, only they would be buying the fuel from a local source instead of Exxon/Mobile/Sunoco etc. Such a system could be established all over the US - thus BillyBob could drive his family from Trailerville, Arkansas to East Jesus, Nebraska without worrying about running out of fuel.


I'd agree that such a system would be nice (and it already exists to some extent) but I don't see it as viable. There are probably adequate places to grow crops and store huge amounts of veggie oil around Dayton, OH or Topeka, Kansas to carry them through the year. The same isn't true for places like Boston, New York, Miami or Los Angeles.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 07:01 am
flaja wrote:

I know that you use vegetable oil straight off the farm in diesel engines. In fact the diesel engine was invented in 1900 and farmers used vegetable oil ....


You must mean a different engine than that invented by Rudolf Diesel.
0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 07:30 am
fishin wrote:
Biodiesel is similar to ethanol as far as the quantity needed to replace other fuels. IOW, it would take about the same amount of corn to produce 20 gallons of ethanol as it would to produce 20 gallons of biodiesel.


I don't know why anyone would use corn oil as a diesel fuel. Corn oil is too valuable for other uses and thus would be too expensive to put into diesel engines.

I don't know anything about the relative oil per acre production rates for various oil crops. Can you shed any light on this? According to the episode of Dirty Jobs mustard seed oil is the most chemically similar to petro-diesel fuel of all of the vegetable oils.

Quote:
But ethanol costs roughtly $1.75/gal to produce whereas biodiesel costs slightly more at $2.00/gal.


You cannot use ethanol in a diesel engine and you cannot use any form of diesel in any engine that can use ethanol without essentially rebuilding that engine. You are comparing apples to oranges.

If biodiesel gets 40 miles to the gallon, what does ethanol get?

Also what is the net energy value of ethanol made from corn? Everything that I have ever heard about corn-based ethanol says that the energy in the ethanol is less than the energy needed to turn corn into alcohol. Turning corn into ethanol means a net energy loss.

And like I said before it takes more fertilizer to grow corn than it does to grow soybeans. So if everything else is equal soybeans are cheaper than corn.
0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 07:36 am
Corn has a very narrow set of ideal growing conditions. It is profitable to grow only in certain areas. Therefore we cannot grow corn for ethanol without diverting corn from our food supply (namely animal feed). But if we diverted our existing soybean crop to vegetable oil diesel we would be doing the same thing with our food supply. But do we have land that is not now in agricultural production that could be used to grow soybeans or some other vegetable oil crop so we can grow fuel without altering our food supply?
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 07:49 am
Conoco has teamed up with Tyson Foods to capture their fat from chicken processing for bio.

Whether you want the major oil companies to remain the central suppliers or not.....that is likely how it will turn out because they have the infrastructure and distribution to do it best.

The thing is...there is no real market demand for biodiesel or ethanol gas that isn't politically driven....so it could disappear as fast as it did in the early 90's.
0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 08:01 am
fishin wrote:
I'd disagree with this. Most people aren't going to cook their own biodiesel. To make it viable it has to be mass produced and available at stations just as gasoline is now.


Why not let it be made by locally-owned companies or non-profit co-ops? Just because you cannot or will not do something for yourself doesn't mean that you automatically have to have a big corporation do it for you.

Quote:
There will be no mass acceptance of it if the vehicle owner has to run home to refill their tank.


Let's see: 40 miles to the gallon with a 10 gallon tank means you can travel 400 miles between fill-ups. Home will do for most people.

Quote:
Billy-Bob isn't going to buy into biodiesel if he can't take his family on the annual trip from NJ to FL to visit Disneyland and he sure isn't going to tow a fuel tanker with a few hundred gallons of home brewed biodiesel behind him.


Billy-Bob is going to drive back and forth to work 1000 times a year just to make 1 trip to Disneyworld (Disneyland is in California, not Florida). It wouldn't be hard for him to make biodiesel for his everyday needs or buy it from local producers.

Quote:
If people want to make their own no on eis going to stop them. But it will never be a mass market item if that's the only way to obtain it either.


Corporations must love you. Why does biodiesel need to be a mass market item? The only mass market thing needed for biodiesel is growing the crop and taking the oil out of it. And even this could be done on a localized basis for some parts of the country through community supported agriculture.
0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 08:13 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
flaja wrote:

I know that you use vegetable oil straight off the farm in diesel engines. In fact the diesel engine was invented in 1900 and farmers used vegetable oil ....


You must mean a different engine than that invented by Rudolf Diesel.


My understanding is that Rudolf Diesel ran his engine on peanut oil. His goal was to build an engine that farmers could fuel themselves with the crops they could grow.
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 08:54 am
flaja wrote:
fishin wrote:
Biodiesel is similar to ethanol as far as the quantity needed to replace other fuels. IOW, it would take about the same amount of corn to produce 20 gallons of ethanol as it would to produce 20 gallons of biodiesel.


I don't know why anyone would use corn oil as a diesel fuel. Corn oil is too valuable for other uses and thus would be too expensive to put into diesel engines.

I don't know anything about the relative oil per acre production rates for various oil crops. Can you shed any light on this? According to the episode of Dirty Jobs mustard seed oil is the most chemically similar to petro-diesel fuel of all of the vegetable oils.


There is a table listed here that goes through various crops and lists the typical production on a per acre basis.


Quote:
But ethanol costs roughtly $1.75/gal to produce whereas biodiesel costs slightly more at $2.00/gal.


You cannot use ethanol in a diesel engine and you cannot use any form of diesel in any engine that can use ethanol without essentially rebuilding that engine. You are comparing apples to oranges.[/quote]

I am fully aware of that. And it isn't an apples/oranges comparison. It is a recognition of the fact that 90% of the vehicles currently on the road burn gasoline. Those vehicles will never be converted to biodiesel so you will never convince their owners to invest in biofuels if you don't provide some benefit to them directly. You can generate all the biodiesel in the world but if someone owns a gasoline vehicle and burns natural gas to heat their home they won't use a drop of it. The ratio of diesel/gasoline cars many change in the future but it isn't going to happen in any significant amount any time soon.

Quote:
If biodiesel gets 40 miles to the gallon, what does ethanol get?


Biodiesel doesn't "get" anything. The mpg obtained is by the vehicle. The VW Jetta diesel conversions typically get 50mpg. A Ford F-350 gets 18-20 and a typical tractor trailer truck gets ~3-4 mpg All of them can (and have) run on biodiesel. So MPG is a poor measure of comparison.

Quote:
Also what is the net energy value of ethanol made from corn? Everything that I have ever heard about corn-based ethanol says that the energy in the ethanol is less than the energy needed to turn corn into alcohol. Turning corn into ethanol means a net energy loss.


Biodiesel (B100) contains ~130000 btu's of energy/gallon
Ethanol contains ~78,000 but/gallon.

Both require more energy to produce than they create. The net loss in a corn -> ethanol conversion is ~29%. The net loss in soy -> biodiesel conversion is ~27%.

There is NO energy currently known where there is no net loss in conversion to a useable form. If such a source of energy had been found we'd all be using it and no one would be paying anything for any energy.
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 09:19 am
flaja wrote:
fishin wrote:
I'd disagree with this. Most people aren't going to cook their own biodiesel. To make it viable it has to be mass produced and available at stations just as gasoline is now.


Why not let it be made by locally-owned companies or non-profit co-ops? Just because you cannot or will not do something for yourself doesn't mean that you automatically have to have a big corporation do it for you.


Because the majority of places where the fuel is used don't have any local sources for the crops.

Quote:
Quote:
There will be no mass acceptance of it if the vehicle owner has to run home to refill their tank.


Let's see: 40 miles to the gallon with a 10 gallon tank means you can travel 400 miles between fill-ups. Home will do for most people.


Apparently not. The difference in mileage between gasoline and normal diesel fuel hasn't prompted many to pay the additional cost for a diesel car as it is. Getting 400 miles from home nad then having to pay to have your vehicle towed back home so you can refill it doesn't appeal to many.

Quote:
Billy-Bob isn't going to buy into biodiesel if he can't take his family on the annual trip from NJ to FL to visit Disneyland and he sure isn't going to tow a fuel tanker with a few hundred gallons of home brewed biodiesel behind him.


Billy-Bob is going to drive back and forth to work 1000 times a year just to make 1 trip to Disneyworld (Disneyland is in California, not Florida). It wouldn't be hard for him to make biodiesel for his everyday needs or buy it from local producers.

Quote:
Quote:
If people want to make their own no one is going to stop them. But it will never be a mass market item if that's the only way to obtain it either.


Corporations must love you. Why does biodiesel need to be a mass market item? The only mass market thing needed for biodiesel is growing the crop and taking the oil out of it. And even this could be done on a localized basis for some parts of the country through community supported agriculture.


There is no doubt that it is possible for "some parts" of the country. I doubt it can be done for large parts of the country though. And those large parts are the parts that use most of the energy. What effect does the economy of scale have when you have to truck the raw materials to those areas where the crops can't be grown locally vs. trucking the finished product?

While you claim that "The only mass market thing needed for biodiesel is growing the crop and taking the oil out of it." there is a bit more to it than that. Biodiesel conversion plants (even small ones) are refineries. Each and every one of them would require EPA approval to open and operate just as current diesel refineries require permits. Thusfar the EPA has looked the other way with the mom and pop filks brewing thier own in their garage but that's because there are so few of them. If it takes off on a large scale you can bet that the EPA is going to come up with a permitting process. The first time some yokle leaks a few hundred gallons oif biodiesel from their garage into the local ground water the home brewer's will stop.

And I doubt that people are just going to roll over and accept biodiesel refineries in thier neighborhoods any more than they accept gas/diesel refineries now. (We can't even get people to accept wind energy systems that don't produce any toxins at all...)

Mass market adoption is required for practical reasons - not for technical ones.
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 10:50 am
Quote:
We can't even get people to accept wind energy systems that don't produce any toxins at all...


true , unfortunately !
we have two sparsely populated islands at the eastern end of lake ontario , very good conditions for producing wind power . the few inhabitants are fighting tooth and nail because it MIGHT spoil the pristine landscape - but they are also fighting to keep their heavily subsidizd car-ferries that are using diesel fuel !!!
the turbines would actually be quite a distance away from any island dwellings .
hbg
0 Replies
 
flaja
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 10:58 am
fishin wrote:
There is a table listed here that goes through various crops and lists the typical production on a per acre basis.


Other questions must also be considered:

1. Which of these crops produce oil that is suitable for diesel fuel?

2. Which of the crops from #1 are too valuable as food or other-non fuel uses to be used as fuel?

3. Of the crops that are suitable as fuel crops which ones have the lowest productions costs in terms of money and thus would make an economically viable fuel source?

4. Of the crops that are suitable as fuel crops which ones have the lowest environmental impacts and thus make an ecologically viable fuel source?

5. Do all of the viable oil crops produce fuels that have the same efficiency?

Quote:
I am fully aware of that. And it isn't an apples/oranges comparison. It is a recognition of the fact that 90% of the vehicles currently on the road burn gasoline.


What has this to do with the relative fuel, economic and environmental values of ethanol and biodiesel?

Quote:
Those vehicles will never be converted to biodiesel so you will never convince their owners to invest in biofuels if you don't provide some benefit to them directly.


If the economy were to go south, gasoline prices would be incentive enough. Just witness what happened to gas-guzzling cars in the 1970s.

But if 90% of the vehicles on the road now cannot use diesel/biodiesel, what makes you think the big oil companies, that are making huge profits with gas, would ever bother to invest in biofuel technology?

Quote:
You can generate all the biodiesel in the world but if someone owns a gasoline vehicle and burns natural gas to heat their home they won't use a drop of it. The ratio of diesel/gasoline cars many change in the future but it isn't going to happen in any significant amount any time soon.


I've never said otherwise.

Quote:
Biodiesel doesn't "get" anything. The mpg obtained is by the vehicle. The VW Jetta diesel conversions typically get 50mpg. A Ford F-350 gets 18-20 and a typical tractor trailer truck gets ~3-4 mpg All of them can (and have) run on biodiesel. So MPG is a poor measure of comparison.


No it is not. If biodiesel costs $x a gallon to make and you can get y miles to the gallon while ethanol costs $a a gallon to make and you can get b miles to the gallon, which fuel is more cost effective?

Quote:
Both require more energy to produce than they create. The net loss in a corn -> ethanol conversion is ~29%. The net loss in soy -> biodiesel conversion is ~27%.


Are you counting the energy needed to grow the crops or just the energy needed to turn the finished crop into fuel? It know that it takes a good deal of heat to make corn warm enough for it to ferment into alcohol and then to remove the alcohol from the water via distillation. However, according to the episode of Dirty Jobs you only have to heat the biodiesel reagents to 130 degrees Fahrenheit. I would assume that such modest heating could be accomplished with solar energy.

Quote:
There is NO energy currently known where there is no net loss in conversion to a useable form.


I didn't assume there was considering the law of conservation of energy.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » biodiesel
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 08:30:05