0
   

The American Civil War in 4 Minutes

 
 
tycoon
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Jan, 2008 08:51 am
farmerman wrote:
tycoon. Forrest was 2 days behind his BG who was sent in to Fort Pillow to initiate its capture. When Forrest arrived (as was his philosophy of "get there first with the most and never let the enemy dfine the battle"). Forrest took command. There were guns at the fort and a swivel turret gunboat "The NEw Era" , so 1/4 mile isnt bad. He tried to keep his men out of gun range until the commander of the fort refused surrender. I pretty much agree with sets facts , the original work by CAstleton had the same take on Fort Pillow.


Thanks for the nuggets, FM. I appreciate all I can get about this particular facet of the War, though yours digested a little hard. It's just...what was he doing attacking Fort Pillow in the first place? Watching this 4 minute vignette clearly shows the fort to be of no crucial importance as far as military position goes. My impression is that this fort contained a lot of local blacks who needed to be taught a hard lesson. The number of dead black soldiers to white in the fort bears this impression out a bit.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Jan, 2008 08:56 am
Setanta wrote:
You left out Lieutenant General Nathan Bedford Forrest (it was apparently become easy to get a commission as Lieutenant General in the late stages of the war), who surrendered at Gainesville, Alabama on May 9, 1865. As well as Forrest, you left out Sterling Price, who lead the ghost of the Missouri State Guard to Mexico after the war, refusing to surrender. There was briefly a Confederate colony at Vera Cruz, but the survivors filtered back to the United States when they learned to a certainty that a general amnesty was in effect. Price himself returned, and died at St. Louis in 1867.

Like i said, the war was over when Johnston surrendered. The rest was just rounding up the strays.


isn't that who Forrest gump was named after?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Jan, 2008 09:08 am
Obviously, referring to the opening of the Seven Days Battles as "suicidal" is tendentious. However, i think that this first great operational effort on Lee's part shows all of his flaws--glaringly.

Stuart's "Ride Around McClellan" (it was so celebrated from the very beginning) was a case of Lee having failed to adequately impress upon a subordinate what his orders were, and how they were expected to have been carried out. It was not simply in the character of the orders, which are sufficiently ambiguous, but that Lee did not take the opportunity to impress upon Stuart what was expected of him, and to deny to him his plan of a glorious exploit when Stuart first proposed it to Lee, when they discussed the mission face-to-face. And nothing was said to Stuart upon his return about the three-ring circus which he had made of a crucially important reconnaissance. In fact, as the commander of the cavalry for the army, a good argument could be made that Stuart had no business to have lead the reconnaissance, or to have been absent from his command for several days. One might reasonably suggest that this would loom larger a year later, when Stuart "went missing" on the eve of the battle of Gettysburg.

Lee had the character of a loving and forgiving father (which he was in reality with his own family, whom he loved and who loved him deeply and genuinely), and not at all the character of a stern disciplinarian. His courtly manners, although he could and often was silent and reserved, tended to quickly convince people that he was "accessible," and kindly. Wherever he established his headquarters, civilians not only felt the could "come to call," but began to consider it their right. At Orange Court House, two matrons of the community called upon him, to complain that young ladies had "consorted" with the enemy by attending evening entertainments (grandiloquently referred to as balls) when the Federal forces had occupied the area. Lee replied that he thought it a good thing that the young ladies should find harmless entertainment in that manner, and then commented to the effect that he knew Major Sedgwick, and knew that he would have no one but gentlemen around him. I do not suggest that he ought to have adopted a severe attitude toward young ladies who wished to dance, even though with Federal officers--i do question why such things were so routinely brought to the attention of the man who commanded the Confederacy's largest army; this is something else which a competent staff does, they shield the commander from needless distractions.

(Another interesting, and perhaps significant matter arises here. Lee referred to Major General John Sedgewick as "Major Sedgwick," and this was not an isolated incident, either. During the battle of Chancellorsville, a chaplain rode into the clearing where Lee's "headquarters" [such as it was, and it was never much] was located, and almost breathlessly informed him that the Federals were pressing upon Jubal Early's line dangerously [Early was at Fredericksburg holding off the threat to Lee's rear]. Lee offered the good chaplain a glass of buttermilk, bad him sit down, and then commented that he was just sending Major General McLaws to call upon Major Sedgwick [Lafayette McLaws, was a division commander in the first corps of Lee's army; and this was the same Major General Sedgwick referred to above]. Note the punctilio with which he assures that he refers to McLaws by his correct rank, but refers to Sedgwick as "Major." Lee routinely referred to Federal officers--when he could bring himself to speak of the at all, he usually just said "those people," or "those people over there"--by their pre-war rank, by their rank in "the Old Army." Even more revealing is this:

http://www.historyplace.com/civilwar/cwar-pix/lee-1.jpg

Note the rank insignia on Lee's uniform coat. He wears three stars--this is the rank insignia in Confederate service of a Colonel, which is the highest rank which Lee attained in the "Old Army" before he resigned. That, combined with frequent references to Federal officers whom he had known personally before the war by their pre-war rank is, to put it charitably, a little odd. During the Battle of the Wilderness, at the opening of the 1864 campaign, it appears that Lee might have briefly contemplated "suicide by combat" when he attempted to ride to the front at the head of the Texas brigade, at which time NCOs of the brigade were obliged to physically restrain him, amid anguished cries of "Lee to the rear!" I can't say it for a fact, but i am personally convinced that the war at least slightly unhinged him. He had spent 36 years in "the Old Army" when he resigned his commission, and he was a genuinely modest and unassuming man who never gloried in the slaughter and strife of war. It is reported by several witnesses that at the bloody slaughter of Federal troops at Fredericksburg in December, 1862, he said: "It is well that war is so terrible, lest we grow too fond of it." This is, of course, purely speculation, and Lee was a sufficiently "close" man, that we know little for a fact about how he felt about the war, and about his role in it.)

The opening of the Seven Days shows again that the greatest flaw as a commander of a large formation was Lee's failure to discipline his higher ranking officers properly. Jackson was arrived with his Valley Army, much later than had been planned (which is not a criticism of Jackson, who had performed a wonder of military organization and logistics to have brought his army so far, intact and ready to fight, in such a brief period of time). The plan called for him to attack Porter on his right flank and rear (to the north and east), triggering a series of echelon attacks as Jackson's advance cleared the bridges over the Chickahominy. Tired of waiting for the sound of Jackson's guns, Alvin Powell "Little Powell" Hill launched an attack on Porter which drew in Longstreet and Daniel Harvey Hill, in what became known as the Battle of Mechanicsville (where Hill crossed the river), or Beaver Dam Creek, where Confederate troops suffered a terrible slaughter to little tactical purpose. This was, however, an event which deepened McClellan's panic. He already believed Pinkerton's claptrap about 200,000 Confederate troops in Richmond, and the arrival of two "demi-divisions" to the south of the Richmond defenses convinced him that he was facing even more troops. His only response was to send more and more urgent orders to Porter to withdraw. Porter was already doing this, and he had already sent off his trains, after issuing ammunition and rations to his troops. His trains crossed the Grapevine Bridge at White Oak Swamp the same evening, and Porter began his withdrawal. He conducted a brilliant defense, and there is nothing harder in military operations than to conduct a fighting retreat while keeping your troops in hand and preventing a route. Attacked at Beaver Dam Creek and Boatswain's Swamp, Porter sent troops to his right, where he had not (yet) been attacked, correctly surmising that the intended plan called for an attack on his flank and rear.

But that attack never came. Jackson was to have made contact with W. H. C. Whiting's "demi-division," which was to have marched southeast, keeping it's right flank on the Chickahominy River. Jackson was to have conformed, and so arrived in large force (nearly as large as Porter's "Grand Division") on Porter's flank. As has been noted, Porter was not unprepared for such an eventuality.

Johnston had organized his army into demi-divisions, each of two brigades. When the Army of Northern Virginia was reorganized after the Seven Days, there were three divisions of five brigades, five divisions of four brigades, and Little Powell Hill's monster division of six brigades, the so-called Light Division. At the time of this first campaign of Lee, the Confederate command was "top-heavy," with a herd of general officers commanding small formations, and indulging in petty infighting due to their respective vanities. Lee was to greatly reduce the list of Major Generals with command responsibilities in his army, and to gradual weed out those he found lacking. After the Battle of Sharpsburg, or Antietam, offices to command divisions and Corps were found within the army, and their places were filled by promotions of serving officers who had distinguished themselves in the army. This is a reasonable policy, and might have been more efficient, if Lee had been able to handle his general officers more effectively.

Jackson did not make contact with Whiting, however, and despite the sound of furious battle, when he reached (as he thought) the position to which he had been ordered for the first day, he sent his troops into bivouac. Lee said nothing to Jackson, to Whiting or to Little Powell Hill about this after the campaign. He and his army and his lieutenants were wildly lionized by the Southern press and public after this campaign, so one might tend to excuse this--but Lee was ruthless about getting rid of "dead wood," and officers such as Magruder, Whiting and Huger were left out of the reorganization; nevertheless, he made no criticisms public or private of the actions or inaction of those who had "failed" him, but whom he intended to keep in service in his army. In the case of Magruder, this was injustice--Magruder, with a demi-division of a few thousand men, repeated his performance before Williamsburg, and marched them around rattling his sabre, and completely fooled McClellan about the defenses of Richmond, confirming what McClellan wanted to believe, that he was badly outnumbered. Magruder's major sin was that he could not be the friend of James Longstreet, which doomed any hope of a career in Lee's army. Lee may have found dealing with personalities distasteful, but he was not above playing the games himself.

It is not my intention to give detailed accounts of battles. It is my intention to ask why, and to provide my opinion on why, the battles fell out as they did. Jackson has been criticized, with a certain amount of justification, for being slow. In his defense, it can be pointed out that he had no maps, none of his staff was familiar with the region, Lee sent no staff officers to him, and his army had been campaigning and fighting from February of that year, four times traversing the length of the Shenandoah Valley, fighting in five major battles, and numerous small engagements, after which they marched from the Valley to Richmond, and were sent to fight five more battles. On the morning of the second day, a trooper who was familiar with the region was sent to Jackson by Stuart (both devout Christians and fierce fighters--a not incompatible circumstance--they were to become immediate and fast friends). One has to ask why it was that the commander of the army's cavalry was taking such an action on his own initiative, when the commander of the army ought to have provided maps, guides and staff officers to Jackson, whose role was crucial, and whose force, when combined with Whiting, represented about 40% of Lee's army. One has to ask why Lee did nothing to restrain Little Powell Hill when he attacked without orders, in contradiction of his orders, on the first day, and drew about 20% of the army into a futile and bloody battle. Not only did Hill not suffer the implied rebuke which Magruder, Huger and Whiting suffered in the army's reorganization, he was given the largest division in the army when it was reformed. Lee's failure to provide the most basic of staff services continued throughout the battles of the Seven Days. The trooper whom Stuart had sent to Jackson had been told that he was to lead Jackson to Cold Harbor. He did so, and Jackson, almost in a fury, asked him why the enemy was not there, when he had been told that he would find Porter at New Cold Harbor. The trooper lost his own temper (an incredible thing to do when dealing with Jackson), and pointed out that he had lead him to Cold Harbor, and no one had told him to lead him to New Cold Harbor. (There were two Cold Harbors--Cold Harbor, also known as Old Cold Harbor, and New Cold Harbor.) Jackson's march had been delayed on the first day because he had tried to find Spring Green Church--and apparently, Lee was himself unaware that Spring Green Church was miles from Porter's position. That Jackson was receiving his instructions from Stuart, by way of a single enlisted man sent on Stuart's own initiative is a very bad comment on Lee's conception of staff work. What is even more problematic is that Lee had made his name in the Old Army, and learned the trade of battle by serving as Winfield Scott's chief of engineers in the march from Vera Cruz to Mexico City. It is not just inexcusable that Lee's staff work was poor, his staff work was non-existant.

Had Jackson come up as expected, and had Hill waiting for Jackson to engage before attacking, the slaughter would have been bad enough--Porter's men were dug in behind field fortifications behind creeks and swamps. As it was, Hill's attack cost many irreplaceable lives with the dubious result that McClellan panicked even more than he previously had. McClellan needed no encouragement to imagine monsters in the dark waiting to pounce on him. And the South badly needed the men thrown away not once, but three times in the campaign because the Confederate attacks were uncoordinated. It is true that Jackson was late, but i've pointed out that this could not really be helped. That he wandered around for four days, doing little of value to Lee's army, other than further spooking a badly spooked opponent speaks volumes about Lee's failure to do basic staff work. Lee's plan was to "bag" Porter. Had he delayed even another day, Porter would probably have been marching away before an attack was launched. It could be argued that Lee was justified in attempting to destroy Porter while he still had the chance, but Lee was unaware of Porter's orders or of McClellan's panic. And the lives lost in fighting to make Porter do what he was already ordered to do were too high a price to pay. Which brings us to my final criticism of Lee as an army commander.

Lee was profligate of the lives of his men. He did nothing to interfere with Hill's unauthorized and unwise attack on June 26. This despite having said before witnesses that he was surprised to hear Hill's guns, and wondering what Hill thought he was doing. A Prussian observer who was assigned to Lee's army asked him a few months later what his method was. Lee replied that he brought his officers and troops to the place at which he wished to fight the enemy, and then he considered that he had done the whole of his duty. He said, in effect, that at that point, it was in God's hands. Lee was long supported by competent, and even brilliant lieutenants, but he often failed so often to meet even the low standard which he described to the young Prussian officer. The Seven Days was planned by the principle officers discussing Lee's plan on the evening of June 23, and that, apparently, assured Lee that he had done "the whole of [his] duty." It was to cost his army many lives which the Confederacy could ill afford.

The final debacle of the Seven Days the "battle" of Malvern Hill. Lee's plan had been to bag and destroy Porter. But there Porter was, on that low hill, with the survivors of his "grand division," Supported by more than 100 canon and more than half of McClellan's army. One futile attack after another was launched. Almost every Confederate gun battery which attempted to unlimber and fire was swept away by the concentrated Federal artillery before they could fire a shot. Those which managed to unlimber unheeded were destroyed within minutes of opening fire. Daniel Harvey Hill commented after the battle: "It wasn't war, it was murder." Lee can, in the most charitable construction, be said to have had too great a faith in the invincibility of his infantry. Tragically, those troops returned that confidence by a devotion which approached the suicidal.

Therefore, my criticism of Lee is that he was not effective in managing and disciplining his higher ranking lieutenants; that his staff work was not poor, it was not done at all; and that he would spend the lives of his men heedlessly, and quixotically, they loved him for it. I don't wish here to apply these criticisms to a discussion of his subsequent career, although i am prepared to do so. My next victim will be Grant, who comes off a little better.

The most i can say in Lee's defense is that the South expected it's heroes to stand on the defensive, but to attack savagely whenever the enemy invaded Southern territory--and one might say that Lee understood this better than any other man, except perhaps Joe Johnston, who refused to play the game. Johnston's biggest failing was that he saw how futile it all was, and rather than attacking, stood on the defense and punished the enemy bitterly for his attacks. That would not wash with the Southern public, and especially with Jefferson Davis, himself a graduate of the USMA, and a distinguished veteran of the Mexican War. Lee seems to have been the only other soldier whom Davis genuinely respected, and to whom he was willing to defer. Lee became a hero of the South as much because of his image as a bold and fearless cavalier (over the corpses of the Army of Northern Virginia) as for any technical skills, about which most people know little to nothing when witnessing a war from afar.

Lee's greatest strength was that in campaigning he was decisive and stood not upon the order of their going. Just before the battle of Cold Harbor in 1864 (right back where they started), Grant rode into the front yard of a justice of the peace east of Richmond. That man, being the gentleman he likely claimed to be, offered them such refreshment as was available to him, but was ignored by Grant. He reported that Grant took out his watch and commented to his staff: "If i don't hear the old fox's guns in fifteen minutes, i've got him." Five minutes later, the cannons began to roar at Old Cold Harbor. The Old Fox (as Grant habitually named him), had stolen another march on the Yankees.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Jan, 2008 09:15 am
farmerman wrote:
As far as the KKK, Forrest may have been more a victim of bad press.


It is worth pointing out at this time that after Forrest disbanded the KKK in 1870, and Grant's Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1871, also known as the Ku Klux Klan Act, although night riders continued to operate, the organization was dead. It was resurrected in Georgia in 1915 by a failed Protestant minister at the time that The Birth of Nation was the most popular film in America, based on the then very popular novel The Clansman, and in particular at the time of the trial and lynching of Leo Frank, who was accused of the murder of an adolescent girl. Frank was Jewish. Anyone interested in the distinction between the first Klan and the modern Klan should do a search for William Joseph Simmons, who resurrected the Klan.

As for the incident at Fort Pillow, which i don't consider to have actually been a massacre, perhaps i'll comment on that after i've smeared Grant, if i have the time and the inclination.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Jan, 2008 10:00 am
For an excellent "worm's eye view" of the war, i recommend a paperback which was published a few years ago, Ambrose Bierce's Civil War. It is based on his writings about the war, including his novella length memoir What I Saw at Shiloh. He also wrote three short stories based on his war experiences, "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge", "Killed at Resaca", and "Chickamauga". At Chickamauga, when the division in which he was a staff officer broke and ran, he joined Thomas in his horseshoe formation which held out while the rest of the army escaped to Chattanooga. He tells of how, at sunset, the "rebel yell" was begun at one end of their line, and taken up along the Confederate line, until it had been repeated along the formation, but that there still remained a small space to the rear of Thomas' position where the cry was not taken up.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Jan, 2008 05:11 pm
Ulysses Grant.

Grant is rather easier to deal with, because there is nothing in his career in the Civil War which is inexplicable, and there is little reason to speculate on his behavior and motives. This is reinforced by the fact that, unlike Lee, he did write his memoirs. As will always be the case with autobiography, there is a good deal which is left out. It is nevertheless candid and invaluable. I have often thought of Grant's memoirs when thinking about how unable we all are to see ourselves as others see us. Grant was able--most of the time--to admit his mistakes. He commented that the final assault at Vicksburg was needless bloodshed. In the same passage, he states that the final assault at Cold Harbor (1864) was a mistake, writing: "At Cold Harbor no advantage whatever was gained to compensate for the heavy loss we sustained." This qualifies as a gross understatement, especially in light of his message to Washington City that "our losses were not severe"--he tells a more truthful tale in his memoirs. The heavy loss to which he refers was the largest loss of life in the shortest period of time by Americans in an infantry action in our history. Some historians claim that 7000 Federal troops were shot down in less than 30 minutes--with many pointing out that the assault failed within the first ten minutes. In this, however, Grant was no different than any other military man writing his memoirs, and he is often a good deal more candid that is usually the case with such autobiographies.

Grant was pre-eminently qualified to hold the position of commander of all the armies. He was competent to command an, barely, if his subordinates were reliable. He was not competent to command any formation between a regiment and an army, and was still in need of reliable subordinates to accomplish either command effectively. Of course, no one knew this when the war began, including Grant. His career demonstrates that his oddest and most inexplicable characteristic was how quickly he apparently became bored with command and combat.

When Texas entered the Union, President Polk was prepared for war with Mexico, and many historians and biographers justifiably allege that he sought war. The Mexicans claimed that Texas ended at the Brazos River, and the Texicans (as they were then known) claimed the Rio Grande was the boundary. Therefore, the land between those rivers was disputed, and both nations claimed that they were waging defensive war, because their territory had been invaded by the other. The Mexican claim is somewhat better than our own. Although they claimed the land between the Rio Grande and the Brazos, they did not garrison or even patrol it, entering the disputed territory only to drive out Texas forces when they appeared. Polk sent Zachary Taylor with an elite force of American professional troops into the disputed land, with order to march to the Rio Grande, and to establish a post (which is modern-day Brownsville, Texas, named after Major Brown who was killed defending his post in Taylor's absence).

Grant went along as a newly-minted infantry officer in the 4th Infantry. Two battles were fought after Taylor left Major Brown in their little field fortress so that he (Taylor) could escort their supply train to the new post. These were the battles of Resaca de la Palma and Palo Alto. I do not now recall which battle it was, although i think it was Palo Alto, during which Grant describes himself wandering around, and losing touch with his regiment. This should no be construed as a charge of cowardice on the part of Grant--he was no coward. He wandered off in the same manner during the Battle of Chapultepec which resulted in the fall of Mexico City a year and half later, and ended by rounding up an NCO and a few enlisted men, and hauling a howitzer up into the bell tower of church, from which he shelled the defenders of the San Cosme gate, the surrender of which sealed the fate of the city. Grant did not accomplish this feat alone, two brigades were involved in the assault, but Grant having wander off from the 4th Infantry, showed up in the right place at the right time with the right plan--he had a talent for landing on his feet.

Grant left the Army after that war (which he was to describe in his memoirs as unjust, comparing the United States as a bully to the worst European monarchies), and only returned to military service when Governor Yates of Illinois called upon him to organize the volunteers who were streaming into Springfield in 1861. He recounts his first, small campaign in the field, and actually in a rather modest fashion. The 21st Regiment of Illinois Volunteer Infantry was poorly disciplined and almost mutinous, so when Grant asked Yates for a commission, he was made a Colonel of United States Volunteers (which is different from being an officer in the Regular Army), and given the misfit regiment, with orders to clear the Confederates out of Leadville, Missouri. Grant recounts how he grew more and more apprehensive (he was, in Jackson's words, taking counsel of his fears) in the three days it took the regiment to march to the enemy camp, at which time he found it deserted, and discovered that his opponent had retreated, abandoning a good deal of equipment, as soon as he heard of the Federal advance. He comments that he learned a valuable lesson from this, to the effect that the other man is as badly scared as you are. He concluded that military success consisted largely in perseverance.

He was promoted Brigadier General of U. S. Volunteers at the urging of his hometown congressman (he had been living in Galena, Illinois when the war began). Frémont was then in command of Missouri, having not yet had the opportunity to ruin his military career as he would in Virginia the following year, and he placed Grant in command of southeast Missouri. The impeccable attired and pious Archbishop Leonidas Polk seized Columbus, Kentucky on the Mississippi River, and Grant immediately riposted by seizing Paducah. Grant had chosen the more important post, but Columbus in Confederate hands could not be ignored. He decided to drive Gideon Pillow from Belmont, Missouri, which would not only rid southeast Missouri of Confederates, but would also make Columbus untenable. The U. S. Navy landed the troops, and covered the landing place, and the troops marched off to the Confederate camp, driving the Southerners from their post. They then fell to looting the camp, and dissolved as a military formation. Grant then blithely describes how he rode off alone into the woods along the road between the landing and the Confederate camp. In his absence, the Federal line disintegrated into looters, Pillow rallied his men and counterattacked, and Grant's little army and his career were only saved because John A. Logan had kept his "down home boys" of the 31st Illinois Regiment of United States Volunteer Infantry well in hand, and had a line to stop the Confederates as their Yankee comrades ran for their lives. Grant saw some Southern horesemen across a cornfield, and rode off to the landing, arriving just as the last boat was loading and the Navy were preparing to skedaddle.

Grant now conducted a remorselessly persistent campaign to remove all threat to western Kentucky, and to drive the Confederates from western Tennessee. And he continued his bizarre penchant for not being there when things were getting interesting. At Fort Henry, a fluke shot from a Navy gunboat dismounted the largest Confederate gun in the fort with the first shot, and with their water batteries (i.e, the gun emplacements at the edge of the river) flooded, the Confederates abandoned the position and retreated to Fort Donelson. Grant was unaware that the action had even begun when the battle was won. It appears that he was taking his breakfast with Admiral Foote on Foote's gunboat at the time.

He then marched his forces overland to Fort Donelson on the Cumberland River (the Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers were only a little over ten miles apart at that point). The weather had turned very nasty, and the Federal forces were obliged to bivouac in ice storms outside the field works at Fort Donelson. The old Mexican War hero and warhorse Gideon Pillow was eager to attack, while the two senior officers, Simon Buckner and John B. Floyd were chewing their nails and whining about an unkind fate. They agreed to allow Pillow to attack (Grant had not completely encircled the "fort," and all Pillow needed to do was drive in the Federal flank so that the Confederates could escape). The attack was planned for February 14, but Pillow had lost his nerve, saying their movements had been detected. Floyd became enraged, and seems to have again contemplated surrender, although his reputation was sufficiently blackened by the debacle at Fort Donelson, that such matters are doubtful. Pillow regained his confidence the next morning, and was initially successful, and Grant was once again absent, again, it appears, dining with Admiral Foote.

But what saved Grant was what was to save this odd warrior throughout the war. His subordinates, in this case, Smith, Wallace and McClernand, hauled his chestnuts out of the fire for him, counterattacking on their own initiative. As it was, N. B. Forrest, disgusted with the surrender of the fort, rode out with all his cavalry, and as many of the infantry as could be mounted, or ride double, and escaped the Federals not only unscathed, but unchallenged.

More later . . .
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Jan, 2008 08:12 pm
Grant showed a remarkable talent for selecting and advancing the interests of competent officers. He was also successful at insulating himself from the schemes of ambitious subordinates. William T. Sherman was by early 1862 considered to be somewhat of a crackpot by many, and even completely insane by a few. Although Henry Halleck even offered to give Sherman Grant's command, Sherman said that he would rather serve under Grant (whom he outranked), and corresponded cordially with Grant. That loyalty was repaid, and a mutual loyalty created which would last through the rest of the war. At the same time, Grant was saddled with John McClernand, a political appointee, one of the "War Democrats" whom Lincoln wished to cultivate. McClernand thought he should be in command, not Grant. He plotted against Grant constantly, and was responsible for the rumors which circulated widely and reached the press to the effect that Grant was a drunkard. Nevertheless, he had shown himself to be a competent officer and a tenacious fighter--so Grant kept him on, and carefully avoided the repercussions of McClernand's political plotting. When McClernand finally overreached himself, Grant bided his time, and dismissed him for insubordination near the end of the seige of Vicksburg. But McClernand had rendered good service, and Grant endured him for as long as he was useful. Grant did not suffer fools, but he tolerated the scheming and intrigues of those who were not fools, so long as they did their duty and rendered useful service.

Ultimately, that was Grant's greatest strength. He never displayed any particular skill as a field commander above the level of a regiment. He had an odd habit of wandering off both when battle was pending, and even when battle was joined. His staff was mediocre at best, and he mostly kept about him those officers he found congenial and who were willing to do a little dirty work for him now and again. He relied upon the staff work of his subordinates for the nuts and bolts of moving and fighting his armies, and he was seldom disappointed in the results, since he chose his subordinates well.

The other determining characteristic beyond his ability to chose and use his subordinates well, was his drive. That lesson he learned at Leadville, that the other man is as frightened as you are, was one he applied again and again. Most commanders would have come to pieces if they had suffered a debacle such as he suffered in the first day of Shiloh (and once again, he was not on the scene when the battle began--he had been injured a few days before when his horse slipped in the mud and fell on him, and he was down-river on a gunboat when Johnston attacked). Grant remained unflappable, and did despair. He waited for Wallace (and cherished a grudge against him ever after), and he waited for Don Carlos Buell, who arrived in the nick of time, and then he took the battle to the enemy. He showed a calm tenacity throughout his civil war career. Lincoln constantly said that he needed to find someone who understood the numbers (that the North could sustain the war longer, and sustain more casualties than the South could afford), and in Grant, he had found that man.
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  2  
Reply Tue 28 Sep, 2010 12:31 pm
What a marvelous thread. Some of the best writing Set ever did on this site.

I just finished John Keegan's The American Civil War and it is by far the best book on the subject I have ever read. Even so, some of Set's posts rival Keegan's work.

http://www.randomhouse.com/images/dyn/cover/?source=9780307263438&height=300&maxwidth=170
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, EVERYONE! - Discussion by OmSigDAVID
WIND AND WATER - Discussion by Setanta
Who ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall? - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
True version of Vlad Dracula, 15'th century - Discussion by gungasnake
ONE SMALL STEP . . . - Discussion by Setanta
History of Gun Control - Discussion by gungasnake
Where did our notion of a 'scholar' come from? - Discussion by TuringEquivalent
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/03/2024 at 12:52:39