1
   

Is the sentence correct?

 
 
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2007 11:21 am
I've read that either'is' or 'are' can be used.
I've read that either'is' or 'are' could be used.

I believe both sentences are correct, but I notice that native speakers often use 'could'. Coud someone tell me the reason/ difference, please?

Many thanks.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 567 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2007 11:24 am
It simply means that the speaker would rather not be seen to make an absolute statement, and therefore uses the conditional.

Rather than saying: "Yoong, you are making a mistake,"--i might soften the implied criticism by saying: "Yoong, you could be making a mistake."

Therefore, to speak more cautiously, and to sound less censorious in some circumstances, native speakers of English often use could rather than can, would rather than will, and should rather than shall.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2007 11:31 am
Setanta wrote:
It simply means that the speaker would rather not be seen to make an absolute statement, and therefore uses the conditional.

Rather than saying: "Yoong, you are making a mistake,"--i might soften the implied criticism by saying: "Yoong, you could be making a mistake."

Therefore, to speak more cautiously, and to sound less censorious in some circumstances, native speakers of English often use could rather than can, would rather than will, and should rather than shall.


Hey, Set, I'll do the drinking here.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2007 11:41 am
gustavratzenhofer wrote:
Hey, Set, I'll do the drinking here.


Be my guest, i don't take strong drink.

I have complete and utter faith in your ability to drink for the two of us.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2007 11:44 am
Setanta wrote:
gustavratzenhofer wrote:
Hey, Set, I'll do the drinking here.


Be my guest, i don't take strong drink.

I have complete and utter faith in your ability to drink for the two of us.


As you should.
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2007 11:49 am
"Speak more cautiously, sound less censorious" would be an excellent sig line for you, Setanta.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2007 11:51 am
You get him, wandel! You go, dog!
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2007 12:02 pm
wandeljw wrote:
"Speak more cautiously, sound less censorious" would be an excellent sig line for you, Setanta.


Don't hold your breath, 'K, Wandel?
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Dec, 2007 02:40 pm
Both can and could are conditional. In this case they share the meaning, "It's possible".

1. I've read that either 'is' or 'are' can be used.

I've read that it's possible to use either 'is' or 'are'.


2. I've read that either 'is' or 'are' could be used.

I've read that it's possible to use either 'is' or 'are'.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Is the sentence correct?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/29/2024 at 12:28:48