This reminds me of a thread I started after the wave of French riots in 2005. It was called
Comparing the French & LA riots: Number of casualties, why?
In the opening post, I wrote:
nimh wrote:Lifting out this post on one of the Paris riots threads as a separate question, because [..] I don't want to import the US political discussion into a thread about France; but it
is a question that made me think, and I still don't really have a conclusive answer.
nimh wrote:Random fact of the day:
Number of people who died in the 1992 LA riots:
52.
(That's the correction given in
this Francosceptic story to the "200 people" cited by French finance minister Thierry Breton, who was urging for "perspective".)
Number of people who died in the France-wide riots so far:
1.
Anyone any suggestions on how to explain the difference?
The nature of the riots? Those involved? Gun control?
Now I realise that last month's riots in in Villiers-le-Bel were notably more violent than those across suburbs in the country in 2005. The Independent described "massed attacks on police [..] on Monday evening when 82 officers were injured, some by pellets from shot-guns and light hunting rifles", and noted that:
Quote:The evidence of the second night's rioting - more than 80 policemen injured by shotgun and airgun pellets, including four seriously - suggests that the level of urban violence has ratcheted up alarmingly. Few guns were used during the three weeks of nationwide riots in 2005.
On Monday night, the youths [..] attacked the police head on. In 2005, there were thousands of incidents of arson but few direct confrontations.
Nevertheless, with still not a single death on the records in the French riots (far as I know), the contrast with the casualty numbers of the LA riots remains striking. So the question remains current. Feel free to
revive the thread...