Republicans Take Off the Gloves in You-Tube Debate

I thought Hill looked good in the last debate. Joe Biden always looks good when he gets a chance to sandwich in between the "Big Three".

Cycloptichorn wrote:

Ticomaya wrote:

au1929 wrote:

Ticomaya
If you think that was a creditable performance from people who are seeking the highest office in the US . I must question what is in the cigar you are smoking. If it were a TV reality show it would have been billed as Dumbed,dumber and dumbest.

Before I try to gauge your take on this particular issue, au, can you tell me what you thought of the Democratic candidates in their last debate. Any creditable performers there, worthy of the highest office in the US?

Ah, the 'your guys sucked too' defense.

It's not a defense, but I understand your weakened leftist psyche on this matter, Cyclops.

Au may very well think all of the Democrats sucked too, and that there is no good candidate in the field. But, my asking for his opinion on the matter is hardly a "defense" to his claim that all of the Republican candidates "sucked." But it will certainly help me judge his opinion, based on whom he believes to be a creditable candidate for President, in any.

Quote:

Truthfully, Obama and Clinton looked fine for the Dems, and in the last Republican debate, McCain and Huck did great. Romney did okay. Giuliani did terrible. But, he's going down in flames anyways.

I concur re McCain and Huck. I think they were the clear winners in the last debate. Romney did poorly, I thought.

that was not the last debate... although I knew that was what you were getting at.... it's the only bullet in your gun..... I think one slightly sub par performance in the debates after 7 years of bush.... well, you do the math.

Both parties candidates, the major ones anyway, will continue to look week during these so called YouTube Q & A sessions. Given that the questions are stacked in advanced to favor the media's choices, Clinton, Obama specifically, one can not take these Q & A's very seriously.

woiyo wrote:

Both parties candidates, the major ones anyway, will continue to look week during these so called YouTube Q & A sessions. Given that the questions are stacked in advanced to favor the media's choices, Clinton, Obama specifically, one can not take these Q & A's very seriously.

That's my point about Blitzer. He coached her into not answering the question fully, but only yes or no, because he didn't want her to answer poorly, like she did the last time she tried.