0
   

Voters' Bill of Rights

 
 
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 03:49 am
America needs a Voters' Bill of Rights, i.e. something to eliminate the worst abuses of our system and allow the ordinary citizen to think there might be some point to voting in elections; what we have now is vanishingly close to a one-party system. A minimal list of items I'd like to have in such a list would be:

* 1. The most major item: Runoff Elections. Nobody should ever fear to vote his first choice, at least on a first ballot, and nobody should ever hold any public office with less than 50% of the vote.

* 2. A "None of the Above" choice on all elections for public office. And whenever this None of the Above" choice wins, the other candidates should be barred for life from running for public offices and the parties which sponsored them should be barred from running anybody for that particular office for 20 years, i.e. until the entire leadership echelons of the parties have turned over. The penalty for sponsoring dead wood for public office should be horrific.

* 3. An outright guarantee against vote fraud and horrific penalties for it. To me this means that somehow or other, individual votes have to be traceable.

* 4. Candidates for public office beyond some level should be required to pass at least a secret and possibly a TS security check like anybody else who ever handles classified information. The idea of somebody like Slick KKKlinton, who clearly could not pass the simplest such test to be a guard at the gate of any military base being POTUS is basically obscene. This would also prevent the William Jeffersons and Marion Barrys from holding public offices.

* 5. An update to the impeachment process: if a president is ever impeached and removed, his vice president goes out the door with him, and the office is handed over to the oldest person of his party in the US Senate on condition that he never run for the office again. Nobody should profit from their own misdeeds or failings; likewise it should not be easy to remove a president, but it should not be impossible either, and if we were not able to remove Slick, we wouldn't have been able to remove Hitler or Mussolini either. Trent Lott rightly refused to hand the presidency and the incumbency over to Algor with a year to go on Slick's final term; nonetheless the clown needed to go, badly.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 980 • Replies: 22
No top replies

 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 04:17 am
Spiro Agnew was a patriot. Bill Clinton was a communist and should have be executed by firing squad. What america needs is a good 5 cent cigar.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 10:37 am
What's a cigar without a humidor?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 10:42 am
gungasnake posts his thread "The KKKLINTONS Suck" number 1401.

he should just number them.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 12:16 pm
I think that the impeachment of Bush and his "frontal lobe" would have been solid policy in 2003 but was an impossibility with most of the GOP lobbyists lined up at the tit to cash in on war profits.
Now, , impoeaching the turd would just occupy valuable time . Hes gone in a a year and a month. HE cant possible screw anything up more than it already is. Now lets pray for more incidents of acute illnesses to hit the SUpreme Court during the presidential campaign.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 12:21 pm
I respectfully disagree farmerman. there's a lot damage he could do. I believe he craves the invasion of Iran and I think he dreams of dropping a nuke somewhere before he leaves...
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 12:28 pm
Then I would have to reconsider my post. Youre basically saying that Bush is a madman?

madGEorge? hmmmm, has a ring to it. He better not nuke Iran before I get back from the Home Depot. Ill need all the duct tapeI can buy.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 12:30 pm
farmerman wrote:
Then I would have to reconsider my post. Youre basically saying that Bush is a madman?

madGEorge? hmmmm, has a ring to it. He better not nuke Iran before I get back from the Home Depot. Ill need all the duct tapeI can buy.


yes
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 01:31 pm
Here's hoping the next time some lunatic like Saddam Hussein poisons the US senate office building with anthrax, the POTUS simply says

Quote:

Hey' that's cool, here's maps for Farmerman, Bpbear, and Blatham's neighborhoods, been too long since anybody caught anthrax in any of those places, go get em!!!


****ing loud-mouthed idiots....
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 01:48 pm
tsk tsk gunga.... why don't you come to our neighborhoods and dispose of us yourself? Do your country a service? I'd be happy to provide you with my address if you would give me the pleasure of coming to my home to start some trouble....
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 01:51 pm
The DC/Baltimroe area has its own slums....
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 02:45 pm
punkass nut
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 04:01 pm
Come, come, gentlemen, as our pub landlord occasionally has to say, this is no way for grown men to conduct themselves.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 05:18 pm
gungasnake wrote:
The DC/Baltimroe area has its own slums....


I'm sure if it wasn't for that you'd be down on the first flight to give me the beating I so richly deserve..... .
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 06:58 pm
I gotta be in Raleigh on the 8th of Dec. I'll send ya some nice vibes from close range...
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Nov, 2007 08:05 pm
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
I respectfully disagree farmerman. there's a lot damage he could do. I believe he craves the invasion of Iran and I think he dreams of dropping a nuke somewhere before he leaves...


And if your wrong?
If there is no war with Iran before Bush leaves office, will you admit that you are wrong?
If we dont use nukes while Bush is President, will you admit you are wrong?

I still think that war with Iran will happen, but AFTER a dem becomes President.
Dems need to prove they are tough also.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Nov, 2007 01:04 am
how could i not admit i was wrong if it doesn't happen? be real...
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Nov, 2007 03:54 am
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
how could i not admit i was wrong if it doesn't happen? be real...


I can think of a couple of instances where you refused to admit you were wrong when your predictions didnt come true.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Nov, 2007 05:24 am
MM, the bear wasnt making a prediction, he was disagreeing with my assessment that probably Bush cant do anything more to ****up this country and destroy the middle class more than hes already done. That isnt really a prediction, its more of a hope.
You seem a bit slow on the comprehension skills


Gunga-you can count me in too. I could use a good ass kicking, if thats how you think youd feel better. But then Id introduce you to my attorney who would begin processiing the transfer of everything you own to my accounts. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Mon 19 Nov, 2007 07:20 am
A short process, I expect.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Voters' Bill of Rights
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 06/25/2025 at 10:34:10