Jane will be/ is living

Forums: English
Email this Topic • Print this Page

Jane is / will be living with her new in-laws after her wedding next month.

I think both 'is' and 'will be' work. Am I correct?

Many thanks.

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 520 • Replies: 9

No top replies

Yes, both are acceptable, perhaps with the nuances in brackets-

I am going to London next week. (I intend or plan to go to London)

I will be going to London next week. (I will definitely be going to London)

0 Replies

Thanks, Contrex.

0 Replies

contrex wrote:

Yes, both are acceptable, perhaps with the nuances in brackets-

I am going to London next week. (I intend or plan to go to London)

I will be going to London next week. (I will definitely be going to London)

Howdy Contex and Yoong Liat.

Both structures are used as future indicators. The second certainly could have 'will' marking more than a simple future. It could express determination, insistence, etc.

But as a simple marker of futurity, it holds the same degree of certainty that "present continuous for the future". It is also the same as,

I'm going to go to London next week.

I go to London next week.

0 Replies

JTT wrote:

I go to London next week.

In my experience, this is the way one would phrase it if one were describing an agenda or itinerary.

My trip to Scotland is arranged. I go to Edinburgh on Monday, I stay there until Wednesday when I fly to Orkney. I return to London on Friday.

0 Replies

contrex wrote:

JTT wrote:
I go to London next week.

In my experience, this is the way one would phrase it if one were describing an agenda or itinerary.

My trip to Scotland is arranged. I go to Edinburgh on Monday, I stay there until Wednesday when I fly to Orkney. I return to London on Friday.

I agree, Contrex. But it's still a future and that future can also be described by <be>, <will> or <present>, right?

0 Replies

JTT wrote:

I agree, Contrex. But it's still a future and that future can also be described by <be>, <will> or <present>, right?

Yes but it would sound or look awkward if used indiscriminately. It is a special future usage for special situations.

0 Replies

contrex wrote:

JTT wrote:
I agree, Contrex. But it's still a future and that future can also be described by <be>, <will> or <present>, right?

Yes but it would sound or look awkward if used indiscriminately. It is a special future usage for special situations.

Certainly there are nuances involved in all language choice. But,

My trip to Scotland is arranged. I go to Edinburgh on Monday, I stay there until Wednesday when I fly to Orkney. I return to London on Friday.

could just as easily be described by, "I will go to Edinburgh..." or "I'm going to go to Edinburgh ..." or "I'm going to Edinburgh ..."

for they too can be used to describe "arranged" future actions.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Why do my words keep disappearing when I place them in these, <>.

I wrote twice containing the words in quotation marks in <>:

I agree, Contrex. But it's still a future and that future can also be described by "be going to + verb", will or "present continuous for the future, right?

And it came out,

I agree, Contrex. But it's still a future and that future can also be described by <be>, <will> or <present>, right?

Do these dohickeys, <>, have a special formatting purpose?

0 Replies

JTT wrote:

Do these dohickeys, <>, have a special formatting purpose?

yes, i believe it has something to do with html code...

0 Replies

Region Philbis wrote:

JTT wrote:
Do these dohickeys, <>, have a special formatting purpose?

yes, i believe it has something to do with html code...

Thanks, Region.

0 Replies

Jane will be/ is living

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know