contrex wrote:Cjhsa is just a troll.
It's my thread you *******!
I think cjhsa is an agent provocateur.
He's out to discredit the right and doing a damn fine job of it too.
cjhsa wrote:Walter Hinteler wrote:
B) What exactly do you mean with "looser"? At what exatly in my private or business or job life did make me a looser?
ROTFLMFAO!
Neither does this answer that question nor did you say anything to the others.
Whoa! Like Democrats NEVER take things out of context to make their "points" with the proletariat. Give me a break!
What I would like to see BOTH parties do is refrain from attacking long enough to come up with an "agenda" (they used to be called party "platforms") a voter could either reject or take up with. Then "sell" us poor, dumb voters the positives of that agenda instead of trying to convince us that they will only do some nefarious "good" instead of "bad" like the "other" party does all the time.
I am well aware of things that the "other" party has done wrong.... I want to see remedies, ideas, concepts, something to work with, not general platitudes of the "we'll make you feel good" type.
A pox on both houses with a large helping of scorn for dessert.
Halfback
Interesting game of who said this:
In that line:
Who said this:
"There ought to be limits to freedom"
Answer George Bush
Or this:
"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier...just as long as I'm the dictator"
Answer George Bush
Or this:
"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy."
Answer Henry Kissinger
"Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. "
Answer George Bush
"I know two types of law because I know two types of men, those who are with us and those who are against us."
Answer Hermann Goering, 1936
Walter Hinteler wrote:cjhsa wrote:Walter Hinteler wrote:
B) What exactly do you mean with "looser"? At what exatly in my private or business or job life did make me a looser?
ROTFLMFAO!
Neither does this answer that question nor did you say anything to the others.
Still LMAO over this one. Did you honestly believe I spelled that wrong? Was your intent to correct me? EFFING FUNNY!
cjhsa wrote:Yeah, there's a real cause for celebration. Our currency is so high we've totally lost tourism from the wealthiest country on earth. Whatever loser.
You are gaining Canadian tourism cause our dollar is now so high compared to yours. Sorry, loser.
Intrepid wrote:cjhsa wrote:Yeah, there's a real cause for celebration. Our currency is so high we've totally lost tourism from the wealthiest country on earth. Whatever loser.
You are gaining Canadian tourism cause our dollar is now so high compared to yours. Sorry, loser.
Three people in stupid hats isn't tourism, loser.
No, no. Look beyond the mirror and you will see them.
