0
   

Future Wars May Be Fought Over Water, Not Oil

 
 
au1929
 
Reply Sat 27 Oct, 2007 12:47 pm
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,072 • Replies: 10
No top replies

 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Oct, 2007 12:54 pm
With the melting of the arctic ice cap which threatens flood coastal cities around the world and the impending shortage of clean water. There will be water,water everywhere with not a drop to drink.
0 Replies
 
Letty
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Oct, 2007 12:57 pm
Amen, Sam Coleridge. I have always claimed that an artesian well will be more valuable than an oil well.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Oct, 2007 01:38 pm
au1929 wrote:
With the melting of the arctic ice cap which threatens flood coastal cities around the world and the impending shortage of clean water. There will be water,water everywhere with not a drop to drink.


Then we'll have to evolve or mutate, won't we?

2050? Ha! Ha!...
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Oct, 2007 01:42 pm
Miller wrote:
au1929 wrote:
With the melting of the arctic ice cap which threatens flood coastal cities around the world and the impending shortage of clean water. There will be water,water everywhere with not a drop to drink.


Then we'll have to evolve or mutate, won't we?

2050? Ha! Ha!...


That may solve the problem with Social Security whose funds are slated to run out about the same time.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Oct, 2007 01:46 pm
Ive been investing in a public utility named Aqua America for a number of years. Their fundamentals are sound and they are well positioned.

Desalinization will be geting cheaper and well once again be awash in the stuff.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Oct, 2007 02:04 pm
au1929 wrote:
Miller wrote:
au1929 wrote:
With the melting of the arctic ice cap which threatens flood coastal cities around the world and the impending shortage of clean water. There will be water,water everywhere with not a drop to drink.


Then we'll have to evolve or mutate, won't we?

2050? Ha! Ha!...


That may solve the problem with Social Security whose funds are slated to run out about the same time.


How about an oral ion exchange resin implant for everyone?
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Oct, 2007 02:42 pm
from the DAILY HERALD - utah's leading newspaper :

Quote:
Saturday, October 27, 2007
America's pending freshwater crisis | Print |

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Skoloff - THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. -- An epic drought in Georgia threatens the water supply for millions. Florida doesn't have nearly enough water for its expected population boom. The Great Lakes are shrinking. Upstate New York's reservoirs have dropped to record lows. And in the West, the Sierra Nevada snowpack is melting faster each year.

Across America, the picture is critically clear -- the nation's freshwater supplies can no longer quench its thirst.

The government projects that at least 36 states will face water shortages within five years because of a combination of rising temperatures, drought, population growth, urban sprawl, waste and excess.

"Is it a crisis? If we don't do some decent water planning, it could be," said Jack Hoffbuhr, executive director of the Denver-based American Water Works Association.

Water managers will need to take bold steps to keep taps flowing, including conservation, recycling, desalination and stricter controls on development.

"We've hit a remarkable moment," said Barry Nelson, a senior policy analyst with the Natural Resources Defense Council. "The last century was the century of water engineering. The next century is going to have to be the century of water efficiency."

The price tag for ensuring a reliable water supply could be staggering. Experts estimate that just upgrading pipes to handle new supplies could cost the nation $300 billion over 30 years.

"Unfortunately, there's just not going to be any more cheap water," said Randy Brown, Pompano Beach's utilities director.

It's not just America's problem -- it's global.

Australia is in the midst of a 30-year dry spell, and population growth in urban centers of sub-Saharan Africa is straining resources. Asia has 60 percent of the world's population, but only about 30 percent of its freshwater.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a United Nations network of scientists, said this year that by 2050 up to 2 billion people worldwide could be facing major water shortages.

The U.S. used more than 148 trillion gallons of water in 2000, the latest figures available from the U.S. Geological Survey. That includes residential, commercial, agriculture, manufacturing and every other use -- almost 500,000 gallons per person.

Coastal states like Florida and California face a water crisis not only from increased demand, but also from rising temperatures that are causing glaciers to melt and sea levels to rise. Higher temperatures mean more water lost to evaporation. And rising seas could push saltwater into underground sources of freshwater.


Florida represents perhaps the nation's greatest water irony. A hundred years ago, the state's biggest problem was it had too much water. But decades of dikes, dams and water diversions have turned swamps into cities.

Little land is left to store water during wet seasons, and so much of the landscape has been paved over that water can no longer penetrate the ground in some places to recharge aquifers. As a result, the state is forced to flush millions of gallons of excess into the ocean to prevent flooding.


Also, the state dumps hundreds of billions of gallons a year of treated wastewater into the Atlantic through pipes -- water that could otherwise be used for irrigation.

Florida's environmental chief, Michael Sole, is seeking legislative action to get municipalities to reuse the wastewater.

"As these communities grow, instead of developing new water with new treatment systems, why not better manage the commodity they already have and produce an environmental benefit at the same time?" Sole said.

Florida leads the nation in water reuse by reclaiming some 240 billion gallons annually, but it is not nearly enough, Sole said.

Floridians use about 2.4 trillion gallons of water a year. The state projects that by 2025, the population will have increased 34 percent from about 18 million to more than 24 million people, pushing annual demand for water to nearly 3.3 trillion gallons.

More than half of the state's expected population boom is projected in a three-county area that includes Miami, Fort Lauderdale and Palm Beach, where water use is already about 1.5 trillion gallons a year.

"We just passed a crossroads. The chief water sources are basically gone," said John Mulliken, director of water supply for the South Florida Water Management District. "We really are at a critical moment in Florida history."

In addition to recycling and conservation, technology holds promise.

There are more than 1,000 desalination plants in the U.S., many in the Sunbelt, where baby boomers are retiring at a dizzying rate.

The Tampa Bay Seawater Desalination Plant is producing about 25 million gallons a day of fresh drinking water, about 10 percent of that area's demand. The $158 million facility is North America's largest plant of its kind. Miami-Dade County is working with the city of Hialeah to build a reverse osmosis plant to remove salt from water in deep brackish wells. Smaller such plants are in operation across the state.

Californians use nearly 23 trillion gallons of water a year, much of it coming from Sierra Nevada snowmelt. But climate change is producing less snowpack and causing it to melt prematurely, jeopardizing future supplies.

Experts also say the Colorado River, which provides freshwater to seven Western states, will probably provide less water in coming years as global warming shrinks its flow.

California, like many other states, is pushing conservation as the cheapest alternative, looking to increase its supply of treated wastewater for irrigation and studying desalination, which the state hopes could eventually provide 20 percent of its freshwater.

"The need to reduce water waste and inefficiency is greater now than ever before," said Benjamin Grumbles, assistant administrator for water at the Environmental Protection Agency. "Water efficiency is the wave of the future."




source :
FRESHWATER CRISIS

canadian prime minister pearson (1963-1968) predicted in the 1960's that WATER would become a more scarce resource than oil .
since the great lakes water levels were quite high at that time , he was ridiculed for his statement !
hope he is hearing the latest news !
hbg
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Oct, 2007 02:47 pm
I hope they're reading about this water shortage down in New Orleans...
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Oct, 2007 04:16 pm
it seems that the rising ocean (salt water) is going to be an additional problem :

Quote:
And rising seas could push saltwater into underground sources of freshwater.


not good news for new orleans either , so it seems .
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Nov, 2007 04:39 pm
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Three Southeastern governors who are in Washington to lobby for water rights amid a potentially catastrophic drought are likely to put the Bush administration on the spot.

Georgia's Lake Allatoona is one of two reservoirs that serve sprawling Atlanta and are shrinking in the drought.


If the administration decides to bolster Georgia's drinking supply, Alabama and Florida may claim it's crippling their economies to satisfy uncontrolled growth around Atlanta. If it continues releasing water downstream to Alabama and Florida, Georgia could argue that one of the nation's largest cities is being hung out to dry.

Making matters worse for President Bush is the fact that all three states have Republican governors whose reputations could rise or fall based on their handling of the crisis.

"It does put him into a bind," said Rep. Lynn Westmoreland, R-Georgia. "I think there's some give and take on everybody's part, and I think the president is the only one that can sit down with these three governors and say, 'Look, guys, we got a problem. ... We're all looking bad."'

Leaders from the states are scheduled to meet Thursday to try to hash out a temporary arrangement and later talk with Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne, who was sent to the region last week by Bush.

In an interview Tuesday, Kempthorne said the administration has not made any decisions on the dispute, which dates back to the late 1980s.

"If it were easy it would have been solved 18 years ago," Kempthorne said. "There have been good-faith efforts, but there's also been millions of dollars spent in the courts and we do not have a solution. ... There needs to be something where everyone says we gained here while we know we may have had to give up something else."


At issue is how much water the Army Corps of Engineers should capture in federal reservoirs near the head of two river basins in north Georgia that flow south into Florida and Alabama.

The fast-growing Atlanta region relies on the lakes for drinking water. But power plants in Florida and Alabama depend on healthy flows in the rivers, as do farms, commercial fisheries, industrial users and municipalities.

The corps also is required to release adequate flows to ensure habitats for several species of mussels and sturgeon that are protected under the Endangered Species Act.

Georgia officials have argued that the corps is turning a blind eye to a potential humanitarian crisis in Atlanta by ignoring warnings that the city's main water source, Lake Lanier, could have just a few months' worth of water remaining. The state sued the corps last month, arguing that Georgia has sacrificed more than other states and that the federal government is putting mussels before people.

That posture riled neighboring leaders, who said it ignored their needs.

Alabama Gov. Bob Riley accused Georgians last week of "watering their lawns and flowers" all summer and expecting Washington to "bail them out." Florida Gov. Charlie Crist wrote Bush to say his state was "unwilling to allow the unrealistic demands of one region to further compromise the downstream communities."

At a speech in Montgomery on Tuesday, Riley held up a poster-size map of Alabama and Georgia and showed that the exceptional drought area in Alabama is much larger than in Georgia. He said the state's economic prosperity was at stake.

"This is about whether Alabama gets its fair share and whether we are going to have to lay off people in Alabama," he said.

The Interior Department and the corps are now exploring options for adjusting water releases, trying to determine how they might capture more water in the lakes while continuing to meet the demands downstream. But each state already accuses the corps of ignoring its interests, so any significant change likely would be met with further litigation.


"It's only going to antagonize somebody," said Charles Bullock, a political scientist at the University of Georgia. "You have three Republican governors. The delegations in Congress of these states are predominantly Republican, so it's not easy politically. There's really no easy way out of it."

According to the National Drought Mitigation Center, almost a third of the Southeast is covered by an exceptional drought, the worst category.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Future Wars May Be Fought Over Water, Not Oil
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 06:32:35