1
   

AT LAST! 'NYT' To End Pay Policy re Columnists on Web Site

 
 
Reply Tue 18 Sep, 2007 08:35 am
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 409 • Replies: 11
No top replies

 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Sep, 2007 08:40 am
Good!

I'm a subscriber so I've gotten TimesSelect free (as in, this won't change anything for me), but I think this is the right thing to do.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Sep, 2007 08:42 am
I just hope they don't delete your "saved articles" directory. I've used mine extensively.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Sep, 2007 08:50 am
I'm glad. I always thought it was an iffy move for them, an odd move regarding spread of "illumination" and discussion, and, as a non-subscriber and a non-TS fee payer, I was routinely annoyed by not being able to read the selected pieces.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Sep, 2007 09:01 am
... on the other hand, from travelling to America and looking at the quality of other news outlets, especially the "fair and balanced" ones, I've come away with a very strong conviction that quality reporting is worth paying for. (We Germans, too, have our conservative/commercial junk media, but it's not quite as bad here -- yet.) The paper NYT is not an option for me, so I was glad for this opportunity to support them. Oh well, maybe I'll subscribe to an NPR member station instead ....
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Sep, 2007 09:13 am
Part of the population that would appreciated reading the selected items cannot easily afford, or afford at all, the fee, even if they think the material "worth it".
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Sep, 2007 09:16 am
Sure. I'm not blaming you for liking it that their content is free again.
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Sep, 2007 09:22 am
Re: AT LAST! 'NYT' To End Pay Policy re Columnists on Web Si
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:


I find this statement confusing. Are they trying to say that only 787,000 people have read the NYTimes on-line over the last 2 years? I'd find that hard to believe.

Maybe they mean that there are 787,000 people that have created accounts on the NYTimes WWW site but I'd find even that hard to believe. All of us that were former Abuzz members had NYTimes accounts.

I'll have to go see if I can find any traffic count numbers but I'd be surprised if the NYTimes gets less than a million unique hits daily.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Sep, 2007 09:30 am
Re: AT LAST! 'NYT' To End Pay Policy re Columnists on Web Si
fishin wrote:
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:


I find this statement confusing. Are they trying to say that only 787,000 people have read the NYTimes on-line over the last 2 years? I'd find that hard to believe.

The way I parse the statement, they had 560,000 paying subscribers before they introduced Times Select. Now, thanks to Times Select, they have 787,000 -- 227,000 more.

fishin wrote:
I'll have to go see if I can find any traffic count numbers but I'd be surprised if the NYTimes gets less than a million unique hits daily.

Remember you don't want the hits to the free content. You want the hits to the area behind the gate at which you have to pay for access. 787,000 unique visitors to the gated part of the site sounds reasonable to me.
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Sep, 2007 09:31 am
Interesting!

Quote:
EXCLUSIVE: Traffic Report on Top 30 Web Sites for July

By E&P Staff

Published: August 19, 2007 2:35 PM ET

NEW YORK The New York Times again tops newspaper Web sites in terms of traffic for July, according to the latest data from Nielsen//Net Ratings. Compared to June, NYT.com's unique audience rose to 14,149,000 from 12,535,000. All the papers that made the top five slots in July experienced growth in traffic when compared to June data.


http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003627048

14 million unique visitors per day. That 787,000 number bugs me for some reason. Razz
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Sep, 2007 09:33 am
Re: AT LAST! 'NYT' To End Pay Policy re Columnists on Web Si
Thomas wrote:
fishin wrote:
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:


I find this statement confusing. Are they trying to say that only 787,000 people have read the NYTimes on-line over the last 2 years? I'd find that hard to believe.

The way I parse the statement, they had 560,000 paying subscribers before they introduced Times Select. Now, thanks to Times Select, they have 787,000 -- 227,000 more.


Ah! Ok, that makes more sense. :wink:
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Sep, 2007 09:36 am
Those 14 million includes visitors to the free part of the site though. It doesn't surprise me if that's 20 times more than the number of visitors to the gated parted. If A2K charged $10/month from its members, I can easily see membership fall by a factor of 20. (Even a factor 100, if you think of all our members who barely post.)
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » AT LAST! 'NYT' To End Pay Policy re Columnists on Web Site
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 07/08/2025 at 04:31:35