1
   

Report: Hijackers deliberately crashed Flight 93

 
 
Reply Thu 7 Aug, 2003 08:19 pm
Report: Hijackers deliberately crashed Flight 93

WASHINGTON (AP) --U.S. investigators now believe that a hijacker in the cockpit aboard United Airlines Flight 93 instructed terrorist-pilot Ziad Jarrah to crash the jetliner into a Pennsylvania field because of a passenger uprising in the cabin.

This theory, based on the government's analysis of cockpit recordings, discounts the popular perception of insurgent passengers grappling with terrorists to seize the plane's controls.

The government's findings -- laid out deep within the report on the September 11, 2001, attacks that was sent to Congress last month -- aim to resolve one of the enduring mysteries of the deadliest terror attacks in U.S. history: What happened in the final minutes aboard Flight 93?

The FBI strenuously maintains that its analysis does not diminish the heroism of passengers who -- with the words "Let's roll" -- apparently rushed down the airliner's narrow aisle to try to overtake the hijackers.

President Bush and Attorney General John Ashcroft have regularly praised the courage of those aboard Flight 93, some of whom told family members by telephone they were planning to storm the cockpit.

"While no one will ever know exactly what transpired in the final minutes of Flight 93, every shred of evidence indicates this plane crashed because of the heroic actions of the passengers," FBI spokeswoman Susan Whitson said.

Thirty-three passengers, seven crew members and the four hijackers died.

Citing transcripts of the still-secret cockpit recordings, FBI Director Robert Mueller told congressional investigators in a closed briefing last year that, minutes before Flight 93 hit the ground, one of the hijackers "advised Jarrah to crash the plane and end the passengers' attempt to retake the airplane."

Jarrah is thought to have been the terrorist-pilot because he was the only of the four hijackers aboard known to have a pilot's license.

Mueller's description was disclosed in a brief passage far into the 858-page report to Congress. Previous statements by FBI and other government officials have been ambiguous about what occurred in the cockpit.

Mueller's explanation was based on the FBI's efforts to decipher the cacophonous sounds on the cockpit recorder and produce a comprehensive transcript, said one official, speaking only on condition of anonymity.

The FBI is convinced it may never know for certain what transpired in those final moments, but Mueller represented the information as the FBI's leading theory, this official said.

The same cockpit recording was played privately in April 2002 for family members of victims aboard Flight 93, and the FBI also provided them with its best effort at producing an understandable transcript.

Some family members indicated afterward they were led to believe that passengers used a food cart as a shield and successfully broke into the cockpit.

The FBI has been loath to publicly put forward a contradictory theory out of sensitivity to the families and because of uncertainty about what happened.

People who have heard the recording describe it as nearly indecipherable, containing static noises, cockpit alarms and wind interspersed with cries in English and Arabic. Near the end of the tape, sounds can be heard of breaking glass and crashing dishes -- lending credence to the theory that passengers used the food cart to rush the jetliner's narrow aisle.

Separately, the data recorder showed the plane's wings rocking violently as the jet flew too low and too fast for safe flight.

Intelligence officials believe the likely target for Flight 93 was the White House, based on information from Abu Zubaydah, a senior al-Qaida terrorist leader in U.S. custody who is believed to have played a key role in organizing the September 11 attacks.

Prosecutors have sought a U.S. judge's permission to play recordings from Flight 93 during the terrorism trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the only defendant in a U.S. case prosecutors have directly tied to the attacks. Moussaoui is accused of conspiring with the hijackers.

The government has said it can link Moussaoui to Jarrah, using a telephone number found on a business card recovered at the Shanksville, Pennsylvania, crash site. Prosecutors believe the card belonged to Jarrah and that Moussaoui had called the same number. (Full story)

Moussaoui has acknowledged allegiance to Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida but says he was not involved in the attacks.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 779 • Replies: 6
No top replies

 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Aug, 2003 09:12 pm
One thing I've always wondered is if it was sabotage from within -- if one of the Arab hijackers purposely disrupted the plan, and had always meant to. Crashing into the White House would have been huge. Sad
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Aug, 2003 01:21 am
BBB--

That's an interesting detail, but I don't think this changes the story all that much. What matters is that the capitol in Washington is still standing because the passengers of flight 93 decided to storm the cockpit. Who cares exactly who controlled the cockpit at the moment the plane crashed? It's a footnote in the big picture.

-- T.
0 Replies
 
LibertyD
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Aug, 2003 01:27 am
I agree with Thomas -- even if the hijackers were the ones who crashed the plane, they did it because of the threat from the passengers. So, the passengers are still heros whichever way it went.
0 Replies
 
NeoGuin
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Aug, 2003 06:29 am
OK, let me begin by saying that I feel a weird connection to one of the heroes of Flight 93. Jeremy(?) Glick was a National judo champion, as a now inactive student of Aikido (I will soon be resuming studies) I saw him as a comrade at arms.

But that spirit of standing up and resisiting is something that too many Americans are lacking, IMHO.

And if the account is true, the order was given out of fear that the passengers may have been able to regain control.

PS. I sometimes wonder what would have happened had the passengers been able to get control of the plane.
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Aug, 2003 06:33 am
I agree with Thomas and Liberty. The crash occurred because of the passenger uprising. Had they not acted, the plane would have hit the WH.

It doesn't lessen their courage or effectiveness one iota.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Aug, 2003 08:27 am
It's obvious to me that the hijackers murdered the pilot and others in the cockpit crew immediately to prevent any uprising being as successful as taking back the cockpit and flying the plane to safety. It doesn't diminish the heroism of those who had reason to believe the plane was going to be used as a bomb and acted accordingly (of course, sacrificing the other passengers but that still makes it the right decision).
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Report: Hijackers deliberately crashed Flight 93
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 05/01/2024 at 01:57:45