baddog1 wrote:Quote:Either you think it is ok for Christians to take actions (including voting, sponsoring legislation, running for office, etc) based upon their convictions -------
----- or you don't.
You want to have your cake and eat it too.
It seems ok to you, if they are acting in accordance with want you want. And they are violating separation of church and state if they act contrary to what you want.
There is a word for that.
Finally!!! Glad someone said this. "They" scream bloody murder about Christians pushing their opinions down other's throat - yet do not/will not recognize the
'h-word' of their own action in doing so. :wink:
No no no.
How are non-christians being hypocritical at all? The point Hokie makes is that so-called christians seem to pick and choose when they want to be political christians. He only quoted scripture to make the point thatthe so-called christians act quite contrary to their own beliefs.
He made no case that the bible should be selectively used for any political reason.
How have liberals forced anything down your throat? Just because people don't want to live under someone else's religious orthodoxy, does not mean that they are doing any thing hypocritical.
I'm still waiting for someone to tell me when the presence of religion in politics has helped a society.
Where is the systematic non-christian hypocracy? Where? I expect a concrete example. Direct question direct answer please.
T
K
O
