2
   

The 80th sashay through the Rainforest!

 
 
Stradee
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Sep, 2007 03:05 pm
ul, appears the critters vanished! Hurray! Very Happy

The Fall seasons just beginning - springlike weather - hot days, and warm gentle breezes during afternoon hours. Soon, vibrant colors of green, red, orange, gold, and purple gracing the landscape.

Yep - Paradise. Smile
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Sep, 2007 04:38 pm
aktbird57 - You and your 300 friends have supported 2,801,673.6 square feet!

~~~

ahhhhh, cool nights for sleeping, gotta love those

~~~

1 64.316 acres
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Sep, 2007 05:57 pm
Cool nights? Where, when?
0 Replies
 
danon5
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Sep, 2007 09:05 pm
sumac, here in Texas - go figure!!!

You guy's are having a hot time of it - Very Happy

Clicked - for all of us.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 04:17 am
20% daily chance of something happening, somewhere near all week long. Those are at least odds. We haven't even had that recently. Clicked.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 05:01 pm
clicked!

~~~

aktbird57 - You and your 300 friends have supported 2,802,001.4 square feet!

~~~

1 64.324 acres
0 Replies
 
danon5
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Sep, 2007 09:22 pm
I've clicked - - - Very Happy

One - or, two more Rain Forest Trees saved..... Very Happy

Happy Hunting Gang.... :wink:
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Sep, 2007 12:52 am
http://rainforest.care2.com

click Very Happy
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Sep, 2007 12:58 am
clicked. twice.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Sep, 2007 01:18 am
dagmaraka wrote:
clicked. twice.


Dagmaraka, We want a daily commitment from you or at least a halfassed one. Don't you know this is the coolest thread on A2K!!!!

WERE MAKING CHANGES HERE LADY! Very Happy

were saving trees. You belong here with us.

What'll it take? You name it.
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Sep, 2007 01:21 am
come up with some interesting offers. i'll consider them.

i'll try, cross my heart and hope to die (or as we slovaks use to say in the old days: honest pioneer pledge)
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Sep, 2007 04:07 am
Morning all. And Amigo, do you think that posting "clicked" is good enough? We want more from you too.

Will go click now.
0 Replies
 
danon5
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Sep, 2007 12:14 pm
I have clicked - and, MA has clicked....... Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Stradee
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Sep, 2007 04:02 pm
Whatta day!

Dang the new seasons just beginning - and the weathers awsome!

Gonna click then to the porch. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Sep, 2007 05:18 pm
clicked around the block

~~~

aktbird57 - You and your 300 friends have supported 2,802,516.5 square feet!

~~~

Saw my first red tree of the season today. Gotta get the camera out over the weekend.

~~~

1 64.334 acres
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Sep, 2007 07:54 pm
sumac wrote:
Morning all. And Amigo, do you think that posting "clicked" is good enough? We want more from you too.

Will go click now.
I got moted. Embarrassed


Click Very Happy
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 05:02 am
Gotta get a camera that works here. At about 7 am yesterday morning, while watering outside (shh, don't tell anyone), flock of geese flew over in V-formation. Touch of fall in the air here too, and gasp, weaterman "guaranteed" rain for tomorrow. Somewhere around here.

Clicked.
"
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 05:12 am
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 09:53 am
188 More Species Listed as Near Extinction

By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, September 13, 2007; A10



Habitat loss, climate change and infectious diseases are pushing a growing number of species toward extinction, according to a report yesterday by the World Conservation Union.

The organization's 2007 "Red List," the most sweeping annual scientific assessment of the world's animals and plants, now lists 16,306 species as threatened with extinction, up from 16,118 last year. The addition of nearly 200 imperiled species to the list reflects the reality that the more scientists learn about the status of the world's millions of species, the more they find that appear to be in trouble, experts said.

"We expect the situation across taxonomic groups to be, quite honest, quite bleak. One needs to know how bleak," Jane Smart, who heads the group's species program, said in an interview. "If we received a lot more money, we would have a lot more species on the Red List."

The organization, which is based in Switzerland and is formally known as the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN), enlists several thousand scientists to evaluate the state of animals and plants as varied as the imperiled Yangtze River dolphin and Central Asia's wild apricot. After subjecting the assessments to a peer-review process, the group decides whether a species deserves to be listed as vulnerable to extinction, endangered, critically endangered -- or extinct.

Conservation advocates said the new report had a few bright spots, such as North American reptiles doing relatively well. But in a news conference in Washington yesterday, they painted a largely grim picture of how factors such as armed conflict and warming seas are shrinking the planet's natural heritage.

"Let's not kid ourselves, when it comes to biodiversity worldwide, the news generally is not good," said Michael Hoffman, a program officer in IUCN's biodiversity assessment unit.

Great apes are under increasing pressure from both hunting and disease, the report said, their numbers decimated by the bush-meat trade and by the Ebola virus. The Western gorilla population has declined more than 60 percent over the past 25 years and is now considered critically endangered; during the past 15 years, roughly one-third of gorillas that died in protected areas fell prey to the lethal virus.

Between 2003 and 2005, 55 percent of the Western gorillas in the Congo Republic's Odzala National Park died of the virus.

Russell Mittermeier, who chairs IUCN's primate specialist group, noted that protected areas are not always effective -- rebels have slaughtered gorillas in a preserve that straddles the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Rwanda and Uganda -- but he defended wildlife preserves as essential.

"The world's endangered species are simply not going to survive without protected areas," said Mittermeier, who is also president of Conservation International.

Even in remote places, plants and animals are suffering from the onslaught of broader environmental forces such as climate change. Having completed its first comprehensive survey of Galapagos corals since the Red List started in the 1960s, IUCN experts identified a third of the native species as at risk of extinction. This year is the first time corals have been listed.

The group is surveying another 750 reef-building coral species in the Caribbean, the Indo-Pacific, the eastern tropical Pacific and southern Brazil, said Suzanne Livingstone, IUCN's global marine species assessment officer, who added that roughly a third of them might make it onto next year's list.

"There's probably going to be a similar trend over all corals, and that's largely because of climate change," she said.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Sep, 2007 09:55 am
Warming May Be Hurting Gray Whales' Recovery

By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, September 11, 2007; A12



As many as 118,000 gray whales roamed the Pacific before humans decimated the population through hunting, and human-induced climate change may now be depriving those that remain of the food they need, according to a study released yesterday.

The research, based on a detailed analysis of DNA taken from gray whales living in the eastern Pacific, highlights how human behavior has transformed the oceans, the scientists said.

Today there are only about 22,000 Pacific gray whales, including about 100 in the western Pacific. By examining the genetic variability of the current population, scientists at Stanford University and the University of Washington at Seattle calculated that there were between 76,000 and 118,000 gray whales in the Pacific before commercial whaling in the 1800s shrank their numbers.

Federal officials took eastern Pacific gray whales off the endangered species list in the mid-1990s, but a rise in sea temperatures appears to have limited the whales' available food. A recent spike in deaths among gray whales may suggest "this decline was due to shifting climatic conditions on Arctic feeding grounds," the researchers wrote in the paper, being published online this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

"There definitely are large-scale ecosystem effects going on," said Stanford doctoral student S. Elizabeth Alter, the lead author, in an interview yesterday.

"One of the most exciting things" about DNA analysis, she said, is that it gives us "the opportunity to look back in time and see what the ocean looked like before human impact."

The decline in gray whales has affected the ocean in a variety of ways, according to the researchers. Because the animals feed on the ocean bottom by sucking in and expelling sediment that contains shrimplike creatures called amphipods, the scientists wrote, historic populations may have redistributed enough sediment to feed a million seabirds.

Aboriginal tribes are currently allowed to kill as many as 125 eastern Pacific gray whales a year under International Whaling Commission rules, though this practice has sparked controversy. In light of the new data suggesting that the whales' numbers were more depleted than was previously known, international officials need to reconsider the amount of gray whale hunting they currently allow, the researchers said.

On Saturday, five members of Washington's Makah tribe shot and killed a gray whale without the required permit. Coast Guard officials caught the men and turned them over to tribal police. On Sunday, tribal council leaders issued a statement denouncing the men's actions and vowed to prosecute them.

Stephen R. Palumbi, a professor of marine sciences at Stanford and a co-author of the study, said the research suggests that given the right conditions, the number of gray whales could increase in the years to come. But a warmer Bering Sea could impede this recovery, he said, because it is killing off some of the food the whales consume.

When emaciated gray whales washed ashore between 1999 and 2001, scientists initially speculated that the animals were exhausting the ocean's "carrying capacity," Palumbi added, but it could be instead that global warming is to blame.

"It's not a conclusion we can come to. It's a hint," he said in an interview. But if humans are affecting the ocean's "capacity to support life, it's got to make you worry, it's got to make your wonder."
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/18/2024 at 02:52:20