0
   

Surge Succeeds

 
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Aug, 2007 04:48 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Many conservatives believe collateral damage is a necessary component of winning the war on terrorism - even when it involves killing the very people we are trying to help. This administration doesn't do civilian body counts; it's not important. They also do not allow pictures of our soldiers coming back in caskets with flags draped over them.


AUFKM???? Credibility = 0.

http://www.arcent.army.mil/cflcc_today/2003/may/images/may01_04/03_09.jpg

http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2006/03/casket.jpg

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t296/lisamiddendorf/AmericanSoldiers.jpg

Creeps like you are exactly the reason I left California. I hope you rot in that hell...
0 Replies
 
photowriters
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Aug, 2007 05:03 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Many conservatives believe collateral damage is a necessary component of winning the war on terrorism - even when it involves killing the very people we are trying to help.

That may be a characteristic of the conservatives with whom you interact, but my experience is a bit different. All of my conservative friends, and liberal for that matter, recognize that collateral damage is often unavoidable when a target is attacked, but none of them have ever said or intimated that in order to win the war on terrorism that it was necessary to have collateral damage. Often unavoidable does not equate with necessary.
0 Replies
 
photowriters
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Aug, 2007 05:08 pm
cjhsa wrote:
(various images)

I know that you want to make a strong point, but the large images make it necessary to scroll right and left to read all of the text. In the future you might want to consider editing them or chosing smaller images so that does not happen.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Aug, 2007 05:13 pm
Argh.
0 Replies
 
photowriters
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Aug, 2007 05:16 pm
cjhsa wrote:
Argh.

I didn't mean to cause you pain. It's really a fairly simple process.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Aug, 2007 05:54 pm
I have two 20" LCD monitors hooked up as an extended desktop. I see no issue. Deal with it.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Aug, 2007 07:46 pm
Typical
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Aug, 2007 08:05 pm
You mean typical like your High School graduation photo? What are you, 40?

A2K offers no way to resize an image before it is posted. Some sites do. Deal with it.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Aug, 2007 01:03 am
Jealous? That picture is less than a year old, and I'm closer to fifty. A2K won't "offer a way" to resize, but you could do it on your own. What's typical of your punkass is that you don't.
0 Replies
 
Mame
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Aug, 2007 01:11 am
cjhsa, you can download a free image resizer and be done with it.
0 Replies
 
photowriters
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Aug, 2007 06:53 am
cjhsa wrote:
I have two 20" LCD monitors hooked up as an extended desktop. I see no issue. Deal with it.

You mean typical like your High School graduation photo? What are you, 40?

A2K offers no way to resize an image before it is posted. Some sites do. Deal with it.

Thank you for your thoughtful, solution filled, courteous reply. It is always nice when you find someone who demonstrates his caring and concern by putting the needs and wellbeing of his less fortunate fellow travelers on this little blue ball ahead of his own.

Should you need any assistance with the mechanical process to convert the over sized image to one of easily viewable proportions, I am sure there are many here who will spring to your assistance if you but ask. Have a nice day! Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Aug, 2007 08:22 am
Ever notice how frequently one finds that the most vigorous flag-wavers who shout the loudest about patriotism are the ones who have never served a single day in the military?

Is anyone interested in the thread topic? I posted several links to the issue of civilian deaths in Iraq, which i suggest could reasonably be seen as a measure of just how successful this "mission" is, now that the polemicists have changed the excuse for war from womd to liberating and bringing peace, freedom and democracy to the benighted Iraqis.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 06:48 am
Perhaps because I was in the process of a cross-continent move, I entirely missed this Colin Powell quote from June 10 on Meet the Press...
Quote:
"The current strategy to deal with it, called a surge -- the military surge, our part of the surge under General Petraeus -- the only thing it can do is put a heavier lid on this boiling pot of civil war stew ... And so General Petraeus is moving ahead with his part of it, but he's the one who's been saying all along there is no military solution to this problem. The solution has to emerge from the other two legs, the Iraqi political actions and reconciliation, and building up the Iraqi security and police forces. And those two legs are not -- are not going well. That part of strategy is not going well."

Did this gain coverage in the press or other media which I simply missed through inattention? Did you other folks hear of this?
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 06:56 am
I think it got mention, albeit very minimal.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 07:36 am
blatham, Glad you posted the Colin Powell quote, because that's what I've been saying all along. Petraeus said there needed to be a political as well as a military progress to congress, but he seems to be changing his tune even though it's quite evident there isn't much progress on the diplomatic and Iraqi security forces front. It makes one wonder why so many intelligent people get sucked into the Bush Agenda.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 08:01 am
ci

Well, I think folks get "sucked in" because the people functioning in and around this administration, though pretty much entirely INcompetent in their roles as government/civil service, are extraordinarily competent in matters related to PR/propaganda and in the mechanics of acquiring power. The Iraq project or even the anti-terrorism project look to be enormous disasters BUT the related PR/propaganda projects (to frighten, to war-monger, to cajole, to avoid accountability) have been huge successes.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 08:08 am
Setanta wrote:
Ever notice how frequently one finds that the most vigorous flag-wavers who shout the loudest about patriotism are the ones who have never served a single day in the military?


No. I find the biggest flag waving patriots to be those that have served or are currently serving. That fact is conveniently ignored by the anti-war types.

As far as the thread topic, the surge is succeeding, very well, and I also hear the hunting is quite good in Afghanistan.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 08:09 am
We can blame that to the American Public and congress for allowing any/this administration to take over complete power of this country. They have run roughshod on our Constitution, Bill of Rights, the Geneva Convention, and Habeas Corpus, based on their fear-mongering.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 08:30 am
cjhsa wrote:
Setanta wrote:
Ever notice how frequently one finds that the most vigorous flag-wavers who shout the loudest about patriotism are the ones who have never served a single day in the military?
As far as the thread topic, the surge is succeeding, very well, and I also hear the hunting is quite good in Afghanistan.


Which surge is it you refer to?
Quote:
Lt-Gen Odiarno insisted: "I think it is because the Iranians are surging support to the special groups


And what's that "it"?
Quote:
Roadside bomb attacks on American troops in Iraq reached an all-time high last month, accounting for more than one third of all combat deaths.

The increase in the number of casualties caused by the explosive devices comes at the height of the "surge' of US forces which, the Pentagon claims, is broadly a success. Washington and London have blamed Iran for supplying the devices which have been used with lethal effect against American and British troops.

Although coalition forces have claimed a number of successes in discovering caches of the bombs, the number of attacks in July, stated as 99, shows the insurgency has had no problem in obtaining supplies.

In recent weeks, US forces have focused operations on Sunni militants and, in particular, al-Qa'ida.

One of the initial aims of the "surge" was to combat Shia militias which, often in collusion with government forces, have been running death squads. However, the alleged use of the roadside devices shows the threat from the Shias, with many of the groups sponsored by Tehran, has not diminished despite numerous American missions.
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article2846551.ece

And surely Afganistan is, as Ann Coulter said, "going swimmingly".

Quote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/09/world/asia/09casualties.html
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Aug, 2007 08:32 am
I saw that article in the NYTimes. Apparently they are so desperate for sources they have to cross the pond to find anyone willing to talk to them. News from folks fighting over there is "the hunting is good".
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Surge Succeeds
  3. » Page 12
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/30/2025 at 11:13:11