TTH wrote:Okay back to 9/11
4 planes hi-jacked by terrorists
1 plane was flown into one tower
1 plane was flown into the other tower
1 plane was flown into the Pentagon
1 plane went straight down in the ground
thousands were killed, fighter jets were already in the air, the order was already given to shoot down flight 93
The passengers of flight 93 were told by family members they needed to take control of the plane. Those people on that flight knew if they did not take control of the plane they would die. What the passengers didn't know was that the order was already given to shoot that plane down.
All this by 19 cavemen with box cutters
Against a World Super Power? Yeah right! We couldn't stop 'em
NIST: "We are Unable to Provide a Full Explanation of the Total Collapse"
On April 11th, 2007, family members Bill Doyle and Bob McIlvaine, scientists Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan, architect Richard Gage and the group Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice filed a petition with NIST demanding that it correct its erroneous methods and findings.
On September 27th,
NIST finally replied.
While the reply is mainly bogus, and the filers of the petition intend to appeal the decision of NIST not to correct the many fatal errors in its reports, attorney James Gourley (who drafted the petition) has pointed out one interesting statement. Specifically, NIST says in its reply:
"We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse".
Well, yes! That's exactly the point the petitioners are trying to make. No modern steel frame high-rise building has ever collapsed before or after 9/11 due to fire other than at WTC 1, 2 and 7, even though other fires have burned longer and hotter. And even if they somehow did start to collapse, the collapse would not have occurred at virtual free-fall speeds while creating enormous dust clouds right from the start.
