1
   

Me too

 
 
Reply Sun 15 Jul, 2007 07:03 pm
Mary is tired.

Me, too.


Is "Me too" correct in formal English? Is it acceptable as an answer in an exam?

Many thanks.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 640 • Replies: 16
No top replies

 
Ragman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jul, 2007 07:08 pm
'I am, too' may be better and more clearly understood.
0 Replies
 
TTH
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jul, 2007 07:49 pm
Ragman
I agree with 'I am too' is better. I don't see a need for the comma though.
0 Replies
 
Yoong Liat
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jul, 2007 09:02 pm
TTH wrote:
Ragman
I agree with 'I am too' is better. I don't see a need for the comma though.


Could another member comment on the usage of the comma? I think a comma is required.
0 Replies
 
margo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jul, 2007 09:05 pm
yes - I feel the comma is required for it to be correct.
0 Replies
 
Ragman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jul, 2007 09:12 pm
I believe the correct usage would be "I am, too" as I previously wrote.

I don't mind answering your questions at all, but I feel this would be an inadequate way to learn the language. However, it seems with your history of questions on A2K, you request more specific information than may be practical or useful (to you) from the resources of this forum.

Seeing that you have so many of these type of questions, perhaps you might want to try investing in a English grammar and style book such as Strunk and White "The Elements of Style".

The rules themselves can be listed quite easily, though much of the value of the text is not only in the rules themselves but in Strunk and White's explanations and their copious (and humorous) examples.

As a former professional writer, I have used this book as my reference standard. It is available worldwide in paperback. Here's the link about it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elements_of_Style

Also, the following books are excellent, too:

'The Elements of Style' by William Strunk Jr.
'How To Speak And Write Correctly' by Joseph Devlin, (2006),

There's also the book 'A Dictionary of Modern English Usage, often referred to as Fowler's Modern English Usage, or simply Fowler's, is a style guide to British English usage, written by Henry W. Fowler, and first published in 1926. Modern English Usage covers in detail many issues of usage and pronunciation, from plurals and literary techniques to distinctions between similar words and the usage of foreign terms.
0 Replies
 
TTH
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jul, 2007 09:42 pm
Ragman
I have to thank you for the book suggestion. I have been following along to see if you and contrex and others were going to teach the whole English language here. I don't always know when to use a comma so a book will be real helpful for me. I could use a refresher course in grammar for other reasons also.
0 Replies
 
Yoong Liat
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jul, 2007 10:01 pm
TTH wrote:
Ragman
I agree with 'I am too' is better. I don't see a need for the comma though.


I don't see a need for the comma, though. (I believe a comma is needed after 'comma'. Correct me if I'm wrong.)
0 Replies
 
Ragman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jul, 2007 10:27 pm
OK, then don't use one. It's not essential..to be correct.

I'm not sure what is going on when you ask for advice than question it.
0 Replies
 
TTH
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jul, 2007 10:30 pm
0 Replies
 
Ragman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jul, 2007 10:35 pm
Best advice I can think of is to refer to the previous grammar books books. A course on the The English language cannot be learned in such a manner (though asking multiple questions here).

I'm not sure what is going on when you ask for advice than question it. Perhaps you might want to refer to the English grammar and usage books to which I referred previously. You don't seem satisfied.
0 Replies
 
Yoong Liat
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jul, 2007 10:41 pm
I am, too
"I'm fed up." "Me, too." (Times-Chambers Essential English Dictionary)

Since it's "Me, too" (with comma), I think it should be "I am, too."
0 Replies
 
Ragman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jul, 2007 10:42 pm
Have you read the previous replies?
0 Replies
 
Yoong Liat
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jul, 2007 10:43 pm
Yoong Liat wrote:
TTH wrote:
Ragman
I agree with 'I am too' is better. I don't see a need for the comma though.


I don't see a need for the comma, though. (I believe a comma is needed after 'comma'. Correct me if I'm wrong.)


Could somebody please answer my query? Thanks.
0 Replies
 
Ragman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jul, 2007 10:43 pm
Please read the previous replies.
0 Replies
 
Roberta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 05:32 am
TTH wrote:


TTH, The tenth edition is the most up-to-date version of The Gregg Reference Manual. I checked, and the info is the same.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jul, 2007 05:51 am
Ragman, I think Yoong Liat is not speaking her own opinion here but asking about the sentence itself.

Yoong Liat wrote:
Yoong Liat wrote:
TTH wrote:
Ragman
I agree with 'I am too' is better. I don't see a need for the comma though.


I don't see a need for the comma, though. (I believe a comma is needed after 'comma'. Correct me if I'm wrong.)


Could somebody please answer my query? Thanks.


Yes, Yoong Liat, there should be a comma in the sentence "I don't see a need for the comma, though."

The sentence "Ragman I agree with 'I am too' is better" is also incorrect, in several ways. A more correct formulation would be, "I agree that 'I am too' is a better choice, Ragman."
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Me too
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/18/2024 at 05:17:59