TTH wrote:I do agree with invading Iraq. 9/11 was a direct attack on USA soil and the ones who played a role in anyway needed to be dealt with.
Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11.
You know, it's all fine when you're around your buddies, and everybody just voices the same opinion - that Iraq had to be invaded because of the role it played in the terrorist attacks.
But if you state this opinion here (which you can do, of course... freedom of expression and all that), you should be prepared to be asked about what made you arrive at this conclusion.
Of course the most likely reason is that you were mislead by your government. All the statements that came from Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice or Powell could indeed have you believe that Iraq played a role in the 9/11 attacks. However, this is not true.
And even the few conservatives here on A2K who still hold a firm belief in the war will point out that the administration never actually
lied about Iraq or about Saddam's role in 9/11, but rather that they relied on faulty intelligence or that Americans simply misunderstood what they said.
But let's have a look at the guys behind 9/11. These are the terrorists who perpetrated the attacks:
- Mohamed Atta, Egyptian
- Waleed al-Shehri, Saudi Arabian
- Wail al-Shehri, Saudi Arabian
- Abdulaziz al-Omari, Saudi Arabian
- Satam al-Suqami, Saudi Arabian
- Marwan al-Shehhi, from the United Arab Emirates
- Fayez Banihammad, from the United Arab Emirates
- Mohand al-Shehri, Saudi Arabian
- Hamza al-Ghamdi, Saudi Arabian
- Ahmed al-Ghamdi, Saudi Arabian
- Hani Hanjour, Saudi Arabian
- Khalid al-Mihdhar, Saudi Arabian
- Majed Moqed, Saudi Arabian
- Nawaf al-Hazmi, Saudi Arabian
- Salem al-Hazmi, Saudi Arabian
- Ziad Jarrah, Lebanese
- Ahmed al-Haznawi, Saudi Arabian
- Ahmed al-Nami, Saudi Arabian
- Saeed al-Ghamdi, Saudi Arabian
As you can see, quite a large number of Saudi Arabians. And as you can see, quite a small number of Iraqis.
Of course you can say that it is your opinion that the United States were attacked by Iraq, that the right to freedom of speech allows you state that, and that you will just disagree with anyone who tells you that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. I guess that translates into something like a "right to remain ignorant". Which you do have, of course.
However, as I've only been guessing about your rationale so far, let me ask you here: what made you arrive at your conclusion that Iraq played a role in the 9/11 attacks?