1

# WHAT DID YOU THINK ABOUT 9/11

Sun 11 Sep, 2011 08:44 pm
What did you think, how did you feel about this tragedy?
• Topic Stats
• Top Replies
• Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,128 • Replies: 4
No top replies

OmSigDAVID

1
Mon 12 Sep, 2011 06:52 am
@hamilton,
hamilton wrote:
What did you think,
I was a little surprized at it.
I knew that it was an act of war, requiring vengeance.

We got it.

David
0 Replies

Cosmored

0
Fri 4 Nov, 2011 10:53 am
There is a mountain of proof that the US government planned and carried out the attacks.

This is one of the pictures released by the government. It shows the tail of the craft that hit the Pentagon above the box.
http://0911.site.voila.fr/index3.htm
(top picture)

We know that the Pentagon is about 75 feet high and that a 757 is about 150 feet long. If we look at the section of the Pentagon where the plane hit in the picture at the top of that page and compare it with the space behind the box where the aircraft is, we can see that a 757 couldn't fit in that space without the nose protruding out front. The plane in the space behind the box is much too short to be a 757.

A 757 would look like this.
http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/pentagon/pentacamscam.jpg

This analysis makes it pretty clear that a 757 wouldn't fit behind the box.
http://www.bcrevolution.ca/911_part_iii.htm

I copied the picture and blew it up to a full page.
The length of the picture is 280 mm.

In the picture the height of the Pentagon at the point where it's as far from the camera as it is from the plane is 18 mm.

The space between the left side of the box and the tail of the plane is 20 mm. If we increase that by twenty percent to allow for the angle, it's 24 mm. Since a 757 is twice as tall as the Pentagon is high, a 757 would be 36 mm at that spot so the proof in the above link is valid.

Also, if you look at the fourth picture from the top on this page, you'll see the hole made by the craft.
http://www.physics911.net/missingwings

There would have been some damage from the wings of a 757. Look at the damage caused by the 767 on the side of the tower.

There's quite a difference.

Look at this picture of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon.
http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/blog/wp-content/images/pentagon1_plane.jpg

It's too pointed to be the nose of a 757.
http://www.caverca.com/Images/Boeing%20757%20TACV%2001.jpg

The photo of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon was taken with a fish-eye lens which causes some distortion but the rest of the objects in the picture are not distorted to the same degree as the nose of a 757 would have to be to have that shape. The shadow line is visible under the nose and it's consistent with the shadow of the Pentagon.

The picture is consistent with these analyses.
http://www.physics911.net/missingwings
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/ArticlesMeyer3March2006.html

Here's a blown up photo of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon.
http://www.sott.net/signs/editorials/signs20060517_NewDoctoredVideoofPentagonAttackReleaseConfirmsBoeingWasNotInvolved.php
(excerpt)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it more clear now? Can you see Flight 77 in all its glory? All we can see is an amorphous white blob that looks more like a car than the nose cone of any aircraft. Obviously the images are too grainy to be of any use to anyone. At this point then, the most we can say is that an amorphous white blob with definite Islamic terrorists leanings hit the Pentagon on 9/11.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with the person who wrote that it doesn't prove that a 757 hit the Pentagon but I disagree with his saying the photo isn't of any use to anyone. If we look at the high-resolution picture, it's obviously the nose of a fighter-type craft.
http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/blog/wp-content/images/pentagon1_plane.jpg

Look at the second picture from the top on this page.
http://insider-outsider.blogspot.com/2006/05/what-new-pentagon-crash-video-should.html

I know the scale is wrong and the 757 is too big but it gives us an idea of what we should have seen in the video released by the government considering all the cameras that surround the Pentagon.
At the 3:55 time mark of this video it's pointed out that there were lots of cameras at the Pentagon.

They must have footage of the craft hitting the Pentagon. They just don't want us to see it because we'll know it wasn't a 757.

These three articles are important.
http://www.physics911.net/omholt
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/06/why-they-didnt-use-757-to-hit-pentagon.html
http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson
(excerpt)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft — and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time during a flight, the failure would likely result in the catastrophic loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another section called plans and scheduling.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There are some good documentaries in this link.

Be sure to watch "9/11 Mysteries" and "Painful Deceptions".

This stuff below is good too. The first two deal with the "Thermite" issue which is important.
http://www.wtc7.net/articles/WhyIndeed09.pdf
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/06/why-they-didnt-use-757-to-hit-pentagon.html
(8 parts)
http://www.thepowerhour.com/911_analysis/report.htm

In this clip the representative from NIST is playing dumb about the pools of molten steel.

Here's a 6 part video about group of arquitects that think 9/11 was in inside job.

I think that those people who put forth the no-plane theory, etc are governnment disinfo agents trying to cause disruption in the 9/11 truth movement. If there are some wacko theories out there that make the official version look logical by comparison, fewer people will join the truth movement.
http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1222

http://pseudonautics.blogspot.com/2008/11/disinformation-techniques.html
(excerpt)
--------------------------------------------------------------
The best way to harm a cause is to defend it using wrong arguments.
This is why, every time there is a government conspiracy, you have a load of kooks making ridiculous claims to discredit critics by association.
Concerning 911, you have pod people, holograms, WTC nuclear devices, and directed energy weapons from space.
--------------------------------------------------------------
The guy in this video is obviously a government plant trying to discredit the truth movement by defending it with a very silly argument.

Do a YouTube search on "9/11 news disinfo" to see more.

They pulled off the 9/11 attack so they would have a pretext to invade the Middle East to get control of the oil there. This is an old story.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO301A.html

Here's some stuff about the history of US and British meddling in the Middle East.
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/2002/1000history.htm
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/history/britishindex.htm
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/irqindx.htm
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/2003/2003companiesiniraq.htm
http://www.war-times.org/pdf/Oil%20leaflet.pdf
http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/intervention/2004/1007oilprotection.htm

These two are important.

Here's some more stuff.

http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/claim.html
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2005/11/where-pentagon-was-hit.html
http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/theories.html#5
http://www.netctr.com/media.html
http://www.netctr.com/911exposed.html
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?act=idx
http://letsrollforums.com/barbara-olson-9-11-t20525.html?s=e2a93518dc17b8eef5363b11b7009f9d&

OmSigDAVID

1
Fri 4 Nov, 2011 11:34 am
@Cosmored,
U are delusional.

I am putting u on Ignore,
where u will vanish from the world of my cognition. Goodbye.

David
0 Replies

Cosmored

1
Fri 30 Dec, 2011 04:46 pm
0 Replies

### Related Topics

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, EVERYONE! - Discussion by OmSigDAVID
WIND AND WATER - Discussion by Setanta
Who ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall? - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
True version of Vlad Dracula, 15'th century - Discussion by gungasnake
ONE SMALL STEP . . . - Discussion by Setanta
Ultimate Green Leader - Discussion by gungasnake
History of Gun Control - Discussion by gungasnake

1. Forums
2. » WHAT DID YOU THINK ABOUT 9/11