Mon 11 Jan, 2016 08:41 am - You're exactly right. I do want to bring out the unreasonable side of my interlocutor. I want to hold it up high, shine lights on it, expose all its nooks and crannies, so that no one mistakes... (view)
Mon 11 Jan, 2016 08:24 am - Hard to say for sure, but this one is stuck in my mind at the moment:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZY77zDzNmYw[/youtube] (view)
Mon 11 Jan, 2016 06:28 am - Red herring fallacy. Again. And fail, again. ;)
You whined threw a tantrum, pretending that I wanted to disarm all disabled people, so you must want all disabled people to have guns. Are... (view)
Mon 11 Jan, 2016 06:05 am - Yes, I pointed out that [i]ad hom[/i] fallacy when you committed it.
Moving along, are you saying that psychotic people [i]aren't[/i] disabled? No? Well, if they're disabled, then you... (view)
Mon 11 Jan, 2016 05:57 am - So, following your example of how to "accurately represent" someone else's posts, I take that to mean "yes," that you do enjoy it when psychotic people shoot others, and... (view)
Mon 11 Jan, 2016 05:52 am - OK, let's keep playing, then. So you want to give all those disabled people guns, which includes all the genuinely psychotic loons. So you must enjoy it when the news reports that someone on a... (view)
Mon 11 Jan, 2016 05:31 am - So, once you've armed all the psychotic people, are you going to volunteer to follow them around and keep reminding them that they're not supposed to kill people? If not you, then who? (view)
