eltejano wrote:Thought I had better attribute the source of the data I quoted. Note that - something I had overlooked before - african-american churches are not included in these stats! Most of them are independent baptist, but were never affiliated with the national baptist conventions for reasons you can probably guess.
Since the county is 11.3% AA (which I thought was more like 15-20%), and the overwhelming majority go to church, that would increase the total of christians substantially - perhaps by 10%, which would put it in the mid-eighties. So , my estimate of "nearly 100%" wasn't really that far off.
Quote:*The "Unadjusted Totals" come from the 1990 and 2000 data collected by representatives of the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB).
While quite comprehensive, this data excludes most of the historically African-American denominations and some other major groups. As a result, these numbers will be an underestimate of the total adherence rate, particularly in areas with a large African-American population. The 2000 data included 149 religious groups and the final results are published in Religious Congregations and Membership in the United States 2000. Copyright © 2002, All rights reserved. The 1990 data included 132 groups and the final results are published in Churches and Church Membership in the United States 1990 Copyright © 1990, All rights reserved. Published by Glenmary Research Center, 1312 Fifth Ave., North, Nashville, TN 37208.
www.glenmary.org/grc [More information on the data collection]
***********
Hi Neologist (whatever that is

)
Starbucks? Surely you jest! We're lucky to get a decent cuppa coffe at the convenience store. Have you ever travelled down this way? Every Texas town has a Wal-Mart - uhoh - MOST texas towns have a Wal-Mart. It's an beloved institution around here.
**********
Real Life - Howdy!
Well, Gore IS a southern baptist you know - but so was Brother Bill. I wish I could get over my extreme, admittedly almost irrational, aversion to abortion - because I really do rather like those guys in every other way. I know they are supporting it only for political reasons, because their northern base demands it, but it's a difficult issue for me to cope with. It's just plain wrong - a terrible national tragedy!
Gore, however, has gotten pretty far out in left field on the environmental thing, don't you think? Maybe even a little kookie - remember that beard and all that? I don't think they'll nominate him - it's gonna be Hillary. My favorite, Joe Lieberman, isn't even running. I wish Evan Bayh from Indiana would run - I could really get behind him too.
Romney is a flip-flopper. No principles.
Jack
Gore is virtually their only hope of electing a Dem to the White House and when the convention deadlocks , they'll look at the math and turn to a proven vote-getter, and that's Algorithm.
The Dems are too smart to nominate Hilly and Billy to tagteam it again. Her negatives are way too high.
Obama is a lightweight with little experience, and southern Dems won't back him strongly.
Edwards is killing off his friends in the party (even though he'll probably win Iowa).
Gore stands a 95% chance of getting elected , if he receives the nod, IMHO. Not that I enjoy saying that.
Al used to be pro-life until he got ambitious for the national party spot. Dems don't condemn him for this 'flip-flop'. A 'lack of principle' in this area doesn't seem to be a problem for them (unless it goes the other direction).
Romney used to be pro-abortion, but has changed his view. I think pro-lifers ought to endorse that type of change. That is what we want to see , isn't it? Why would we believe that nobody could ever come to their senses and see abortion for what it is (the killing of a living human being)?