0
   

Where the religious are located

 
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:20 am
eltejano wrote:
Thought I had better attribute the source of the data I quoted. Note that - something I had overlooked before - african-american churches are not included in these stats! Most of them are independent baptist, but were never affiliated with the national baptist conventions for reasons you can probably guess.

Since the county is 11.3% AA (which I thought was more like 15-20%), and the overwhelming majority go to church, that would increase the total of christians substantially - perhaps by 10%, which would put it in the mid-eighties. So , my estimate of "nearly 100%" wasn't really that far off.

Quote:
*The "Unadjusted Totals" come from the 1990 and 2000 data collected by representatives of the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB). While quite comprehensive, this data excludes most of the historically African-American denominations and some other major groups. As a result, these numbers will be an underestimate of the total adherence rate, particularly in areas with a large African-American population. The 2000 data included 149 religious groups and the final results are published in Religious Congregations and Membership in the United States 2000. Copyright © 2002, All rights reserved. The 1990 data included 132 groups and the final results are published in Churches and Church Membership in the United States 1990 Copyright © 1990, All rights reserved. Published by Glenmary Research Center, 1312 Fifth Ave., North, Nashville, TN 37208. www.glenmary.org/grc [More information on the data collection]


***********

Hi Neologist (whatever that is Smile )

Starbucks? Surely you jest! We're lucky to get a decent cuppa coffe at the convenience store. Have you ever travelled down this way? Every Texas town has a Wal-Mart - uhoh - MOST texas towns have a Wal-Mart. It's an beloved institution around here.

**********
Real Life - Howdy!

Well, Gore IS a southern baptist you know - but so was Brother Bill. I wish I could get over my extreme, admittedly almost irrational, aversion to abortion - because I really do rather like those guys in every other way. I know they are supporting it only for political reasons, because their northern base demands it, but it's a difficult issue for me to cope with. It's just plain wrong - a terrible national tragedy!

Gore, however, has gotten pretty far out in left field on the environmental thing, don't you think? Maybe even a little kookie - remember that beard and all that? I don't think they'll nominate him - it's gonna be Hillary. My favorite, Joe Lieberman, isn't even running. I wish Evan Bayh from Indiana would run - I could really get behind him too.

Romney is a flip-flopper. No principles.

Jack


Gore is virtually their only hope of electing a Dem to the White House and when the convention deadlocks , they'll look at the math and turn to a proven vote-getter, and that's Algorithm.

The Dems are too smart to nominate Hilly and Billy to tagteam it again. Her negatives are way too high.

Obama is a lightweight with little experience, and southern Dems won't back him strongly.

Edwards is killing off his friends in the party (even though he'll probably win Iowa).

Gore stands a 95% chance of getting elected , if he receives the nod, IMHO. Not that I enjoy saying that.

Al used to be pro-life until he got ambitious for the national party spot. Dems don't condemn him for this 'flip-flop'. A 'lack of principle' in this area doesn't seem to be a problem for them (unless it goes the other direction).

Romney used to be pro-abortion, but has changed his view. I think pro-lifers ought to endorse that type of change. That is what we want to see , isn't it? Why would we believe that nobody could ever come to their senses and see abortion for what it is (the killing of a living human being)?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 10:35 am
neologist wrote:
BTW, you're gettin' up there, too, ain't ya, Set?

Or, have you forgotten?


Forgotten what?

What the Hell are you talkin' about?

Where the Hell is my coffee?
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 11:00 am
nimh wrote:
rosborne979 wrote:
In the North East areas of high population density seem to be more religious than more rural areas. Except for a few exceptions. I wonder if it's a function of how many people thay can catch to take the census (without getting shot at).

My guess: in the North East the white population isnt very religious, not in the cities but not in, say, rural Vermont, NH or Maine much either. But the cities have large Hispanic and black communities, and those are significantly more religious.


We are very religious and very liberal, in general. We are a bit of an anomaly.
0 Replies
 
eltejano
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 11:36 am
Quote:
Romney used to be pro-abortion, but has changed his view. I think pro-lifers ought to endorse that type of change. That is what we want to see , isn't it? Why would we believe that nobody could ever come to their senses and see abortion for what it is (the killing of a living human being)?


Excellent point, RL! I never thought of it that way. Thanks. Well, maybe I ought to reconsider Romney as an alternative - but I'm really tired of voting Republican. Just look at how disappointing Brother George W has been! I love him to death, as a person, and have tremendous respect for his family (I actually worked in the Houston home of his parents on a redecorating job way back in the early seventies - and I met some of their children, maybe George. His mama is one fine lady!) but, in all honesty, I am more than a little disappointed in his presidency. I think he's a decent fellow, but not too bright and clearly not qualified to be president. I don't think he listened to his daddy (I never listened to mine either) - if he had, he wouldn't be in this jam now!

FDR, Harry, Jimmy, Jack - where are your descendants? What do we have now? - Hillary! One candidate I do like, Gov Bill Richardson of NM, unfortunately doesn't stand a chance. But there is one guy out there who does understand the South and could carry Texas - Congressman Harold Ford from Tennessee. I think he could be a winner, but he chose not to run this time after losing his Senate race.

Gotta go - lunch is ready. I'll be back in the morning- probably about 3:00 AM. Since I retired, my sleep schedule is a mess - long nap in the afternoon, etc. My wife says it's "sick".

Jack
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 01:22 pm
real life wrote:
Romney used to be pro-abortion, but has changed his view. I think pro-lifers ought to endorse that type of change. That is what we want to see , isn't it?

Or maybe he didn't change his true opinion at all, but just changed his public stance on the issue (to get more votes). Are you sure you know what he believes? Do you know what any of the candidates really believe, or do you simply accept their public persona as it stands.
0 Replies
 
eltejano
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jul, 2007 03:18 pm
Quote:
....you're gonna get ripped up right regular at this site.


"Right regular..."? Are you from Texas, Setanta - or are you just a master of regional dialects? Smile

Jack
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Jul, 2007 04:30 am
eltejano wrote:
My sparsely populated East Texas county (Tyler Co., 125 miles NE of Houston) is pink on the map, yet I know that it's virtually 100% christian. If there are any atheists, wiccans or muslims around here, they keep a very low profile. If any county should be dark red, it would be this one. I am also very familiar with other heavily christian counties in central Texas that are pale yellow on the map. My theory is that the researchers did not, as someone suggested above, count the thousands of completely independent baptist and pentecostal churches in these southern counties - churches unaffiliated with any larger organization. The map seems to tilt toward areas where large, well-organized religious institutions predominate - Mormon Utah, Catholic Massachussetts, etc. [..]

For those who equate evangelical christianity with conservative politics, this county - as evangelical as any in the country - has NEVER voted republican in a presidential election. The only time it was even close was in 1984, when the dems nominated a woman VP candidate (Reagan came within a couple hundred votes of carrying the county). If you check the census data for Tyler County, TX you'll see there's a lot of poverty and a large percentage of african-americans, and economic issues override social issues for most of them. We'll see how Hillary does here.

I am a democrat too, but personally cannot, in good conscience, vote for a pro-choice candidate. Most of my baptist brethren are also democrats but manage to rationalize it somehow. They choose to vote their pocketbook instead of their Bible. [..]

Interesting stuff, Eltejano! I love it when people just kind of testify about the places they live in.. kind of like observational micro-analysis or something, from just an individual perspective.. far more interesting than the usual argumentational to and fro between cons and libs about those handful of hot button issues that dominate threads, with ever the same arguments over and again.

Also like the way in which you have a strong belief/position (on abortion), but talk about it in a self-aware way, rather than pontificating, and how you keep your good humour.. I dont agree at all with you take on the Dem primary (Al Gore!?), but wishing you a hearty welcome to this site! Hope you stick around (and keep your cool ;-)
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Jul, 2007 06:08 am
eltejano wrote:
Quote:
....you're gonna get ripped up right regular at this site.


"Right regular..."? Are you from Texas, Setanta - or are you just a master of regional dialects?

Jack


"Right regular" forms a part of the regional dialects of many parts of the country--not just Tejas . . . although it usually is associated with country boys, and usually is found south of the Ohio River, although not exclusively.
0 Replies
 
eltejano
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Jul, 2007 08:43 am
Thank you for the kind words, Nimh (that sounds vietnamese, not dutch or hungarian) Smile

********************
Setanta:

I like your signature. I have always been a Mark Twain fan and had the opportunity to visit his boyhood home in Hannibal, Mo. last May - one of the best museums I have ever seen - at least until a busload of unruly, undisciplined school children pulled-up. They ran through the place screaming like an apache war party, and their teacher made no effort whatsoever to supervise them.

We also went to St Louis and went up in the arch. The little capsule you ride in was claustrophobic, but the view was worth it. We could see the Cardinals playing ball. It was the first time I had seen the great Ohio River, that figures so prominently in american history, and it was quite an emotional experience for me. We came up the east side of the Miss from St Louis, through western KY, and crossed it at Cairo, IL at it's confluence with the Ohio. Cairo, with all its historic buildings, looked like a place that could develop a tourist industry, but it seemed to be economically dead.

We have a travel trailer and a diesel p/u to tow it with, but the price of fuel is just so outrageous that we can't travel as much as we'd like to.

Jack
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jul, 2007 02:18 pm
rosborne979 wrote:
real life wrote:
Romney used to be pro-abortion, but has changed his view. I think pro-lifers ought to endorse that type of change. That is what we want to see , isn't it?

Or maybe he didn't change his true opinion at all, but just changed his public stance on the issue (to get more votes). Are you sure you know what he believes? Do you know what any of the candidates really believe, or do you simply accept their public persona as it stands.


You may be right. Perhaps he is (in his own mind and heart) still pro-abortion.

But as long as he governs as a pro-life public official, I do not care what his private beliefs are.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jul, 2007 02:20 pm
nimh wrote:
eltejano wrote:
My sparsely populated East Texas county (Tyler Co., 125 miles NE of Houston) is pink on the map, yet I know that it's virtually 100% christian. If there are any atheists, wiccans or muslims around here, they keep a very low profile. If any county should be dark red, it would be this one. I am also very familiar with other heavily christian counties in central Texas that are pale yellow on the map. My theory is that the researchers did not, as someone suggested above, count the thousands of completely independent baptist and pentecostal churches in these southern counties - churches unaffiliated with any larger organization. The map seems to tilt toward areas where large, well-organized religious institutions predominate - Mormon Utah, Catholic Massachussetts, etc. [..]

For those who equate evangelical christianity with conservative politics, this county - as evangelical as any in the country - has NEVER voted republican in a presidential election. The only time it was even close was in 1984, when the dems nominated a woman VP candidate (Reagan came within a couple hundred votes of carrying the county). If you check the census data for Tyler County, TX you'll see there's a lot of poverty and a large percentage of african-americans, and economic issues override social issues for most of them. We'll see how Hillary does here.

I am a democrat too, but personally cannot, in good conscience, vote for a pro-choice candidate. Most of my baptist brethren are also democrats but manage to rationalize it somehow. They choose to vote their pocketbook instead of their Bible. [..]



Interesting stuff, Eltejano! I love it when people just kind of testify about the places they live in.. kind of like observational micro-analysis or something, from just an individual perspective.. far more interesting than the usual argumentational to and fro between cons and libs about those handful of hot button issues that dominate threads, with ever the same arguments over and again.

Also like the way in which you have a strong belief/position (on abortion), but talk about it in a self-aware way, rather than pontificating, and how you keep your good humour.. I dont agree at all with you take on the Dem primary (Al Gore!?), but wishing you a hearty welcome to this site! Hope you stick around (and keep your cool ;-)


Are you referring to my statements about the Dem primary/Gore and not eltejano's?

Eltejano predicted Hilly as the Dem nominee.
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jul, 2007 06:04 pm
real life wrote:
rosborne979 wrote:
real life wrote:
Romney used to be pro-abortion, but has changed his view. I think pro-lifers ought to endorse that type of change. That is what we want to see , isn't it?

Or maybe he didn't change his true opinion at all, but just changed his public stance on the issue (to get more votes). Are you sure you know what he believes? Do you know what any of the candidates really believe, or do you simply accept their public persona as it stands.


You may be right. Perhaps he is (in his own mind and heart) still pro-abortion.

But as long as he governs as a pro-life public official, I do not care what his private beliefs are.


AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
*breathe*
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

This is the most honesty you've ever shown in this forum. You lack any ability to form a solid arguement for why we should believe anything, you just want your belief validated somehow.

This is honestly your best post ever. Rex and his bible toting statue of liberty has just met its match.

T
Komedy
O
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 08:37:44