1
   

KEITH OLBERMANN: RESIGN NOW, MR. PRESIDENT!

 
 
Reply Wed 4 Jul, 2007 08:24 am
Keith Olbermann's Special Comment: You ceased to be the President of the United States
Countdown MSNBC
7/3/07

Keith Olbermann delivered arguably his most pointed and most powerful Special Comment yet on the ramifications of Bush's commutation of Libby's sentence.

In that moment, Mr. Bush, you broke that fundamental compact between yourself and the majority of this nation's citizens ?- the ones who did not cast votes for you.

In that moment, Mr. Bush, you ceased to be the President of the United States.

In that moment, Mr. Bush, you became merely the President… of a rabid and irresponsible corner of the Republican Party.

Finally tonight, as promised, a Special Comment on what is, in everything but name, George Bush's pardon of Scooter Libby.

"I didn't vote for him," an American once said, "But he's my president, and I hope he does a good job."

That ?- on this eve of the 4th of July ?- is the essence of this democracy, in seventeen words.

And that is what President Bush threw away yesterday in commuting the sentence of Lewis "Scooter" Libby.

The man who said those seventeen words ?- improbably enough ?- was the actor John Wayne.

And Wayne, an ultra-conservative, said them, when he learned of the hair's-breadth election of John F. Kennedy instead of his personal favorite, Richard Nixon in 1960.

"I didn't vote for him but he's my president, and I hope he does a good job."

The sentiment was doubtlessly expressed earlier. But there is something especially appropriate about hearing it, now, in Wayne's voice.

The crisp matter-of-fact acknowledgement that we have survived, even though for nearly two centuries now, our Commander-in-Chief has also served, simultaneously, as the head of one political party and often the scourge of all others.

We as citizens must, at some point, ignore a president's partisanship. Not that we may "prosper" as a nation, not that we may "achieve", not that we may "lead the world" ?- but merely that we may "function."

But just as essential to the seventeen words of John Wayne is an implicit trust ?- a sacred trust:That the president for whom so many did not vote, can in turn suspend his political self long enough, and for matters imperative enough, to conduct himself solely for the benefit of the entire Republic.

Our generation's willingness to state "we didn't vote for him, but he's our president, and we hope he does a good job," was tested in the crucible of history, and far earlier than most. And in circumstances more tragic and threatening.

And we did that with which history tasked us.

We enveloped "our" President in 2001.

And those who did not believe he should have been elected ?- indeed, those who did not believe he had been elected ?- willingly lowered their voices and assented to the sacred oath of non-partisanship.

And George W. Bush took our assent, and re-configured it, and honed it, and sharpened it to a razor-sharp point, and stabbed this nation in the back with it.

Were there any remaining lingering doubt otherwise, or any remaining lingering hope, it ended yesterday when Mr. Bush commuted the prison sentence of one of his own staffers.

Did so even before the appeals process was complete…

Did so without as much as a courtesy consultation with the Department of Justice…

Did so despite what James Madison -at the Constitutional Convention ?- said about impeaching any president who pardoned or sheltered those who had committed crimes "advised by" that president…

Did so without the slightest concern that even the most detached of citizens must look at the chain of events and wonder:

To what degree was Mr. Libby told: break the law however you wish ?- the President will keep you out of prison?

In that moment, Mr. Bush, you broke that fundamental compact between yourself and the majority of this nation's citizens ?- the ones who did not cast votes for you.

In that moment, Mr. Bush, you ceased to be the President of the United States.

In that moment, Mr. Bush, you became merely the President… of a rabid and irresponsible corner of the Republican Party.

And this is too important a time, sir, to have a Commander-in-Chief who puts party over nation.

This has been, of course, the gathering legacy of this Administration. Few of its decisions have escaped the stain of politics.

The extraordinary Karl Rove has spoken of "a permanent Republican majority," as if such a thing ?- or a permanent Democratic majority ?- is not antithetical to that upon which rests: our country, our history, our revolution, our freedoms.

Yet our democracy has survived shrewder men than Karl Rove.

And it has survived the frequent stain of politics upon the fabric of government.

But this administration, with ever-increasing insistence and almost theocratic zealotry, has turned that stain… into a massive oil spill.

The protection of the environment is turned over to those of one political party, who will financially benefit from the rape of the environment.

The protections of the Constitution are turned over to those of one political party, who believe those protections unnecessary and extravagant and "quaint."

The enforcement of the laws is turned over to those of one political party, who will swear beforehand that they will not enforce those laws.

The choice between war and peace is turned over to those of one political party, who stand to gain vast wealth by ensuring that there is never peace, but only war.

And now, when just one cooked book gets corrected by an honest auditor…

When just one trampling of the inherent and inviolable "fairness" of government is rejected by an impartial judge…

When just one wild-eyed partisan is stopped by the figure of blind justice…

This President decides that he, and not the law, must prevail.

I accuse you, Mr. Bush, of lying this country into war.

I accuse you of fabricating in the minds of your own people, a false implied link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11.

I accuse you of firing the generals who told you that the plans for Iraq were disastrously insufficient.

I accuse you of causing in Iraq the needless deaths of 3,586 of our brothers and sons, and sisters and daughters, and friends and neighbors.

I accuse you of subverting the Constitution, not in some misguided but sincerely-motivated struggle to combat terrorists, but instead to stifle dissent.

I accuse you of fomenting fear among your own people, of creating the very terror you claim to have fought.

I accuse you of exploiting that unreasoning fear, the natural fear of your own people who just want to live their lives in peace, as a political tool to slander your critics and libel your opponents.

I accuse you of handing part of this republic over to a Vice President who is without conscience, and letting him run roughshod over it.

And I accuse you now, Mr. Bush, of giving, through that Vice President, carte blanche to Mr. Libby, to help defame Ambassador Joseph Wilson by any means necessary, to lie to Grand Juries and Special Counsel and before a court, in order to protect the mechanisms and particulars of that defamation, with your guarantee that Libby would never see prison, and, in so doing, as Ambassador Wilson himself phrased it here last night, of you becoming an accessory to the obstruction of justice.

When President Nixon ordered the firing of the Watergate special prosecutor Archibald Cox during the infamous "Saturday Night Massacre" on October 20th, 1973, Mr. Cox initially responded tersely, and ominously:

"Whether ours shall be a government of laws and not of men, is now for Congress, and ultimately, the American people."

President Nixon did not understand how he had crystallized the issue of Watergate for the American people.

It had been about the obscure meaning behind an attempt to break in to a rival party's headquarters; and the labyrinthine effort to cover-up that break-in and the related crimes.

But in one night, Nixon transformed it.

Watergate ?- instantaneously ?- became a simpler issue: a President overruling the inexorable march of the law. Of insisting ?- in a way that resonated viscerally with millions who had not previously understood ?- that he was the law.

Not the Constitution.

Not the Congress.

Not the Courts.

Just him.

Just - Mr. Bush - as you did, yesterday.

The twists and turns of Plame-Gate, your precise and intricate lies that sent us into this bottomless pit of Iraq; your lies upon the lies to discredit Joe Wilson; your lies upon the lies upon the lies to throw the sand at the "referee" of Prosecutor Fitzgerald's analogy… these are complex and often painful to follow, and too much, perhaps, for the average citizen.

But when other citizens render a verdict against your man, Mr. Bush ?- and then you spit in the faces of those jurors and that judge and the judges who were yet to hear the appeal ?- the average citizen understands that, sir.

It's the fixed ballgame and the rigged casino and the pre-arranged lottery all rolled into one ?- and it stinks. And they know it.

Nixon's mistake, the last and most fatal of them, the firing of Archibald Cox, was enough to cost him the presidency.

And in the end, even Richard Nixon could say he could not put this nation through an impeachment.

It was far too late for it to matter then, but as the decades unfold, that single final gesture of non-partisanship, of acknowledged responsibility not to self, not to party, not to "base," but to country, echoes loudly into history.

Even Richard Nixon knew it was time to resign

Would that you could say that, Mr. Bush.

And that you could say it for Mr. Cheney.

You both crossed the Rubicon yesterday.

Which one of you chose the route, no longer matters.

Which is the ventriloquist, and which the dummy, is irrelevant.

But that you have twisted the machinery of government into nothing more than a tawdry machine of politics, is the only fact that remains relevant.

It is nearly July 4th, Mr. Bush, the commemoration of the moment we Americans decided that rather than live under a King who made up the laws, or erased them, or ignored them ?- or commuted the sentences of those rightly convicted under them ?- we would force our independence, and regain our sacred freedoms.

We of this time ?- and our leaders in Congress, of both parties ?- must now live up to those standards which echo through our history:

Pressure, negotiate, impeach ?- get you, Mr. Bush, and Mr. Cheney, two men who are now perilous to our Democracy, away from its helm.

And for you, Mr. Bush, and for Mr. Cheney, there is a lesser task.

You need merely achieve a very low threshold indeed.

Display just that iota of patriotism which Richard Nixon showed, on August 9th, 1974.

Resign.

And give us someone ?- anyone - about whom all of us might yet be able to quote John Wayne, and say, "I didn't vote for him, but he's my president, and I hope he does a good job."

Good night, and good luck.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 335 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jul, 2007 08:45 am
Almost all talking heads missed real reason for cummutation
After watching furious Keith Olbermann's comments about Bush's action, I was astonished that, for the rest of the evening, almost all of the reporters and talking heads missed the real reason Bush commuted Libby's jail sentence. It was to protect Bush and Vice President Cheney! Libby worked for Vice President Cheney, but his title is "Assistant to the President."

Bush's commutation only eliminated Libby's jail time. It didn't eliminate his conviction parole status and his ongoing appeal of the judge's decision. This means that Congress can subpoena Libby to testify, but he can invoke his 5th Amendment rights because of his ongoing appeal of his conviction.

Libby could have told prosecutor Fitzgerald the truth about Bush-Cheney-Rove roles in the Wilson-Plame retaliation and outing of a covert CIA agent. It could still happen if Libby was doing time in prison. But now, Bush has given him cover with the commutation. All of the participants just have to wait for the clock to run out and Libby's reward for his silence will be a Bush pardon the day before he leaves office.

If Bush had pardoned Libby now, Scooter would not have any protection against being forced to testify before Congress, maybe even truthfully, while Bush,Cheney, Rove are still in office---and subject to impeachment.

Shame! on the Press for prattling only about how Bush's action would effect elections, his ratings, his party, etc.

Shame! on the Press for not shouting out to the public that Bush's action continues the coverup of criminal acts.

Shame! on Bush for pretending to care about Libby and his family when he's only trying to protect himself.

SHAME!

BBB Crying or Very sad
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jul, 2007 08:49 am
He's a f*cking clueless scumbag. What else can you expect?
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jul, 2007 09:34 am
It is astonishing that the MSM either doesn't get it or is afraid to address the truth. God bless Keith Olbermann.

BTW if someone has time to find a link to the video, it would be helpful, you really have to see and hear this, the transcript does not convey the impact of this stirring indictment of a criminal administration.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jul, 2007 09:40 am
Roxxxanne
Roxxxanne wrote:
It is astonishing that the MSM either doesn't get it or is afraid to address the truth. God bless Keith Olbermann.

BTW if someone has time to find a link to the video, it would be helpful, you really have to see and hear this, the transcript does not convey the impact of this stirring indictment of a criminal administration.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/

BBB
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jul, 2007 10:19 am
Libby May Not Even Serve Probation
It was reported a couple of months ago that Bush had hired a bunch of additional lawyers for the Whitehouse. I guess they came in handy when devising his commutation action. Now taxpayers are paying for the coverup continuation. ---BBB


'NYT': Libby May Not Even Serve Probation -- Due to Possible Bush Error
By E&P Staff
Published: July 03, 2007

President Bush, in defending his decision to let "Scooter" Libby escape prison in the CIA leak cases, argued that at least he would have to serve two years of probation.

However, the federal judge who handed down the commuted 30-month sentence, pointed out Tuesday that, technically, this does not hold -- since Libby did not serve any prison time at all he does not have to face probation.

Here's how The New York Times reports it on Wednesday:

"In issuing his commutation order on Monday, Mr. Bush left intact Mr. Libby's conviction, a $250,000 fine and the two years of postprison supervised release that were ordered by Judge Reggie B. Walton of Federal District Court.

"But the details of the president's order raised procedural questions in court.

"Judge Walton said Tuesday that the law did not allow for imposing a period of supervised release on an individual who had not first completed a jail sentence. He asked the lawyers for both sides to submit briefs next week on whether Mr. Libby should have to submit to supervision by the probation office."
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jul, 2007 10:39 am
At least one journalist thinks outside the box
The Commutation is an Outrage
by Norman Pearlstine
Posted July 3, 2007

Bush's rationale might have had some merit had Libby been convicted solely of perjury. If that were the case, one might argue that he was convicted of a "process crime" and there should be leniency since there was no prosecution under the Espionage Act or the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982.

But that isn't what happened. In addition to perjury, Libby was convicted of obstruction of justice. That was the most important charge against him. Patrick Fitzgerald's summation to the jury and his sentencing recommendation made it clear that Libby's obstruction precluded him from ever determining whether his boss, Vice President Dick Cheney had broken the law and what role the White House had played in outing Plame. "There is a cloud over the vice president," Fitzgerald said in his closing argument. "That could is there because the defendant obstructed justice."

Beyond that, while some think commuting the sentence more onerous than a pardon would have been, I believe it gives Libby important cover in the civil suit that Valerie Plame has filed against him and other White House officials involved in disclosing her identity and her role at the CIA. Since Libby wasn't pardoned, his appeal of the conviction is likely to continue and until it is concluded, he can plead the Fifth Amendment and not testify in the Plame's civil trial against him.

In sum, the commutation of Libby's sentence is a cover-up, pure and simple. The trial judge's sentence may have exceeded federal guidelines by a few months. But Bush's commutation of Libby's sentence totally ignores those guidelines. If Libby deserves a pardon, shouldn't we revisit other sentences that exceed federal guidelines?
----------------------------------------

Norman Pearlstine is the author of OFF THE RECORD: The Press, the Government, and the War over Anonymous Sources. He was editor in chief of Time Inc. from 1995 through 2005 and managing editor of The Wall Street Journal, 1983-1991.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Jul, 2007 10:41 am
Good ol' Keith.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jul, 2007 05:28 am
Keith Olbermann was most effective, to me, when he was trying to be JonStewart 'lite' - being topical but sort of funny at the same time. When he started these descend-from-the-mount-and-deliver-the-word special comment pronouncements, my whole impression of him changed. He seems to me to take himself way too seriously now. "Resign now, Mr President!!" Puh-leeze.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » KEITH OLBERMANN: RESIGN NOW, MR. PRESIDENT!
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/23/2026 at 11:17:06