0
   

Britain cooks crime statistics

 
 
Reply Thu 28 Jun, 2007 07:51 am
Government figures 'missing' two million violent crimes
By David Barrett, PA Home Affairs Correspondent
Published: 26 June 2007

An extra two million violent crimes a year are committed in Britain than previously thought because of a bizarre distortion in the Government's flagship crime figures, it was claimed yesterday.

A former Home Office research expert said that across all types of crime, three million offences a year are excluded from the British Crime Survey (BCS).

The poll caps the number of times a victim can be targeted by an offender at five incidents a year.

If anyone interviewed for the survey says they have been targeted more than five times a year, the sixth incident and beyond are not included in the BCS.

The authors of a report by think-tank Civitas said the five-crimes limit is " truly bizarre" and "misleading".

Professor Graham Farrell of Loughborough University and the former acting head of the Home Office's Police Research Group, Professor Ken Pease, calculated that if the cap is ignored, the overall number of BCS crimes is more than 14 million rather than the current 11 million a year estimate.

Violent crime is 82 per cent higher at 4.4 million offences compared with 2.4 million in the BCS, the survey claims, including a 156 per cent rise in " acquaintance violence" from 817,000 incidents to 2.1 million.

Domestic violence is 140 per cent higher, up from 357,000 incidents a year to 857,000, the authors said, while there are nearly three million common assaults a year rather than the 1.5 million estimated by the BCS, a rise of 98 per cent.

Burglary is 20 per cent higher than currently estimated, at 877,000 a year, and vandalism is 24 per cent higher, the report calculated.

Robbery is 7 per cent up on the official estimates, or an extra 22,000 crimes bringing the yearly total to 333,000.

"If the people who say they suffered 10 incidents really did, it is capping the series at five that distorts the rate," the authors said.

"It is truly bizarre that the victimisation survey, based as it is on the assumption that people will by and large tell the truth about what happened to them, ... suddenly withdraws its trust in their honesty when what they are told does not chime with their own experience.

"Yet the reality is that some people are very frequently victimised, and that frequent victimisation is what they suffer rather than being an invention or exaggeration."

The cap of five crimes for repeat victims has operated ever since the inception of the BCS in 1981.

Ministers claim the survey - which now polls 40,000 people a year about their experiences of crime, is the most reliable indicator of crime levels,

The authors said: "The unwillingness to believe the facts of chronic victimisation means that crime control, police training and criminal justice action are now substantially misdirected."

In particular, the system means that the most vulnerable people in society may not be getting the police protection they require from repeat offenders, the report said.

___________________________________________________________

Laughing
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 417 • Replies: 7
No top replies

 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jun, 2007 08:28 am
So they wait until Tony Blair leaves office?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jun, 2007 09:07 am
woiyo wrote:
So they wait until Tony Blair leaves office?


You should perhaps follow the news.


--------------------------


Civitas' report published two days ago says three in every ten crimes committed in the UK are not covered by the British Crime Survey's (BCS) figures because they do not take into account more than five crimes carried out on a victim by the same offender each year.

The Home Office spokesperson pointed out that the BCS statistics showed crime had fallen by a third in the last decade.

She backed the current system as "the most reliable and robust measure of crime in England and Wales" before adding: "What is important is measuring trends consistently and applying a consistent methodology over time".
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jun, 2007 09:12 am
Btw, McG: why do you consider this to be a topic of the (USA-) politics?
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jun, 2007 10:40 am
Because I recall a rather lengthy discussion on gun crime in the UK and could not find that thread anymore. This backs up what I said regarding the UK's crime rates.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jun, 2007 10:41 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Btw, McG: why do you consider this to be a topic of the (USA-) politics?


Oh, and is this now a forum for only USA politics?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jun, 2007 10:57 am
McGentrix wrote:

Oh, and is this now a forum for only USA politics?


Since the very beginning of this side - all other politics are in internation.

Or why, do you think, those categories were created?

http://i13.tinypic.com/62h5e9g.jpg
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Jun, 2007 10:58 am
McGentrix wrote:
Because I recall a rather lengthy discussion on gun crime in the UK and could not find that thread anymore. This backs up what I said regarding the UK's crime rates.


It certainly says something about the different way to do the statistics.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Britain cooks crime statistics
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 06/14/2024 at 05:25:46