0
   

US troops 'could be in Iraq for a decade'

 
 
Zippo
 
Reply Sun 17 Jun, 2007 03:40 pm
This story is from our news.com.au network Source: AFP

US troops 'could be in Iraq for a decade'

From correspondents in Washington
June 18, 2007


US forces could be needed in Iraq for a decade to battle insurgents, the top coalition commander said overnight while vowing a "forthright" review in September on whether a troop surge is working.
Speaking on Fox News, General David Petraeus said there's broad recognition in Washington that Iraq's daunting challenges will not be resolved "in a year or even two years".


"In fact, typically, I think historically, counter-insurgency operations have gone at least nine or 10 years," he said.

President George W. Bush and other US officials have taken to invoking South Korea as an example of a protracted US presence in a country long after formal hostilities have ended.

But in Congress, Democrats agitating for an early withdrawal of US forces have fastened on Gen Petraeus's appraisal report due in September as a make-or-break moment for Mr Bush's war campaign.

A Pentagon report last week said overall levels of violence in Iraq have not gone down, even if unrest has eased in Baghdad and the long-restive province of Anbar, where the US military surge is focused.

In fresh violence overnight, assailants killed at least eight people, while a Sunni mosque south of Baghdad was bombed in the latest in a spate of tit-for-tat attacks on shrines, security officials said.

The White House has sought to diminish expectations about Petraeus's report on the impact of the deployment of 30,000 extra troops to Iraq, which reached a climax last week.

The general insisted that he would present a "forthright assessment" in September, and said early results showed a marked improvement to security in parts of Baghdad and Anbar.

Gen Petraeus stood by his rosier view after the US Senate's Democratic leader, Harry Reid, accused him last week of "not being very candid".

"The fact is that there are signs of normalcy throughout a good bit of Baghdad. There are tens of thousands of kids that will be out there tonight playing soccer," the general said.

But in any case, the surge will need longer than September to restore security throughout Iraq, he said.

"It is certainly the case that the surge by itself does not fix the problem," Ryan Crocker, the US ambassador in Baghdad, said on the NBC network.

"The surge buys time for a political process to get some legs under it," he said.

However, US critics said Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's government has failed to enact pivotal measures such as a law to distribute Iraq's oil earnings fairly, or to reconcile warring Shiite and Sunni factions.

Gen Petraeus said any long-term deployment will depend on whether Iraq's sovereign authorities want to extend the US military presence.

"And I'm not sure what the right analogy is, whether it's Korea or what have you," he said, while emphasizing that a long-term security arrangement is "probably a fairly realistic assessment".

Gen Petraeus also conceded that there were valid doubts about a new US tactic in Iraq of arming Sunni insurgents against al-Qaeda extremists, following criticism of the move by Mr Maliki.

Asked if the US-supplied weapons could later be turned on US forces or Shiite Muslims, the general said: "Well, those are legitimate concerns, and we have the same concerns."

But he said US military commanders are vetting their new local allies "as best we can" through compiling biometric data and keeping track of weapons serial numbers.

"The fact is that over time in any of these conflicts, individuals at some point have had to end up sitting across the table from those who at best tacitly were aware of what was going on against their adversary and perhaps aided and abetted it," Gen Petraeus said.

In comments published yesterday by Newsweek magazine, Mr Maliki warned that the new US tactic is "dangerous because this will create new militias".

"I believe that the coalition forces do not know the backgrounds of the (Sunni) tribes. It is a job of the (Iraqi) government," he said.

Mr Crocker said Mr Maliki had ordered the formation of a new committee to evaluate "what we are dealing with before we move too far down the road".

The Australian
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 361 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jun, 2007 04:20 pm
Actually, Petraeus know before he took on the job that nothing would be resolved in a "few months" or after this summer. That he told congress he would be "up front" whether good news or bad news, he forgot to share this little gem about the impossibility to fix the problem in Iraq with only 21,500 more troops which should have been obvious. Can he still be trusted? I'm not so sure.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Jun, 2007 04:24 pm
Residents emerge after Baghdad lockdown


By HAMZA HENDAWI, Associated Press Writer
41 minutes ago



BAGHDAD - Residents emerged from their homes Sunday at the end of a four-day lockdown and found themselves caught in traffic spawned by hundreds of new police and army checkpoints.

Many wondered if the extra security and the curfew imposed after last week's bombing of a major Shiite shrine had only created inconvenience and delayed an inevitable explosion of revenge attacks.

"The militias will still take revenge, today or tomorrow," said agricultural materials merchant Nasser Ali Jaber, a 56-year-old Shiite father of three.

The bombing of the Askariya shrine north of Baghdad was the second there in 16 months. The first, which destroyed the glistening golden dome, unleashed a torrent of Shiite-Sunni violence that continues to this day.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » US troops 'could be in Iraq for a decade'
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 06/30/2024 at 08:53:56