Reply Sun 17 Jun, 2007 01:29 pm
the united states military seems to be going through its arsenal of generals at a fast pace .
one has to wonder if any generals will be able to survive the iraq war - is that why an admiral has now been selected to take command in iraq ?

Head of US military 'forced out'

The US military's outgoing top commander, Gen Peter Pace, says he opposed the decision to replace him at the end of his first term.
Gen Pace said he did not resign voluntarily as he felt this would be "unacceptable" for him as a leader. "I've been told I'm done," he said.

His term as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is to end in October.

Washington said last week it would not seek another term to avoid a "divisive" confirmation process in Congress.

The Bush administration has faced several challenges on Iraq in recent months from Congress, which is now controlled by the Democrats.

Gen Pace has been involved in all the controversial decisions surrounding the US military presence in Iraq and Afghanistan.

He is regarded as a close ally of former Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who resigned last year amid criticism of his handling of the Iraq war.

Senate criticism

Gen Pace told an audience at the Joint Forces Staff College in Norfolk, Virginia, that he felt resigning during a war would be a betrayal of his troops.

"One thing that was discussed was whether or not I should just voluntarily retire and take the issue off the table," he said.

But, he said, he rejected this because he did not want anyone under his command to "think - ever - that his chairman, whoever that person is, could have stayed in the battle and voluntarily walked off the battlefield."

US Defence Secretary Robert Gates last week said he had intended to seek another two-year term for Gen Pace but chose to avoid a "a backward-looking and very contentious process".

He recommended Adm Michael Mullen, the current chief of naval operations, as his replacement.

He said Adm Mullen had the "vision, strategic insight and integrity to lead America's armed forces".

On Thursday, Democrat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid took the unusual step of openly criticising Gen Pace.

Senator Reid said he had told Gen Pace "he had not done a very good job of speaking out for some obvious things that weren't going right in Iraq".

Story from BBC NEWS:

Published: 2007/06/15 23:55:10 GMT


source :

defence secretary gates said : "... Adm Mullen had the "vision, strategic insight and integrity to lead America's armed forces".
so what will the defence secretary say about general pace - perhaps he'll say : " he did NOT have vision, strategic insight and integrity to lead America's armed forces" ?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 470 • Replies: 0
No top replies


Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
  1. Forums
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/07/2022 at 03:36:22