1
   

Spielberg Endorses Hillary

 
 
Reply Wed 13 Jun, 2007 12:21 pm
please stay tuned for anti semitic and hillary sucks comments from the usual suspects.... Laughing

http://www.hillaryhub.com/
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 593 • Replies: 16
No top replies

 
CoastalRat
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Jun, 2007 01:49 pm
Hillary sucks.

(Just so you're not disappointed BPB)
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Jun, 2007 01:55 pm
I think she sucks too, and I'm anything but a usual suspect.

One more time, for the people in the back...HILLARY CLINTON WILL NEVER BE PRESIDENT.
0 Replies
 
CoastalRat
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Jun, 2007 02:00 pm
Seriously though, I couldn't care less who Spielberg (or any other celebrity) endorses, especially when he starts out saying "I've taken the time to familiarize myself with the impressive field of Democratic candidates..."

Seems to me if he wants to be taken seriously he should familiarize himself with all the candidates be they democrat, republican, libertarian or whatever. But that's just me.

And in case anyone missed it earlier, Hillary sucks. Cool
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Jun, 2007 02:03 pm
I take no stock in celebrities hawking either medical or political preferences. Spielberg has one vote.....................so do I!
0 Replies
 
CoastalRat
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Jun, 2007 02:11 pm
Amen Phoenix. Anyone who votes for someone simply because some celeb is voting for them is an idiot. Sadly, many people will and all politicians like getting those celebrity endorsements. Personally, I'd rather trust my instincts when voting rather than some ego-filled celebrity who thinks they are more knowledgable because they are famous.

Oh yeah, and Hillary sucks. (I think I already said that, but just in case I didn't)
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Jun, 2007 02:13 pm
Hillary sucks (still, any Democrat is better than any Republican).
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Jun, 2007 02:13 pm
Spielberg's movies suck. Hillary munches rugs.
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Jun, 2007 04:41 pm
It's Geffen vs Spielberg now.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Jun, 2007 05:00 pm
ebrown_p wrote:
Hillary sucks (still, any Democrat is better than any Republican).


Lincoln was a republican.
Are all the dems better then him?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Jun, 2007 05:02 pm
CoastalRat wrote:
Seriously though, I couldn't care less who Spielberg (or any other celebrity) endorses, especially when he starts out saying "I've taken the time to familiarize myself with the impressive field of Democratic candidates..."

Seems to me if he wants to be taken seriously he should familiarize himself with all the candidates be they democrat, republican, libertarian or whatever. But that's just me.

And in case anyone missed it earlier, Hillary sucks. Cool


it's a given that the republican candidates all suck and are not worthy of even a mention. Hillary Clinton is the next president. live with it.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Jun, 2007 05:02 pm
Even you aren't so dense as to think Lincoln equates to the field of GOP candidates today. Aren't you?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Jun, 2007 05:02 pm
mysteryman wrote:
ebrown_p wrote:
Hillary sucks (still, any Democrat is better than any Republican).


Lincoln was a republican.
Are all the dems better then him?


yes.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Jun, 2007 05:04 pm
snood wrote:
Even you aren't so dense as to think Lincoln equates to the field of GOP candidates today. Aren't you?


I quoted ebrown word for word.
There was no qualifier as to anything.

ebrown said...
Hillary sucks (still, ANY Democrat is better than ANY Republican).

Where is the qualifier there?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Jun, 2007 05:10 pm
mysteryman wrote:
snood wrote:
Even you aren't so dense as to think Lincoln equates to the field of GOP candidates today. Aren't you?


I quoted ebrown word for word.
There was no qualifier as to anything.

ebrown said...
Hillary sucks (still, ANY Democrat is better than ANY Republican).

Where is the qualifier there?


qualifier..... that's a big word....
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Jun, 2007 05:10 pm
mysteryman wrote:
snood wrote:
Even you aren't so dense as to think Lincoln equates to the field of GOP candidates today. Aren't you?


I quoted ebrown word for word.
There was no qualifier as to anything.

ebrown said...
Hillary sucks (still, ANY Democrat is better than ANY Republican).

Where is the qualifier there?


The sentence is written in present tense-- and Republicans back then were a completely different party than modern Republicans are today (how many Republicans back then would have fought to keep the Confederate flag flying over statehouses).

That being said... I probably wouldn't have liked Lincoln much had I been alive in that time. His attitude toward slavery (by my not to deep understanding) was much like Hillary's attitude on the war and other important issues.

I would have been a fervent abolitionist and wanted the president to have comitted to strong, immediate action to end slavery.

And, I have sometimes wondered if fighting the civil war was a mistake (for the North).
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Jun, 2007 05:11 pm
Is this fact supposed to mean anything?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Spielberg Endorses Hillary
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 06/29/2025 at 09:35:29