1
   

Obama's Plan For Universal Health Care Coverage

 
 
Miller
 
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 03:58 am
May 29, 2007
Obama calls for universal health care coverage, paid for by government, business, consumers

IOWA CITY, Iowa (AP) _ Seeking to add heft to his presidential bid, Democrat Barack Obama is offering a sweeping plan that would require every American to have health coverage and calls on government, businesses and consumers to share the costs of the program.

Obama said putting in place universal health coverage has been debated for decades, but the time has finally come to act. He said his plan could save the average consumer $2,500 a year and bring health care to all.

"The time has come for universal, affordable health care in America," Obama said in remarks prepared for delivery at the unveiling of his plan Tuesday in Iowa City.

A copy of his remarks and documents describing the program were obtained by The Associated Press.

Under Obama's proposal, every American would be required to carry health insurance, and the Illinois senator would create a National Health Insurance Exchange to monitor insurance companies in offering the coverage. In essence, Obama's plan retains the private insurance system but injects additional money into the system to pay for the expanded coverage.

Those who can't afford coverage would get a subsidy on a sliding scale depending on their income, and virtually all businesses would have to share in the cost of coverage for their workers. The plan that would be offered would be similar to the one covering members of Congress.

His package would prohibit insurance companies from refusing coverage because of pre-existing conditions.

"My plan begins by covering every American. If you already have health insurance, the only thing that will change for you under this plan is that the amount of money you will spend on premiums will be less," Obama said. "If you are one of 45 million Americans who don't have health insurance, you will after this plan becomes law."

In addition to broadening coverage, Obama called for a series of steps to overhaul the current health care system. He would spend more money boosting technology in the health industry such as electronic record-keeping, put in place better management for chronic diseases and create a reinsurance pool for catastrophic illnesses to take the burden of their costs off of other premium payers.

His plan also envisions savings from ending the expensive care for the uninsured when they get sick. That care now is often provided at emergency rooms. The plan also would put a heavy focus on preventing disease through lifestyle changes.

In all, Obama said, the typical consumer would save $2,500 a year.

Obama conceded that the overall cost of the program would be high, while not providing a specific number.

"To help pay for this, we will ask all but the smallest businesses who don't make a meaningful contribution to the health coverage of their workers to do so to support this plan," said Obama. "And we also will repeal the temporary Bush tax cut for the wealthiest taxpayers."

Unveiling the proposal marks a crucial step for Obama. Serving in his first term as a senator, Obama often is criticized as not having the experience to be a serious candidate for the party's nomination.

Some also see him as offering more style than substance, and he's clearly hoping that spelling out a detailed plan to offer health care for all will deflect those criticisms. Polls also have shown that voters rank health care as among their top concerns.

Obama says that's the message he's getting on the campaign trail virtually everywhere he goes. He said the current system that's left 45 million people _ including 9 million children _ without health insurance goes against the nation's basic instincts.

"That is not who we are. We are not a country that rewards hard work and perseverance with bankruptcies and foreclosures," said Obama. "We are not a country that allows major challenges to go unsolved and unaddressed while our people suffer needlessly."

Obama said he would seek to use his presidential campaign as a vehicle to build momentum for changes in the health care system, allowing him to break a gridlock that's lasted since Harry Truman was president.

"In the richest nation on Earth, it is simply not right that the skyrocketing profits of the drug and insurance industries are paid for by the skyrocketing premiums that come from the pockets of the American people," he said.

Obama said several states already had taken up health care initiatives on their own. These states would be allowed to retain programs they've crafted, as long as they meet the minimum standards he proposes.

"Every year candidates offer up detailed plans with great fanfare, only to see them crushed under the weight of Washington politics and drug and insurance industry lobbying once the campaign is over," said Obama. "Well, this cannot be one of those years."

AP
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,274 • Replies: 25
No top replies

 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 04:00 am
Quote:
Obama conceded that the overall cost of the program would be high, while not providing a specific number.


Will this be Obama's "little secret"?
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 06:28 am
I have noticed you have quite a few threads of Obama and respond in threads with obama as the subject. Do you have something terrible against him or what? Just wondering out of idle curiosity.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 06:41 am
revel wrote:
I have noticed you have quite a few threads of Obama and respond in threads with obama as the subject. Do you have something terrible against him or what? Just wondering out of idle curiosity.


You find no fault with the many threads praising Obama and claiming he is the greatest thing to come upon the American scene since apple pie. However when someone expresses a negative thought about him. It's what do you have against Obama.
True Obama can deliver a speech. But does he have the ability to deliver? Talk after all is cheap.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 06:43 am
au, can you find all these threads, please?

I have one that I started more than a year ago. The rest tend to be started by Miller or someone else, and are critical of Obama. They may become positive after a while, but they didn't start that way.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 06:52 am
Quick sweep of Politics:

"Obama placed under Secret Service protection," started by fishin, neutral.

"The Problem with Obama's Mantra," started by Miller, critical.

"Obama's Plan For Universal Health Care Coverage," started by Miller, critical (as per her comment about the "secret.")

"Obama '08?," started by me, positive.

"The Obama Message: Empowering?," started by Miller, critical.

"Hillary Pulls Ahead of Obama in Poll," started by Miller, critical.

"Obama's Silence on Imus Alarms Some Blacks," started by Miller, critical.

"Obama goes rude on Rudy," started by Miller, critical.

"Keep Guns from the insane: Obama," started by Miller, critical.

"Obama Not ready for Prime Time," started by Miller, critical.

"Obama Is Bush League!" started by Miller, critical.

"Obama Says Imus Should Be Fired," started by Miller, critical.

"Obama Supports Iraq War Funding," started by Miller, critical.

"Obama's Israel support questioned, started by Zippo, critical.

"Rift between Obama and Rev. J. Wright, Jr?," started by Miller, critical.

"Our First Muslim President?," started by Miller, critical.



That's the first 10 pages of the Politics forum. I searched for the word "Obama," caught the last one because it was right under the "rift" one.

I'd say revel has a point.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 07:06 am
sozobe

Sorry, I should have said responses.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 07:14 am
sozobe
In my opinion Obama is like a baseball player who wants to go fron "A" ball to the majors based upon what he says.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 08:21 am
"Obama calls for universal health care coverage, paid for by government, business, consumers "

Huh? And this is a "brilliant" idea?

Where does GOVT get their money? TAXPAYERS

Where does business offset their expenses? TAXPAYERS (lower taxes due to increased expense of medical benefit)/CONSUMERS

So the cost will be increased taxes and expenses on the part of the Consumer/Taxpayer.

So how does this plan really lead to affordable healthcare?
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 08:31 am
woiyo
If we can find money to fund a futile wars, foreign aid and all the pork that congress doles out. We should be able to find money to support a system of universal health care. Our tax dollar should be used in support of the citizens needs first and foremost.
0 Replies
 
username
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 08:43 am
Countries with single-payer health coverage (i.e. government plans, as in every major industrial nation but us) pay a lower percentage of GDP for that coverage and by just about every major public health metric have healthier citizens than we do. With our private "insurance", 15-20% are uncovered, administrative costs are much higher because those private companies reap huge profits (which of course have to be paid for by the companies/individuals who buy those plans), and some third world countries' citizens have better health statistics than the US does. There have been several threads on this already.

It's time and past time that the US did something to fix it. The system is broken. More power to Obama for proposing something. But get it right, Barack. Don't wimp out and try to create another public-private mashup.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 08:52 am
au1929 wrote:
woiyo
If we can find money to fund a futile wars, foreign aid and all the pork that congress doles out. We should be able to find money to support a system of universal health care. Our tax dollar should be used in support of the citizens needs first and foremost.


I agree, but that is not implied in Obamas plan.

Does Obama have any idea exactly HOW and WHO will pay for this? Citing GOVT, BUSINESS and TAXPAYERS is not the answer and objective person would put out.

So I would suspect this is just more hot air from some polician who will say anything to get elected.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 09:07 am
You remember the commercial. Promice them anything but give them Arpege. It comes to mind whenever a politician makes a promise. That is the credo that politicians operate under.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 11:03 am
revel wrote:
Just wondering out of idle curiosity.


As is your right on A2K and as is my right as a 5th generation American.

Cool
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 11:07 am
Quote:
some third world countries' citizens have better health statistics than the US does.


As for example Cuba, where there is a greater than 30% abortion rate, but a low infant mortality rate...

Yeah! It's all in the numbers...

Cool
0 Replies
 
username
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 11:10 am
Instead of rather irrelevant comments, Miller, do take a look at some of the relevant public health statistics. We don't do very well. We pay the most and we get the least overall of any first world country.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 11:23 am
username wrote:
Instead of rather irrelevant comments, Miller, do take a look at some of the relevant public health statistics. We don't do very well. We pay the most and we get the least overall of any first world country.


But you stay in the US, don't you?

Cool
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 11:28 am
Miller wrote:
username wrote:
Instead of rather irrelevant comments, Miller, do take a look at some of the relevant public health statistics. We don't do very well. We pay the most and we get the least overall of any first world country.


But you stay in the US, don't you?

Cool


Which relevant health stats?

The ones about how the quality of our general health caree system is world class or the one that talk about how much it costs?
0 Replies
 
username
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 12:14 pm
Both. World class (it's not,based on outcomes). Most expensive (it is).
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 12:45 pm
username wrote:
Both. World class (it's not,based on outcomes). Most expensive (it is).


Where are your statistics? You keep blabbing about it. PROVE IT!

I am curious!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama's Plan For Universal Health Care Coverage
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 05/18/2024 at 10:35:33