Reply
Fri 25 May, 2007 11:54 am
Hearing Sought Over Linguists' Discharge
By Lolita C. Baldor
The Associated Press
Wednesday 23 May 2007
Washington - Lawmakers who say the military has kicked out 58 Arabic language experts because they were gay want the Pentagon to explain how it can afford to let the valuable specialists go.
Seizing on the latest discharge, involving three specialists, House members wrote the House Armed Services Committee chairman on Wednesday that the continued loss of such "capable, highly skilled Arabic linguists continues to compromise our national security during time of war."
Former Navy Petty Officer 2nd Class Stephen Benjamin said his supervisor tried to keep him on the job and urged him to sign a statement saying he was not gay. Benjamin said his lawyer advised against signing because the statement could be used against him later if other evidence surfaced.
In an interview with The Associated Press, Benjamin said he was caught improperly using the military's secret level computer system to send messages to his roommate, who was serving in Iraq. In those messages, he said, he may have referred to being gay or going on a date.
"I'd always had been out since the day I started working there," Benjamin said. "We had conversations about being gay in the military and what it was like. There were no issues with unit cohesion. I never caused divisiveness or ever experienced slurs," said Benjamin, who was in the Navy for nearly four years.
He was fired under the "don't ask, don't tell" law passed in 1994. It lets gays serve if they keep their sexual orientation private and do not engage in homosexual acts. The law prohibits commanders from asking about a person's sex life and requires discharge of those who openly acknowledge they are gay.
Rep. Marty Meehan, who has sought a repeal, organized the letter to Rep. Ike Skelton, D-Mo., asking the committee hold a hearing about the Arabic linguists.
"At a time when our military is stretched to the limit and our cultural knowledge of the Middle East is dangerously deficient, I just can't believe that kicking out able, competent Arabic linguists is making our country any safer," Meehan said.
The letter, signed by about 40 House members, says that the military has discharged 58 Arabic linguists under the policy and that Congress should decide whether "don't ask, don't tell" "is serving the nation well."
For Benjamin, 23, the discharge ended a military career he had hoped to continue.
He said he was among about 70 people investigated at Fort Gordon in Georgia for using the computer to send personal notes. He said others who are not gay kept their jobs even though they were caught sending sexual and profane messages.
Benjamin said investigators from the Defense Department's inspector general's office pulled the message logs for one day and reviewed them for violations. Some people, he said, received administrative punishments for writing dirty jokes, profanity and explicit sexual references.
According to researchers at the California-based Michael D. Palm Center, which tracks these issues, three Arabic linguists were fired as a result of the computer reviews. Their names were not released. Benjamin agreed to discuss the incident publicly.
The center's director, Aaron Belkin, said, "There is simply no common sense reason for the military to fire Arabic linguists in the midst of a dire shortage of translators. Translating al-Qaida cables is more important the making sure that the military is free of gays."
Marine Maj. Stewart Upton, a Pentagon spokesman, said the Pentagon is enforcing the law.
The Defense Department, he said, "must ensure that the standards for enlistment and appointment of members of the armed forces reflect the policies set forth by Congress," he said.
Benjamin said the computer review was done last December, but his discharge was not finalized until the end of March. His roommate, he said, was allowed to finish out his tour in Iraq and came home in February, then was discharged in early April.
"I was always discreet, I never considered it would be an issue," said Benjamin, when asked why he joined the military knowing the policy existed. "I thought if I don't say anything, they're not going to ask me. But, it was more aggressive than I thought."
Meehan's bill to repeal the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" law has 124 co-sponsors, but efforts to get Congress to take another look at the issue have not yet been successful.
Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said he was not reviewing the policy.
Quote:He was fired under the "don't ask, don't tell" law passed in 1994. It lets gays serve if they keep their sexual orientation private and do not engage in homosexual acts.
As I see the terms of this law spelled out here, only thirteen years after it was passed, it strikes me how ridiculously archaic and unreasonable it is. I had pretty much forgotten about it, but reading this, it literally jumped off the page at me.
How absolutely ridiculous to even think that one could require celibacy as a condition of employment (unless from a priest/nun/monastic).
This law was never particularly enforceable in all practicality, and it seemed a ridiculous sham to pass it-even at the time it was passed in 1994-but it definitely should have gone by the wayside by now.
Are we still this unenlightened? Do other countries have anything resembling this as a requirement for serving in their military forces? Is this even an issue in other countries?
I'm really, really trying not to make a joke about "cunning linguists"...
Yeah, "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" was dumb. I always hoped that it was just on the way to something else, but the something else never materialized. Let gay people serve. Geesh.
This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard of.
Cycloptichorn
[homophobia]
Who need 58 Arabic translators anyway.......what if they all got together and talked about boys they liked and stared at my ass in the shower. I'd much rather be killed by a terrorist because there weren't enough translators to translate the information.
[/homophobia]
Kind of like illegal immigration. Why have a law if you are not going to enforce it, yet if it is a law, it should be enforced.
Ask your lawmakers, you know, the ones that want to investigate the issue, why they they haven't changed the law if they are going to investigate it's enforcement.
McGentrix wrote:Kind of like illegal immigration. Why have a law if you are not going to enforce it, yet if it is a law, it should be enforced.
Ask your lawmakers, you know, the ones that want to investigate the issue, why they they haven't changed the law if they are going to investigate it's enforcement.
"Don't ask, Don't tell" isn't a LAW. It's military policy, the congress has very little input this matter I'm sure.