1
   

Veteran Intelligence officers calling for Cheney's removal?

 
 
Reply Wed 16 Jul, 2003 06:32 pm
I received this today from a friend with credible connections to the Intelligence Community. The most amazing news is the revolt by intelligence veterans against VP Richard Cheney. Will Rumsfeld be next?
-----BumbleBeeBoogie

"Jaw dropping, wow. It seems like everyday there's some amazing development.

Yesterday, it was Bush's startingly false statement made before a joint press conference with Kofi Annan, that the US's primary reason for going to Iraq was, "We gave him a chance to allow the inspectors in, and he wouldn't let them in".

Today, it is a letter crafted a few days ago by intelligence veterans
calling for Cheney's removal.

Dig slightly deep into the history of the Vietnam Conflict (or just read the new and great SECRETS by Dan Ellsberg) and recall the Rand letter submitted shortly before the Pentagon Papers were released.

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/07/16/vips/index.html

This, plus reports of plummeting troop morale due mostly to high officials reneging promised rotatations.

And then there's North Korea of course. Contrary to the assurtions of high officials earlier in the year, it is doubtful that we could simultaneously successfully fight a sustained campaign with North Korea and occupy Iraq....apparently, we don't have available boots for necessary troop rotation in the mideast as it is.

I'm 35 and too old for the draft....hallelujah.

...and just in, Senate Repulicans have derailed any sort of road map
whatsoever in regards to Iraq. Preferring, it seems, to go entirely
unprepared with eyes shut and ears closed...

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=584&ncid=584&e=2&u=/nm/20030716/pl_nm/iraq_usa_congress_dc
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=108&session=1&vote=00283

("motion to table" is essentially putting the matter into a circular file)
Party line, including moderates like Hagel, McCain and Lugar."
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 568 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 Jul, 2003 06:43 pm
Rumsfeld's personal spy ring
Rumsfeld's personal spy ring
By Eric Boehlert - Salon.com
(This is only the lead into the full article---BBB)

The defense secretary couldn't count on the CIA or the State Department to provide a pretext for war in Iraq. So he created a new agency that would tell him what he wanted to hear.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
July 16, 2003 | During last fall's feverish ramp up to war with Iraq, the Pentagon created an unusual in-house shop to monitor Saddam Hussein's links with terrorists and his allegedly sprawling arsenal of weapons of mass destruction. With direct access to Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's office and the White House, the influential group helped lay out, both to administration officials and to the press, an array of chilling, almost too-good-to-be-true examples of why Saddam posed an immediate threat to America.

Six months later, with controversy mounting over the administration's handling of war intelligence, the small, secretive cell inside the Pentagon is drawing closer scrutiny and may soon be the subject of a congressional inquiry to determine whether it manipulated and politicized key intelligence and botched planning for post-war Iraq.

"The concern is they were in the cherry-picking business," says U.S. Rep. Ellen Tauscher, D-Calif., a member of the House Armed Services Committee. "Cherry-picking half-truths and rumors and only highlighting pieces of information that bolstered the administration's case for war."

The Pentagon's innocuously named Office of Special Plans served as a unique, hand-picked group of hawkish defense officials who worked outside regular intelligence channels. According to the Department of Defense, the group was first created in the aftermath of Sept. 11 to supplement the war on terrorism; it was designed to sift through all the intelligence on terrorist activity, and to focus particularly on various al-Qaida links. By last fall it was focusing almost exclusively on Iraq, and often leaking doomsday findings about Saddam's regime. Those controversial conclusions are now fueling the suspicion the obscure agency, propelled by ideology, manipulated key findings in order to fit the White House's desire to wage war with Iraq.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Veteran Intelligence officers calling for Cheney's removal?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 05/06/2024 at 01:58:15