0
   

Blair, a Bush Poodle or a Briton?

 
 
Reply Sat 12 Jul, 2003 07:34 pm
Tony Blair will, to put it mildly, be an honoured guest when he arrives as the guest of George Bush in Washington this week. The Prime Minister has been invited to address a joint session of Congress, and is to be awarded a Congressional Gold Medal. No other Briton has been so doubly honoured during his or her lifetime.
And yet Blair seems reluctant, even now, to challenge his hosts forcefully on an issue where international law is simply being trampled - at the expense of British citizens. In the circumstances, it will be extraordinary if Blair fails to speak out strongly on this issue.

Blair's role is especially important because of the widespread indifference on this subject in the United States. The announcement last week that six terrorist suspects are eligible for trial by military commissions may have seemed a bombshell in Britain, not least because two of the six are British citizens. In the United States, by contrast, the announcement barely registered as a blip on the radar screen.

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/foreignaffairs/comment/0,11538,997413,00.html

A motion signed by 218 MPs, including the former cabinet ministers Robin Cook and Clare Short, has called on the Government to arrange for all the British suspects to be repatriated and tried in Britain.

Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, has also told his American counterpart, Colin Powell, that the men should be handed over to the British authorities. However, the proceedings at the US military base are controlled by Mr Powell's rival, the US Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,032 • Replies: 11
No top replies

 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jul, 2003 07:44 pm
And Rummy is, of course, a law unto himself.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jul, 2003 07:57 pm
Hmmm - I wonder if it be less "poodle-dom" - because that is a rather unfair epithet for Blair who, whatever one may think of him, is an accomplished politician and leader in his own right - than difficulty in cavilling at one part of the "Bush" edifice, when one has committed oneself so fully and, as it turns out, politically perilously, to the rest of it? We cling, I think, when we have committed so fully.

Also, I wonder if Blair will discuss any concerns privately, while demonstrating unity publicly?

My PM is similarly supporting the treatment of the Australian caught up in this mess - (going so far as to declare his guilt!) - while many other voices in the country are expressing deep concern at the behaviour of the American government. Again, I suspect, he is so committed that it is hard to voice any cavils.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jul, 2003 08:03 pm
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,992467,00.html

Yep, this is getting a LOT of press in England. The 6 that King George II announced would face a secret Military tribunal are given a choice...confess to the crimes and get 20 years in prison or if found Guilty by what has the appearances of a Kangaroo court with Rumsfeld able to remove and appoint judges at will, or be executed.

Even U.S.'s National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is backing away from it, stating that the concern was that lawyers could be "lending their legitimacy to what would otherwise be a sham proceeding."


http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/13/politics/13TRIB.html?ex=1058673600&en=c125d5d377517456&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jul, 2003 08:05 pm
Lawyers associated with the cases have had a lot of airplay here, as they voice their horror at the processes involved.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jul, 2003 08:14 pm
and the response in the US----------------------------------------?
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jul, 2003 08:18 pm
We're waiting for Rush Limburger to tell us what to think about it. Wink
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jul, 2003 10:37 pm
Don't forget John Howard. He's got a number of poodles.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jul, 2003 07:58 am
The fallout from the death of government scientist Dr David Kelly, fatally embroiled in a row over the case for going to war in Iraq, has proved disastrous for Blair and provoked the worst crisis of his six-year premiership.
The latest opinion poll in the Daily Telegraph showed that 61 per cent of voters felt the Labour government seemed to have lost control and was at the mercy of events.
Sixty-eight percent said there was a culture of deceit and spin at the heart of government, a damning condemnation of Blair's communications chief Alastair Campbell, his right-hand man who has been dubbed Britain's real deputy prime minister.
Nearly half of those canvassed for the poll said they could not believe a word Blair said as questions kept mounting over why Britain went to war in Iraq.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jul, 2003 10:32 am
LONDON -- Speculation was rampant yesterday that one of Tony Blair's closest advisers was about to resign, as the Prime Minister's credibility rating plummeted.

Sixty-eight per cent of people in a newspaper poll said there was a culture of deceit and spin at the heart of government.
It is a damning condemnation of Mr Blair's communications chief, Alastair Campbell, his right-hand man who has been dubbed Britain's real deputy prime minister.

The BBC's chief political correspondent, Andrew Marr, reported yesterday that Mr Campbell would be gone by the northern winter at the latest.

There was an immediate denial from Downing St, which rubbished the reports as "wishful thinking".
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Jul, 2003 10:36 am
Alastair Campbell has agreed with Tony Blair that he will leave Downing Street, according to government insiders.
The prime minister's communications chief is unlikely to quit before the Hutton inquiry into David Kelly's apparent suicide has reported, delaying his departure until the autumn at the earliest.
The row over the Kelly affair could re-ignite on Tuesday, when a Commons inquiry might reconsider its decision not to publish evidence from the BBC journalist at the heart of the dispute with the government.
Many members of the foreign affairs committee are unhappy that media reports of undisclosed evidence backing the BBC's case appeared yesterday, after they had agreed on compassionate grounds not to publish a transcript of evidence taken from Andrew Gilligan.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Jul, 2003 11:46 am
Someone needs to do something about Blair's unruly hair -- a poodle cut would do just fine.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Blair, a Bush Poodle or a Briton?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 12:30:22