1
   

9/11 Physicist Contacted To Appear On The View

 
 
Reply Thu 5 Apr, 2007 05:38 pm
Agreement tentatively made for Steven Jones to discuss towers, WTC 7 collapse

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Thursday, April 5, 2007


Physicist Professor Steven Jones has confirmed that Rosie O'Donnell's staff have contacted him regarding a potential future appearance on The View to discuss the improbable collapse of the twin towers and WTC 7.

During a debate on The View, O'Donnell promised to feature a physicist as a guest on the show to discuss the physical evidence and the impossibility of jet fuel melting steel.

"A person from Rosie's team contacted me by E mail," Professor Jones told the Alex Jones Show, "so I wrote back to them and said I would be glad to appear and I named two other physicists who I trust who could also appear."

The Internet leader in activist media - Prison Planet.tv. Thousands of special reports, videos, MP3's, interviews, conferences, speeches, events, documentary films, books and more - all for just 15 cents a day! Click here to subscribe! Find out the true story behind government sponsored terror, 7/7, Gladio and 9/11, get Terror Storm!

Jones said that Rosie's representatives need to get "permission" from ABC before the segment can be scheduled so the appearance is still tentative, but it is something that we might see when O'Donnell returns from vacation in around 10 days.

There are a couple of other potential developments that will strike a blow for 9/11 truth but we cannot reveal their exact nature so as to not compromise the chance of them actually unfolding.

One thing we can say for sure is that this entire story is not going away anytime soon.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2007/050407physicistcontacted.htm
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 627 • Replies: 18
No top replies

 
Green Witch
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Apr, 2007 05:55 pm
I look at the disaster in Iraq and the sad mess known as the Bush agenda and I can't believe that administration had anything to do with 9/11. The plot that took down the World Trade was so deviously clever and so smoothly executed that there is no way in hell the Bushies could have pulled it off. If the Bush gang had tried to execute such a plan all the planes would have ended up smashing into each other over Newark, and Bush would have declared war on New Jersey.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Apr, 2007 06:16 pm
Green Witch, you could be right. At least if Steve Jones gets on the View America will hear some scientific evidence we can evaluate. He could make a fool of himself and the 911 Truthers. Or he could make sense. Hopefully some scientists from the government will be there too. Millions of Americans have legit questions and maybe we'll get some answers. It's only right that we have a national examination of the science involved in the collapse of the WTC.
0 Replies
 
paull
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Apr, 2007 07:11 pm
Thank god Rosie will be there to ask thought provoking questions that focus on relevant issues.

OH, I thought you meant Rosie PEREZ.
0 Replies
 
happycat
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Apr, 2007 07:18 pm
Green Witch wrote:
I look at the disaster in Iraq and the sad mess known as the Bush agenda and I can't believe that administration had anything to do with 9/11. The plot that took down the World Trade was so deviously clever and so smoothly executed that there is no way in hell the Bushies could have pulled it off. If the Bush gang had tried to execute such a plan all the planes would have ended up smashing into each other over Newark, and Bush would have declared war on New Jersey.


LMAO!! You're not kidding!! Laughing
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Apr, 2007 04:53 am
Veddy interesting. Especially if this physicist actually appears on the show and is allowed to voice his opinions. This will be (even though it could still be shrugged off as a tabloid-type forum) a step toward legitimately airing differing perspectives about what really went down that day...
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Apr, 2007 05:13 am
The same thing goes on in a blacksmiths forge using coal. You can get metal cherry red and itll sag under its own weight.
Steve Jones is a complete douche with very little cred. HE was also involved in the "cold fusion" fiasco of the late 1980's.
I heard that ole Rosie said that "This is the first time where fire has been known to melt steel" What a moron.

Besides the ineptness factor of the Bush administration, the data is pretty convincing to real engineers. Some wag from a University recreated a fire that was fed by fuel oil and building materials and he had the fire contained in a vortex dingus where the wind could set up a bellows -like arrangement. He had some mild steel bars in the fire bay and they all sagged after about an hour. These things can be tested in labs and yet the 9-11 guys are STILL fronting these lies.(YES LIES)

I was dubious from the start when the 9-11 scientists actually faked the seismic records from Columbia U's Lamont observatory. The 9-11 guys sort of deferred to one of their geophysics fellow conspiracy nuts , and then --TA DAAA, no more do we hear of the seismic record being used.
When I catch one piece of evidence being faked, I worry about the whole pile of "evidence " we are being asked to believe.

These guys take for granted that most people have neither the time nor training to conduct independent inquiries , and they count on people just buying this crap wholesale without question.

The mere fact that Steve Jopnes is a previously exposed hoaxer should be enough to raise eyebrows, rather than saying that "Now we can have both sides of the story"

Rosie is just an old d-bag who wants to adopt a different persona, and she has no clue as to what shes even talking about. They oughta stick an apple in her mouth
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Apr, 2007 07:19 am
Quote:
he had the fire contained in a vortex dingus where the wind could set up a bellows -like arrangement. He had some mild steel bars in the fire bay and they all sagged after about an hour.


There it is. Proof that the ancient chinese cause the collapse of the towers. They invented the bellows.


Now if we could just figure out who invented the "dingus" we could wrap this conspiracy up in a nice big bow.
0 Replies
 
Zippo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Apr, 2007 02:12 pm
The bottom line is that the government was caught lying abut Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. Nothing else the government says or ever has said, from the legality of taxes to the history of WW2 to who killed JFK, JFK Jr., RFK, Martin Luther King, Marilyn Monroe, to the attack on the USS Liberty, to 9-11 can be accepted at face value. Prudence demands that all official versions of events be assumed as fraudulent as Saddam's 'nookular' bombs.

The US Government faces a serious credibility crisis and they have no one to blame but themselves.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Apr, 2007 02:23 pm
Good statement Zippo. Add operation northwoods to the list.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Apr, 2007 02:38 pm
This is a 2 hour radio interview. Professor Steven Jones & William Rodriguez

Professor William Rodriguez and Steven Jones join Alex Jones to discuss Rosie O'Donnell's brave stance for 9/11 truth and the latest evidence to suggest an inside job. http://www.prisonplanet.com/index.html Anyone interested scroll down the page and it's easy to find. Steven Jones has the goods no doubt about it and the credentials too. The other guy William Rodriguez is considered the last surviver of 911. His story is incredible. The Bushies best not allow the View to have this show. There are so many other aspects that would be covered in other shows. Pilots, firemen, police, workers, eyewitnesses the 911 Commission swept aside. And the audience on the View is begging for answers big time. Rosie has had her life threatened on tv by rabid Bushies. But the fat lady is singing like a canary.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Apr, 2007 02:57 pm
The American spirit is still alive (or being reborn) and again it's purpose is to take on our F#@KED up government. I'm very proud to be in the trenches armed with the truth. Win or lose...truth and justice is the only way to go.

Now let's go slap soome sleepwalkers around!
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Apr, 2007 03:15 pm
With all the outrage and death threats against Rosie I went looking for the show on youtube that opened this pandora's box. I was surprised to find that Rosie didn't really start this whole thing. Pandora turned out to be the dumb Bushie blonde on the show who got snotty and asked Rosie about 911 conspiracy theorists. Unlike so many other "anti-Bushie" spokespeople on tv Rosie didn't fumble or stumble. She jumped on the question of WTC 7 collapsing despite not getting hit by a plane or any huge fires. I dare the government's scientist who came up with the government's theories to face Steven Jones face to face on tv before the Views very large audience. His science is easily refuted and Jones is just the guy to do it. Jones makes his science easy enough for us all to understand. Plus it's fun for all ages like watching Mr. Wizard.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Apr, 2007 06:00 am
From Wikipedia, a series of observations by Dr Langmuir , who coined the term "Pathological Science"
Quote:
Pathological science, as defined by Langmuir, is a psychological process in which a scientist, originally conforming to the scientific method, unconsciously veers from that method, and begins a pathological process of wishful data interpretation (see the Observer-expectancy effect cognitive bias). Some criteria for pathological science are:[3]

The maximum effect that is observed is produced by a causative agent of barely detectable intensity, and the magnitude of the effect is substantially independent of the intensity of the cause.
The effect is of a magnitude that remains close to the limit of detectability, or many measurements are necessary because of the very low statistical significance of the results.
There are claims of great accuracy.
Fantastic theories contrary to experience are suggested.
Criticisms are met by ad hoc excuses.
The ratio of supporters to critics rises and then falls gradually to oblivion.
Langmuir never intended the term to be rigorously defined, it was simply the title of his talk on some examples of "weird science". As with any attempt to define the scientific endeavor, examples and counterexamples can always be found
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Apr, 2007 07:42 am
farmerman, you have described the government's 911 theories. Unplausable "weird science".
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Apr, 2007 08:04 am
Zippo wrote:
The bottom line is that the government was caught lying abut Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. Nothing else the government says or ever has said, from the legality of taxes to the history of WW2 to who killed JFK, JFK Jr., RFK, Martin Luther King, Marilyn Monroe, to the attack on the USS Liberty, to 9-11 can be accepted at face value. Prudence demands that all official versions of events be assumed as fraudulent as Saddam's 'nookular' bombs.

The US Government faces a serious credibility crisis and they have no one to blame but themselves.

No, actually, the US government was not caught lying about Iraqi WMD, although it was wrong about some things.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Apr, 2007 10:46 am
Brandon9000 wrote:
Zippo wrote:
The bottom line is that the government was caught lying abut Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. Nothing else the government says or ever has said, from the legality of taxes to the history of WW2 to who killed JFK, JFK Jr., RFK, Martin Luther King, Marilyn Monroe, to the attack on the USS Liberty, to 9-11 can be accepted at face value. Prudence demands that all official versions of events be assumed as fraudulent as Saddam's 'nookular' bombs.

The US Government faces a serious credibility crisis and they have no one to blame but themselves.

No, actually, the US government was not caught lying about Iraqi WMD, although it was wrong about some things.


Sure, they were caught lying. They didn't say "we're pretty sure" that Iraq has WMD, they said 'we know for sure.' That was a lie. There was no dispositive evidence in their possession which showed that Iraq had WMD for sure, none. When they failed to inform people - and many members of congress - of the evidence which contradicted their stated objective of going to war in Iraq to get WMD, when they pretended surety when there was no real surety amongst the intelligence analysts, they were lying. Straight up.

Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Apr, 2007 01:59 pm
9/11 Truth Movement: Only Growing Stronger - And the Media are Frightened to Death!

TV News Lies
Friday, April 6, 2007

The corporate media have launched desperate attempt to eliminate all discussions about the official body of evidence related to the events of 9/11. Just watch how they are trying frantically to get Rosie O'Donnell fired from ABC's The View. Also think back to when the media launched a broad based attack against the character of Charlie Sheen for daring to publicly question the official story of 9/11. Rosie, however, is a much greater problem for the criminals in the media. She is on a daily network TV program with a large audience that doesn't even know that questions and disturbing facts about 9/11 exist.

Let's understand one thing: the 9/11 truth movement is doing nothing but growing. People who have been exposed to the actual evidence and understand the ramifications of what it reveals are not waking up one morning and suddenly deciding that they believe the official story. The dynamic works like this: those who are not aware of the evidence believe the official story. Once they start poking around they realize that the official story about the attacks could not possibly be true, and they discover the plethora of evidence hidden and misrepresented by the Bush administration, the 9/11 Commission and the corporate media. 9/11 truthers are not suddenly coming across new information that caused them to suddenly believe the official story. It's a one way flow. The evidence speaks for itself.
more
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Apr, 2007 05:40 am
Quote:
Let?s understand one thing: the 9/11 truth movement is doing nothing but growing. People who have been exposed to the actual evidence and understand the ramifications of what it reveals are not waking up one morning and suddenly deciding that they believe the official story.


Thats merely a testament as to the gullibility of many people. All of these people who believe the conspiracy theory have no idea what constitutes evidence. While real forensic data and pictures are on the web , they were archived by the investigation teams, this doesnt matter to the conspiracists who pass around "campfire" tales that are ALL rehashed versions of just a few "Uberconspireacy theorists" What do we know about some of the data that the conspiracists deny

1The Seismic data they tout has been faked. This is verified by the veru scioentists whose job it was to maintain the seismographs. They had presented papers at the Academy of Forensic Sciences about how the Steve Jones crowd had expanded the timelines and added "peaks" ontothe records

2The cut beams that are always shown as "proof" that they were slioced by cutter charges are also a product of an addled brain. The cut beams were actually removed by rescuers during the first days of the rescue attempts. The reason these are post WTC collapse features is that all the metal drips are lying all over rubble. If the beams were "cutter charged" first, the rubble would be lying atop the metal .

3The building didnt fall faster than gravity . That entire argment is specious. The rubble ejecta that everyone could see in the news films was falling at exactly the same velocity as the building.

4Then we come to the airplanes. The damage inflicted on the buildings is clearly visible in the news fotos. Also the huge amounts of rubble and secondary fires on WT7 were visible throughout the day.

5 The conspiracists have made a very good second income by expanding the plot onto America. Theyve used the collective paranoia of our nation to make us believe that an otherwise incompetent administartion is actually quite devious and criminally complicit in our worst act of terror since Pearl Harbor

Physical evidence of such a conspiiracy is based upon the rules of Pathological SCience and not reason. Noone in the conspiracy ranks is willing to objectively observe and analyze data. Those of you on this board are only capable of collecting links and posting them , when you dont realize is that most of the material in those links has been rehashed and found wanting by credible scientists . Its just an example of "You can fool some of the people all of the time" Do some analysis of your own. As far as the "9/11 for Truth " movement growing, all that tells me is that there are some real morons out there who are being herded about by a few cynical types who are using the whole event to enrich themselves.Thats the only 9/11' truth' that matters.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » 9/11 Physicist Contacted To Appear On The View
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/06/2024 at 05:27:16