Baldimo
 
Reply Tue 27 Mar, 2007 07:34 am
If this were the # of crimes still waiting to have people sent to jail you can bet your sweet ass that more people would speak up. Since it applies to illegal immigrants it isn't an issue.

Quote:
WASHINGTON - Teams assigned to make sure foreigners facing departure orders actually leave United States have a backlog of more than 600,000 cases and cannot accurately account for the fugitives' whereabouts, the government reported.
The report by the Homeland Security Department's inspector general found that the effectiveness of teams assigned to find the fugitives was hampered by "insufficient detention capacity, limitations of an immigration database and inadequate working space."
Even though more than $204 million was allocated for 52 fugitive operations teams since 2003, a backlog of 623,292 cases existed as of August 2006, the report said.
The number of illegal immigrants in the United States has been estimated at between 11.5 million and 12 million. About 5.4 percent of them are believed to be "fugitive aliens," those who have not obeyed orders to leave the country.
The inspector general found there is too little bed space available to detain such fugitives, and agents are hampered by an inaccurate database. Another factor that limits the teams' effectiveness is insufficient staffing, the report said.

Until the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, attempts to catch such fugitives were carried out mostly by teams not exclusively devoted to the task. After the attacks, an Absconder Apprehension Initiative was created within the Justice Department to find, catch and deport such immigrants. When the Homeland Security Department was created in March 2003, it assumed responsibility.
Plans for the new office stated that it aimed to eliminate the case backlog by the end of 2012, although a field manual put the timetable at 2009, the report said.
Yet "despite the efforts of the teams, the backlog of fugitive alien cases has increased each fiscal year since the program was established in February 2002," the inspector general said.
The report said the weekly field office reports sent to headquarters do not accurately reflect what the teams have done. Sometimes they include apprehensions made by other federal, state or local enforcement agencies. The reports might also include cases closed because of an immigrant's death, voluntary departure or change to legal status.
"The current reporting system does not provide a means by which managers can assess teams' performance," the inspector general concluded. That makes it impossible to determine if the teams are meeting their goals, the report said.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 988 • Replies: 10
No top replies

 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Mar, 2007 07:45 am
Just think what we could have done with the $300 billion squandered in Iraq?

Thank God our president has a plan and the initiative to find the money to fix the problems. More tax cuts should solve this problem real quick.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Mar, 2007 07:54 am
parados wrote:
Just think what we could have done with the $300 billion squandered in Iraq?

Thank God our president has a plan and the initiative to find the money to fix the problems. More tax cuts should solve this problem real quick.


This thread isn't about Iraq, so please leave the Iraq debate out of this thread. Thank you.

Got anything else to say relative to this article?
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Mar, 2007 08:40 am
Why isn't it about Iraq? Your article talks about 9/11. Laughing
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Mar, 2007 09:34 am
parados wrote:
Why isn't it about Iraq? Your article talks about 9/11. Laughing
Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Mar, 2007 09:54 am
Point parados.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Mar, 2007 10:30 am
ebrown_p wrote:
Point parados.


As you and others have pointed out, Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 so there for it doesn't need to be brought up.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Mar, 2007 10:58 am
Your initial point is, of course, silly.

You could reduce instances of crime by the same amount by kicking 12 million of the people who are in interracial marriages out of the country.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Mar, 2007 11:16 am
ebrown_p wrote:
Your initial point is, of course, silly.

You could reduce instances of crime by the same amount by kicking 12 million of the people who are in interracial marriages out of the country.


Interracial marriage isn't against the law, being here illegally is.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Mar, 2007 11:42 am
That's the point Baldi.

Interracial marriage was illegal, but then we made people in interracial marriages legal.

That doesn't affect the fact that 12 million people in interracial marriages are still responsible for hundreds of thousands of crimes and a number of drunk driving deaths.

This seems completely irrelevant to the question of whether people in interracial marriages should be considered illegal or not.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2007 07:23 am
ebrown_p wrote:
That's the point Baldi.

Interracial marriage was illegal, but then we made people in interracial marriages legal.

That doesn't affect the fact that 12 million people in interracial marriages are still responsible for hundreds of thousands of crimes and a number of drunk driving deaths.

This seems completely irrelevant to the question of whether people in interracial marriages should be considered illegal or not.


Your trying to blur the line again brown. This story was about the back log of cases involving illegal immigrants that should have been deported. I know you can't face the fact that a group of people you support are activly breaking the law and have been ordered to leave have not left or can't be found.

The reason I posted this was simple. If we had car thiefs or drug dealers where there were 623,292 cases were people hadn't been sent to jail there would be a **** storm in the media.

What this has to do with interracial marriage is beyond me. If you want to use the race card then use it some where else. Save it for the homosexual marriage thread, where it at least has some bearing on the issue.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » 623,292
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.22 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 10:48:21