FreeDuck wrote: Brandon9000 wrote:
What you're really saying is that there is no such thing as a really awful dictator who we ought to try to keep from having WMD. I may not be able to give an air tight definition of "really awful," but that doesn't mean that such a thing doesn't exist, or that an intelligent person can't recognize it. For example, I'm glad that Hitler didn't have nuclear weapons. Despite the lack of a perfect definition of "really awful," as it applies in this context, there is no doubt in my mind that he would qualify. You're giving me the old liberal falsehood that because I can't define evil precisely, I can't respond to it in the world.
I am sometimes stunned by your ability to be completely illogical.
How interesting that you don't actually challenge any of my points specifically. The use of adjectives does not constitute support for your viewpoint. If, in fact, my argument above is illogical, tell me exactly how.