1
   

Hillary Clinton Endorses Gay Adoption, Quietly

 
 
Miller
 
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2007 06:58 am
Hillary Clinton Endorses Gay Adoption, Quietly
By Mike Bates
Mar 7, 2007

Struggling with Senator Barack Obama for black votes, Hillary Clinton acquitted herself well in Selma the other day. That Southern drawl she's suddenly developed assures her a job with any future revival of "Hee Haw" if her presidential ambitions are quashed. Not so widely covered by the mainstream media was a speech Senator Clinton delivered two days earlier. She spoke before 400 members of the Human Rights Campaign, which boasts it's the nation's largest gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender civil rights organization. Hillary was gushing with enthusiasm for the HRC: "I love the fact it's my initials, have you ever noticed that?"

She's proud to stand with the Human Rights Campaign, she told them. Apparently not, however, proud enough to publicize her address to the group. The Associated Press reported that when she was asked Monday why she didn't advertise the speech, as is usually done, Mrs. Clinton responded, "You'll have to ask my campaign."

The liberal double standard is wondrous to behold. George W. Bush is directly responsible for the misdeeds of any soldier anywhere in the world. Yet when one of their own is challenged, liberals immediately shift into full Sergeant Schultz "I know nothing . . . nothing!" mode. This, despite the fact that Hillary's campaign isn't quite as large as the U.S. military. Although it may spend more. Private detectives can be so very expensive.

The Human Rights Campaign posted a video of Hillary's talk on YouTube.com. She began by congratulating the organization for the fabulous job it did in giving the country Speaker Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Reid. They saved the Republic from a fate worse than death, two more years of GOP control of Congress.

She extended kudos for helping to defeat last year's Federal Marriage Amendment, which would have (close your eyes here, children) defined marriage as the union of a man and a woman.

The proposal, said Hillary, was wedge politics at its worst. It runs against the entire forward movement of American history. Moreover, it was mean spirited.

Both HRC the person and HRC the organization routinely charge that something, or somebody, is mean spirited. In 2003, a Human Rights Campaign spokesperson termed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) "a mean spirited attack on gay families." The bill denied Federal acknowledgment of same-sex marriages and permitted states to not recognize same-sex marriages licensed in other states.

In her speech, Mrs. Clinton didn't mention DOMA, possibly because it was signed by Mr. Clinton when he was president. The senator has subsequently voiced her support for the law. Looking now to keep an important constituency happy, Hillary's changing her story.

Former Clinton advisor Dick Morris has written that the Clintons' interest in DOMA came after polling data suggested strong public approval. Her support, she claims, wasn't based on that. Rather, it was a clever plan to derail a constitutional amendment that would have banned gay marriages. Sure, I believe that.

The senator detailed for the HRC crowd her opposition to her husband's failed "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, her backing of legislation prohibiting employment discrimination and her hatred of hate crimes.

Then she said something I haven't heard her say on TV: "We're going to make sure that nothing stands in the way of loving couples, gay or straight, who want to adopt children." Gay adoption is the new front. The battle against civil unions or gay marriages has pretty well been decided. It's no longer a question of if; the remaining questions are when and how the laws will be structured.

Still, many Americans - a majority according to some polls - oppose gay adoption. For Mrs. Clinton to have so softly expressed her support for gay adoption suggests she knows her endorsement could prove risky, at least in a general election. Courting gay activists is essential for any Democratic candidate and the senator ended her talk by speaking of those she believes need a voice:

"The boy who is afraid to walk down the hallway at school. The devoted partner barred from the hospital bedside of the woman she loves. And all those who still go about their daily lives in silence, unable to acknowledge who they are and who they love. "For more than 25 years you at the Human Rights Campaign have been their voice and I am proud to stand by your side. I want you to know that just as you always have an open door to my Senate office, you will always have an open door to the White House."

After seeing how she's tried keeping her speech and its support for gay adoption under the radar, you have to wonder whether or not it'll be the front door that's always open.

This Michael Bates column appears in the March 8, 2007 Reporter Newspapers.

http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_272611986.shtml
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 636 • Replies: 16
No top replies

 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2007 11:21 am
Oh gosh. Everyone knows that being bounced around the foster care system for years and being put out on the street on your 18th birthday with no place to call home is SO much better than being raised by icky gay people who love you with all their heart.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2007 11:55 am
boomerang wrote:
Oh gosh. Everyone knows that being bounced around the foster care system for years and being put out on the street on your 18th birthday with no place to call home is SO much better than being raised by icky gay people who love you with all their heart.


Apparently, the Catholic Church doesn't think so. Sad
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2007 12:42 pm
Hillery will be for anything that gets hew a vote.

She stands for nothing!
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2007 12:51 pm
I agree with woiyo.

Hillary can't even bring herself to say whether homosexuality itself is immoral or not. She doesn't deserve the votes of either side.
0 Replies
 
Green Witch
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2007 01:01 pm
Hillary's sort of half-assed, but will they love me in the morning stance on the some big issues makes me nuts. She has actually done some very good things here as a senator in NY, but her inability to make a strong, loud statement on the sensitive issues is pitiful. She is forever trying to figure out which way the wind is blowing, and in the process loses far more than she gains.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2007 01:52 pm
woiyo wrote:
Hillery will be for anything that gets hew a vote.

She stands for nothing!


She tells the Public, she's for troop withdrawal from Iraq, except NOT ALL THE TROOPS.

I wonder what her position will be on abortion.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2007 01:58 pm
Hillary makes strage bedfellows.
0 Replies
 
Green Witch
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2007 02:03 pm
Miller wrote:
woiyo wrote:
Hillery will be for anything that gets hew a vote.

She stands for nothing!


She tells the Public, she's for troop withdrawal from Iraq, except NOT ALL THE TROOPS.

I wonder what her position will be on abortion.


Actually, she has been fairly straight forward on that as pro-choice. I assume she is not going to change her mind. Based on some of the health issues she has supported it would be hard for her to do a flip on it.

(You know Miller, I can't stand looking at your avatar so I'm going to have avoid your threads for awhile)
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2007 03:07 pm
This is Katherine Heigl since Kate Walsh's photo wouldn't fit.
Cool
0 Replies
 
AziMythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2007 03:23 pm
Love should be taxed.

Then it would be legal, regulated and certified,
and the quality and safety of love would be higher.

Fewer people would be hurt by love
and the government could share in our successes.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Mar, 2007 05:57 am
Green Witch wrote:
Hillary's sort of half-assed, but will they love me in the morning stance on the some big issues makes me nuts. She has actually done some very good things here as a senator in NY, but her inability to make a strong, loud statement on the sensitive issues is pitiful. She is forever trying to figure out which way the wind is blowing, and in the process loses far more than she gains.


Like what? Name 5 bills she actually SPONSORED that impacted the residents of NY State.

She was way behind Shumer in attacking Homeland Defense for increase in funding.

She is a carpet bagger who would not know the difference between Hyde Park and New Hyde Park.
0 Replies
 
Green Witch
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Mar, 2007 07:25 am
(Thanks Miller, you look much better as medical care professional, even if it's only one that's played on TV)

Woiyo, I would have to do to much Googling to get more specific than what I know- so here's what I know: She has successfully worked for better health care for children with the Children's Health Insurance Program. It's not a perfect program, but it's been a good start to help children and low income women get some basic health care and affordable prescription drugs. She's championed the cause of cleaning up environmental hazards in and around schools (something that effects my area directly). We have had some direct clean-ups of toxic sites because of her legislation.

She has also been very instrumental in the Prevention First Act that aims to educate young people about preventing unwanted pregnancy and STDs - and it's more than abstinence. She also successfully battled the Bush administration concerning "Plan B" so that emergency contraceptive is now available to women who want it.

Most of her success has been in areas of health care for the poor and environmental clean up- an area that the Bush administration has been medieval about.

I think she's a wimp when it comes to the war in Iraq, and even her current push for veteran benefits has a lot to do with showmanship, I think she goes where the wind on blows on some of the big issue. However, here in my little town she has made a difference.

I know she is a polarizing figure and I actually wish she wouldn't run for Pres., I think we need to start anew in this country with a fresh face and fresh perspective.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Mar, 2007 07:32 am
Green Witch wrote:
(Thanks Miller, you look much better as medical care professional, even if it's only one that's played on TV)

Woiyo, I would have to do to much Googling to get more specific than what I know- so here's what I know: She has successfully worked for better health care for children with the Children's Health Insurance Program. It's not a perfect program, but it's been a good start to help children and low income women get some basic health care and affordable prescription drugs. She's championed the cause of cleaning up environmental hazards in and around schools (something that effects my area directly). We have had some direct clean-ups of toxic sites because of her legislation.

She has also been very instrumental in the Prevention First Act that aims to educate young people about preventing unwanted pregnancy and STDs - and it's more than abstinence. She also successfully battled the Bush administration concerning "Plan B" so that emergency contraceptive is now available to women who want it.

Most of her success has been in areas of health care for the poor and environmental clean up- an area that the Bush administration has been medieval about.

I think she's a wimp when it comes to the war in Iraq, and even her current push for veteran benefits has a lot to do with showmanship, I think she goes where the wind on blows on some of the big issue. However, here in my little town she has made a difference.

I know she is a polarizing figure and I actually wish she wouldn't run for Pres., I think we need to start anew in this country with a fresh face and fresh perspective.


She has done nothing you state.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Mar, 2007 07:48 am
NYS has a disfunctional government from top to bottom. Career criminals.

Regarding Hillary, I am no supporter of hers. She is far too concerned about her future instead of NYS's present. It has been that way from day one. She has done some stuff for NYC, but upstate generally gets nothing but the tax bill.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Mar, 2007 08:46 am
Quote:
(Thanks Miller, you look much better as medical care professional,


I've always looked good in my long white lab coat and by golly I've done it in REAL-LIFE, not on TV!
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Mar, 2007 08:47 am
Quote:
Love should be taxed


Have you read the tax codes recently?

Shocked
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Hillary Clinton Endorses Gay Adoption, Quietly
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 01:09:20