2
   

World court: Serbia cleared of genocide, but not innocent

 
 
nimh
 
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2007 02:35 pm
Two news reports on the same story, with strikingly contrasting headlines, and a difference in emphasis within the story itself:

---------------------------------------------

Quote:
Court clears Serbia of genocide

BBC News
26 February 2007

Short version:

Quote:
The UN's highest court has cleared Serbia of direct responsibility for genocide during the 1990s Bosnian war. But the International Court of Justice did rule that Belgrade had violated international law by failing to prevent the 1995 massacre at Srebrenica.

The case is the first of a state being charged with genocide. Bosnia brought the case and would have sought billions of dollars from Serbia in compensation if successful. The case began a year ago and a panel of judges has been deliberating since hearings ended in May 2006.

Bosnia argued that Belgrade incited ethnic hatred, armed Bosnian Serbs and was an active participant in the killings. Belgrade said the conflict was an internal war between Bosnia's ethnic groups and denied any state role in genocide.

In the ruling, the president of the court, Judge Rosalyn Higgins, said: "The court finds that the acts of genocide at Srebrenica cannot be attributed to the respondent's (Serbia) state organs."

However the court added that the leaders of Serbia failed to comply with its international obligation to prevent the killings and punish hose responsible.

The war crimes tribunal in The Hague has already found individuals guilty of genocide in Bosnia and established the Srebrenica massacre as genocide.


---------------------------------------------

Quote:
Court: Serbia Failed to Prevent Genocide

Associated Press
February 26, 2007

Short version:

Quote:
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 2 • Views: 1,118 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Mar, 2007 02:36 pm
In ISN Security Watch, meanwhile, Anes Alic summarised the findings of the International Court of Justice and argued that its ruling constitutes "another move to appease Belgrade ahead of the Kosovo status announcement".

Quote:
Serbia wins, for the greater good

Commentary by Anes Alic for ISN Security Watch (27/02/07)

Serbia breaks out the champagne in The Hague after the ICJ clears it of genocide in Bosnia in another move to appease Belgrade ahead of the Kosovo status announcement.

[O]n Monday [..] the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague [..] announce[d] the verdict on the case, filed in 1993, in which Bosnia accused Serbia of arming, financing and encouraging Bosnian Serbs to conduct an ethnic cleansing campaign against Bosnian Muslims and Croats. [..]

The ICJ [..] cleared Serbia of responsibility for the genocide of Bosnian Muslims and Croats. And those lesser crimes for which Serbia was found guilty will have no legal consequences.

[It was] a verdict that had already been widely predicted as the international community seeks to appease Belgrade in advance of its planned announcement of independence for Kosovo, for which it needs at least a quiet nod from Serbian authorities.

It was just another in a series of compromises in the context of putting the greater good before the smaller goods. Earlier this month, the EU announced that it would restart integration talks with Serbia despite the fact that Belgrade has not demonstrated a willingness to cooperate with the UN's war crimes tribunal. [..]

The court exonerated Serbia of direct responsibility for genocide or complicity in genocide during the 1992-1995 war, when some 200,000 people were killed and some two million others displaced. The court also said it found no evidence that genocide was conducted anywhere else in Bosnia outside of the eastern town of Srebrenica, where some 8,000 Bosniak men and boys were slaughtered as a helpless UN force stood down.

Fifteen judges found that there was no evidence that Bosnian Serbs were in any way instructed by Serbian political or military authorities, and that even by the end of the war relations between Serbs and Bosnian Serbs were hostile.

The judges even rejected videotaped evidence showing a Serbian paramilitary police unit called the "Scorpions" massacring Srebrenica boys and men - a strong piece of evidence the Bosnian side was relying on.

The court ruled that the Scorpions, who are currently on trial in Serbia for their involvement in war crimes in Croatia, Bosnia and Kosovo, along with elite Red Berets, were not under the direct control of Serbian authorities at the time. However, in 1999, the Scorpions were absorbed into the anti-terror unit of the Serbian Interior Ministry - an important fact in light of the court's apparent lack of evidence.

Those lesser crimes for which the court found Serbia guilty were nothing new. The ICJ recognized the Srebrenica massacre, ruling that it been perpetrated by Bosnian Serb forces, who have long been found guilty by the Hague-based International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY).

The court also just repeated the well known fact that Serbia refuses to cooperate with the ICTY, referring largely to its failure to arrest Bosnian Serb wartime commander General Ratko Mladic, who is believed to be hiding out in Serbia under Serbian Army protection. In fact, it was Serbia's failure to hand Mladic over to The Hague that prompted the EU last May to halt Stabilization and Association Agreement (SAA), the first step towards EU membership for Western Balkan nations.

The ICJ also ruled that Serbia failed to use its influence with Bosnian Serbs to prevent the genocide of Bosnian Muslims at Srebrenica, and failed to comply with its international obligation to punish those who carried out the July 1995 massacre.

The international court rejected Bosnia's request for compensation for war damage from Serbia, with judges saying that that "wouldn't be an appropriate form of reparation for the breach of the obligation to prevent genocide."

However, the judges said that Bosnia should be awarded "symbolic" compensation from Serbia for its failure to meet its obligations in accordance with the 1948 Genocide Convention. The type of "symbolic" compensation was not indicated. [..]

A guilty verdict for Serbia for genocide would also have had implications had former Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic not died of natural causes in his Hague cell last year. Milosevic, tried for genocide and war crimes in Croatia, Bosnia and Kosovo, would most likely have been cleared of those charges in light of the ICJ ruling.

Since the ICJ found no evidence that Serbian political and military structures were involved in the Bosnian war, most likely Milosevic would have been found guilty for simply failing to prevent war crimes in Croatia and Bosnia.

The ruling is certainly a disappointment to the Bosnian people, but they have grown used to disappointment and, with the exception of those who survived Srebrenica, many are concerned more about the future than they are about the past.

There will be few rumblings in Sarajevo, at least from the wider public. Those even only slightly attuned to regional and international politics know that the crimes that happened in Bosnia will be conveniently forgotten in the name of the greater good. Today, the greater good seems to be appeasing Serbia in order to push through independence for Kosovo and avoid the bloodshed that would ensue if the ethnic Albanians do not win this round.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Jul, 2007 07:16 am
On a related note:

Quote:

Summary:

Quote:
Former BBC war correspondent Martin Bell testified at the trial of General Dragomir Milošević, who was the Bosnian Serb Army's Sarajevo-Romanija Corps commander during the war. Clips from his reports illustrated the indictment against Milošević: wanton shelling of the city, sniper terror, and the blocking of humanitarian aid.

Bell confirmed that Milošević's troops used new weapons like guided missiles, phosphorus bombs and modified air bombs that he defined as WMD. He also said the BBC at the time refused to show the real scale of the bloodshed during the Markale massacre, for which it should be ashamed.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Sep, 2007 04:33 pm
Quote:
17,000 Still Missing From Balkan Wars

The New York Times
August 30, 2007

Summary:

Quote:
At least 17,000 people are still missing from the wars that tore apart the former Yugoslavia, the International Committee of the Red Cross has said. An independent study in June put the number of dead in Bosnia's 1992-95 conflict at about 100,000, while 2.2 million people were displaced. More than 20,000 are believed to have been killed in Croatia's 1991-95 war, and up to 10,000 in Kosovo in 1998 and 1999.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Serbia: Return to the past? - Discussion by nimh
God of Justice (Serbian Anthym) - Discussion by gungasnake
Montenegro votes for independence - Discussion by nimh
Milosevic: Hero or Traitor? - Discussion by gungasnake
Serbia?-opinions! - Discussion by kosmos-SErbia
 
  1. Forums
  2. » World court: Serbia cleared of genocide, but not innocent
Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/27/2020 at 09:37:04