Reply
Sat 24 Feb, 2007 02:56 pm
It is sad, because no intelligent human being/American SHOULD be allowing themselves to be caught up in what the Democrats have been up to, but it seems that they are, as seems usual, more focused on attempting to win back lost power than they are in doing anything legitimate for this country. I am not a Democrat, but I am embarassed on their behalf... not as a conservative, but rather as an American.
I have voted for Democrats in the past. However, I do not feel I can no longer do that after the past three or four years. Based on what I have witnessed, I do not see how I will ever be able to vote for another Democrat.
It is no wonder (to me) Lieberman is seriously hinting at switching to the Republican party. He has always been a conservative at heart solely for the reason that he does not engage in or condone the self-serving (to only themselves) politics of of the far-left kook faction of the Dem Party. I do not take these people seriously (or respect their views) because they do not take themselves seriously beyond there personal collective "wants" that have nothing at all to do with real problem solving. They do not understand the concept (and the fact of the matter) that America has problems, but that America is not the problem. To watch them bash every aspect of the American social fabric solely for desperately longed for political power disgusts me to no end.
I have lost all respect for the Democratic Party -- that is the little bit of respect that I still was able to hang onto -- because they themselves have insisted I do so. Too bad that their far-left kook wing is now ruining the Democratic Party, and I doubt that they (the Dem party at large) will be ever be able to recover from where they have let themselves be led to and from what the party as a whole become. Sad. And as it stands now, I doubt that I will ever again be able to vote for even one single Democrat politician. In other words, I think Lieberman SHOULD consider switching parties, because this sincere and trustworty man needs to do this in order to retain personal and political legitimacy.
Jim Porter
I find the fact that they miss the message and always try to place blame where it doesn't belong to be highly offensive.
I'm sure some creep will show up and remind me about how invading Iraq was misplaced blame. But I'd also be willing to bet that back in 1991 they were either still in diapers or so stoned they thought it was still 1969.
Dem posturing very offensive
Have to agree with you 100%. And for the record, I too have voted my conscience in the past and will continue to do so. Unfortunately, that will likely preclude my voting for just about any Democrat this coming presidential election cycle.
The Democrats misinterpreted last November's vote. There were not given a mandate. In fact they were not given much of anything at all. The vote was an expression for the details of how the war in Iraq was going, not a vote to stop supporting those Iraqis who are fighting for an Iraqi style form of new beginnings.. which includes an Iraqi form of democracy.
The Democrats read things wrong (again) and I think they will pay a very surprising (to them) price for it come November, 2008.
No, invading Iraq was a BRILLIANT idea. After all, we've brought peace and democracy to the Middle East.
And for those of you who don't understand my sarcasm, and actually believe the above sentiments, we'd all be better off if you moved to that wonderful, peaceful, sandy resort called Baghdad.
Response to the "Gargamel" post...
1. You certainly ARE understood (correctly).
2. Too bad you do not understand (correctly) the issues your post referenced.
Sorry, but you still are getting it all wrong. Problem is, you will not ever realize this unless the Dems get their way.
Sorry, Gargamel.. but I have always suffered political/social fools very poorly.
You guys will be proven wrong again in 2008.
No sense arguing about how out of touch conservative wingnuts are until then.
Re: Response to the "Gargamel" post...
justbeinghonest wrote:1. You certainly ARE understood (correctly).
2. Too bad you do not understand (correctly) the issues your post referenced.
Sorry, but you still are getting it all wrong. Problem is, you will not ever realize this unless the Dems get their way.
Sorry, Gargamel.. but I have always suffered political/social fools very poorly.
I have read your post carefully, and I can see how a mentally challenged person would come to such conclusions.
Thank you that is all.
Read "Gargamel"'s and "ebrown_p"'s posts
Anyone notice any substance in either one of them?
I didn't. Which has all to do with the main point of my original post.
I can only assume that Gargamel & ebrown_p...
... wandered/stumbled into here after Yahoo tired of such types and closed down their messageboards.
)
Re: Read "Gargamel"'s and "ebrown_p"'s p
criticalthinkingskills wrote:Anyone notice any substance in either one of them?
I didn't. Which has all to do with the main point of my original post.
Where is the substance of your original post? All I see is a bunch of accusations of insincerity and opinions. Back up your assertions with some specifics and maybe you'll get more substantial replies.
Kicky, why do the Dems want to disarm law abiding American citizens?
Re: Read "Gargamel"'s and "ebrown_p"'s p
kickycan wrote:criticalthinkingskills wrote:Anyone notice any substance in either one of them?
I didn't. Which has all to do with the main point of my original post.
Where is the substance of your original post? All I see is a bunch of accusations of insincerity and opinions. Back up your assertions with some specifics and maybe you'll get more substantial replies.
______________________________________________________
Bear with me. New to this messageboard and don't yet know how the formatting works.
"Maybe" I do not have the time or inclination to wait for from Democrats. Don't have that because it never pans out. Never.
cjhsa wrote:Kicky, why do the Dems want to disarm law abiding American citizens?
Actually, Dems need to seriously consider disarming themselves. In general, they do not have an intellectual bone in their collective body.
Just being honest here.
Oh, and P.S....
kickycan wrote:criticalthinkingskills wrote:Anyone notice any substance in either one of them?
I didn't. Which has all to do with the main point of my original post.
Where is the substance of your original post? All I see is a bunch of accusations of insincerity and opinions. Back up your assertions with some specifics and maybe you'll get more substantial replies.
Perhaps you will find this question, directed specifically at you (since you requested it), substantial enough for you to seriously respond:
With so much ado, please tell me why (give the full answer, not the self-serving one that you THINK will hide you from the truth of matter) did the Democrats send a new commander to Iraq, knowing full well who they were sending and what the mission was that they were sending him to do?
Do you have a substantial and honest and sensible answer to this question, or will you dodge it?
You have the floor. Try your best to do something substantial (and honest) w/it.
Kicky
Have you quit beating your dog yet?
Re: Oh, and P.S....
justbeinghonest wrote:kickycan wrote:criticalthinkingskills wrote:Anyone notice any substance in either one of them?
I didn't. Which has all to do with the main point of my original post.
Where is the substance of your original post? All I see is a bunch of accusations of insincerity and opinions. Back up your assertions with some specifics and maybe you'll get more substantial replies.
Perhaps you will find this question, directed specifically at you (since you requested it), substantial enough for you to seriously respond:
With so much ado, please tell me why (give the full answer, not the self-serving one that you THINK will hide you from the truth of matter) did the Democrats send a new commander to Iraq, knowing full well who they were sending and what the mission was that they were sending him to do?
Do you have a substantial and honest and sensible answer to this question, or will you dodge it?
You have the floor. Try your best to do something substantial (and honest) w/it.
______________
"kickycan" bailed. Started something, then bailed when confronted with a perfectly legit follow-up question.
Liberals. lol!
edgarblythe wrote:Kicky
Have you quit beating your dog yet?
He wasn't his dog, he was choking his chicken.
Them damn liberals! I don't know what's funnier: Shooting them in a barrel or unloading their corpses with a front loader.
Re: Oh, and P.S....
justbeinghonest wrote:kickycan wrote:criticalthinkingskills wrote:Anyone notice any substance in either one of them?
I didn't. Which has all to do with the main point of my original post.
Where is the substance of your original post? All I see is a bunch of accusations of insincerity and opinions. Back up your assertions with some specifics and maybe you'll get more substantial replies.
Perhaps you will find this question, directed specifically at you (since you requested it), substantial enough for you to seriously respond:
With so much ado, please tell me why (give the full answer, not the self-serving one that you THINK will hide you from the truth of matter) did the Democrats send a new commander to Iraq, knowing full well who they were sending and what the mission was that they were sending him to do?
Do you have a substantial and honest and sensible answer to this question, or will you dodge it?
You have the floor. Try your best to do something substantial (and honest) w/it.
Why should I respond? I'm not a democrat. Or is it liberals that you don't like? I just wanted to point out your hypocrisy. I actually think Democrats and Republicans are corrupt, and that just about every idea either one of the parties has is rooted in f*cking the other party over, taking power, or lining their own pockets.
justbeinghonest wrote:edgarblythe wrote:Kicky
Have you quit beating your dog yet?
He wasn't his dog, he was choking his chicken.
Ah, now there's some substance! It's white and sticky and dripping from the corner of your mouth. You should wipe that stuff off when you're out in public.
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace