Reply
Fri 16 Feb, 2007 09:59 am
Dec, 1995 the House passed, 287-141, a resolution sponsored by Reps. Stephen Buyer, R-Indiana, and Ike Skelton, D-Missouri, stating "serious concerns and opposition to the president's policy" to deploy troops. But it expressed support for the soldiers and urged Clinton to provide them with whatever equipment is requested by field commanders.
Dec, 1995 the House passed, 287-141, a resolution sponsored by Reps. Stephen Buyer, R-Indiana, and Ike Skelton, D-Missouri, stating "serious concerns and opposition to the president's policy" to deploy troops. But it expressed support for the soldiers and urged Clinton to provide them with whatever equipment is requested by field commanders.
Dec, 1995 the House passed, 287-141, a resolution sponsored by Reps. Stephen Buyer, R-Indiana, and Ike Skelton, D-Missouri, stating "serious concerns and opposition to the president's policy" to deploy troops. But it expressed support for the soldiers and urged Clinton to provide them with whatever equipment is requested by field commanders.
Dec, 1995 the House passed, 287-141, a resolution sponsored by Reps. Stephen Buyer, R-Indiana, and Ike Skelton, D-Missouri, stating "serious concerns and opposition to the president's policy" to deploy troops. But it expressed support for the soldiers and urged Clinton to provide them with whatever equipment is requested by field commanders.
September 1995 -
Quote:Regarding Bosnia, during consideration of that same bill, the Senate passed a sense of Congress amendment that no funds should be made available to deploy U.S. armed forces to participate in the implementation of a peace settlement in Bosnia unless previously authorized by Congress. Another provision on the same bill opposed U.S. participation in any peacekeeping or peace-enforcing operations unless "the President initiates consultations with the bipartisan leadership of Congress" [Senator Robert Dole, Congressional Record, 9/26/95, p. S14271].
http://rpc.senate.gov/_files/92895Bosnia.pdf
From the same -
Quote:Issues for Consideration
The decision to send U.S. troops to any region warrants Congressional scrutiny. The Clinton Administration's willingness to send U.S. troops to implement a peace agreement in Bosnia raises a number of significant issues for Congressional consideration, which include:
Identifying the U.S. national security interests that are at stake;
Determining the number of troops to be deployed, how long they will stay and
conditions for withdrawal;
Defining the mission, rules of engagement, and command structure;
Allowing Russian participation in the peacekeeping operation;
Understanding how such deployment will impact the U.S. military's ability to fulfill other national security objectives (e.g., the ability to fight two nearly-simultaneous major regional conflicts, as identified by the Clinton Administration);
Analyzing the implications of troop deployment upon current policies toward Bosnia, (including: U.S. participation in enforcing No-Fly Zone; impact on the Administration's arms embargo policy);
Paying for the military operation; and, Ensuring Congressional participation (e.g., from consultation to authorization).
Seems the Republicans didn't think it was harmful to discuss such things when they were the ones doing the discussing.
Cycloptichorn
to quote the late great yogi berra
it's like deja vu all over again
To quote W C Fields, when asked, "Is this a game of chance?"
"Not the way I play it."
all of the above, I believe, proves the assholiness of the republican party (not that the dems are better)
They're poor little lambs who've lost their way . . .