1
   

Deja Vu

 
 
Reply Fri 16 Feb, 2007 09:59 am
Dec, 1995 the House passed, 287-141, a resolution sponsored by Reps. Stephen Buyer, R-Indiana, and Ike Skelton, D-Missouri, stating "serious concerns and opposition to the president's policy" to deploy troops. But it expressed support for the soldiers and urged Clinton to provide them with whatever equipment is requested by field commanders.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 498 • Replies: 11
No top replies

 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Feb, 2007 10:00 am
Dec, 1995 the House passed, 287-141, a resolution sponsored by Reps. Stephen Buyer, R-Indiana, and Ike Skelton, D-Missouri, stating "serious concerns and opposition to the president's policy" to deploy troops. But it expressed support for the soldiers and urged Clinton to provide them with whatever equipment is requested by field commanders.
0 Replies
 
Chai
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Feb, 2007 10:07 am
Dec, 1995 the House passed, 287-141, a resolution sponsored by Reps. Stephen Buyer, R-Indiana, and Ike Skelton, D-Missouri, stating "serious concerns and opposition to the president's policy" to deploy troops. But it expressed support for the soldiers and urged Clinton to provide them with whatever equipment is requested by field commanders.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Feb, 2007 10:09 am
Well, there you go then!
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Feb, 2007 02:10 pm
bump
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Feb, 2007 03:35 pm
Dec, 1995 the House passed, 287-141, a resolution sponsored by Reps. Stephen Buyer, R-Indiana, and Ike Skelton, D-Missouri, stating "serious concerns and opposition to the president's policy" to deploy troops. But it expressed support for the soldiers and urged Clinton to provide them with whatever equipment is requested by field commanders.
0 Replies
 
Chai
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Feb, 2007 03:40 pm
bump
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Feb, 2007 03:43 pm
September 1995 -

Quote:
Regarding Bosnia, during consideration of that same bill, the Senate passed a sense of Congress amendment that no funds should be made available to deploy U.S. armed forces to participate in the implementation of a peace settlement in Bosnia unless previously authorized by Congress. Another provision on the same bill opposed U.S. participation in any peacekeeping or peace-enforcing operations unless "the President initiates consultations with the bipartisan leadership of Congress" [Senator Robert Dole, Congressional Record, 9/26/95, p. S14271].


http://rpc.senate.gov/_files/92895Bosnia.pdf

From the same -

Quote:
Issues for Consideration

The decision to send U.S. troops to any region warrants Congressional scrutiny. The Clinton Administration's willingness to send U.S. troops to implement a peace agreement in Bosnia raises a number of significant issues for Congressional consideration, which include:

Identifying the U.S. national security interests that are at stake;

Determining the number of troops to be deployed, how long they will stay and
conditions for withdrawal;

Defining the mission, rules of engagement, and command structure;

Allowing Russian participation in the peacekeeping operation;

Understanding how such deployment will impact the U.S. military's ability to fulfill other national security objectives (e.g., the ability to fight two nearly-simultaneous major regional conflicts, as identified by the Clinton Administration);

Analyzing the implications of troop deployment upon current policies toward Bosnia, (including: U.S. participation in enforcing No-Fly Zone; impact on the Administration's arms embargo policy);

Paying for the military operation; and, Ensuring Congressional participation (e.g., from consultation to authorization).


Seems the Republicans didn't think it was harmful to discuss such things when they were the ones doing the discussing.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Feb, 2007 05:39 pm
to quote the late great yogi berra

it's like deja vu all over again
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Feb, 2007 06:05 pm
To quote W C Fields, when asked, "Is this a game of chance?"
"Not the way I play it."
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Feb, 2007 06:09 pm
all of the above, I believe, proves the assholiness of the republican party (not that the dems are better)
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Feb, 2007 09:28 pm
They're poor little lambs who've lost their way . . .
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Deja Vu
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/10/2024 at 11:58:20